Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat (Read 3953 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #45 - Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:32am
 
John Smith wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 9:53am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 10:01am:
Quote:
By the way, Mandates aren't real, it is purely something politicians invented to push through their agendas
John smith

I think that is silly thing to say Johnny, but one which is worth remembering,  Cheesy


you remember all you want ... my bet is you will conveniently forget when it suits you .... mandates aren't real. They are a fancy word put up by politicians to try and get their way.

Show me one single piece of legislation that mentions mandates ...  you won't find any, you know why? because there is none.



'mandates' are an ethical argument not a constitutional one.  It is a convention and a way of governing that is MORE than mere constitutionality and legality.  It is how we operate in a community or in this case how we operate in a parliamentary community.  It is quite obvious why you don't understand it.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
stryder
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4545
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #46 - Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 10:41am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 9:33am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 9:23am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 9:11am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 8:52am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 8:45am:
I know there will be time ahead for labor figures and historians to debate why the australian labor party was defeated comprehensively last saturday, but I believe the no carbon tax pledge is one of the many factors that contributed to labors defeat, hands down along with other factors such as the boat people issue, spending taxpayers money into many wasteful policies and programs and the debt were accumulating, the shady and dark relationship between the unions and the labor party itself revealed through the craig thommo affair and others like the backstabbing nature of the ALP leadership itself


yes, it was one of MANY factors ... but it was not the reason in itself.

If the only thing labor had done wrong was to introduce the carbon tax, and there were no other issues, the libs would never have won the election ...



And yet stupidity still runs wild in the ALP still as this week Labor member Mark Dreyfus has declared his party will oppose Tony Abbotts attempts to scrap the carbon tax, by stating that he got a mandate to defend good policy ? I MEAN HELLO, LABOR JUST GOT ITS @RSE KICKED LAST SATURDAY BY THE ELECTORATE AND HE SAYS THAT  Grin

Does labor want to learn from its mistakes or just be as dismissive of its mistakes like richard dreyfus and as you seem to be John smith ???


I'm not dismissive of anything, I just don't believe that Abbott won a mandate to do what he likes .. the people voted for a change in government, they also voted for a senate that would stop Abbott railroading his policies through ... why do you pretend that only the vote in the house of representatives matters and the vote in the senate can be dismissed ?   


Im not pretending anything, Abbott pretty much made it clear he wants to scrap the carbon tax he said it many times in slogans and sentences that people like yourself and lefties mocked, but Tony abbott won the trust of the australian people last saturday with that stated message repeated many times.

Quite frankly i believe the senate needs to be reformed as others as suggested to clearly stop the confusion of the measure of any mandate itself, will that happen is another thing.


SO!!!! What Abbott wants and what Abbott wishes for doesn't mean that the people gave him a mandate for it.  You undermine your own power in a system which already gives you very little when you interpret a mandate so widely out of what happened in the last election.  Oh I can see a little tear in your eye and a tug to your heart strings when the Pollies tell you what a great democracy you have, but what do you have really.  A sH^t campaign based on character assassination, negativity and very little discussion of policy and then every 3 years you get to put a few numbers in a box against a persons name and afterwards they expect to say "See the majority of Australians authorised me to do everything I ever mentioned in the campaign". And all the while your joining in the chant "look at me, look at me I live in a great democracy where I decide, I'm free Im free".  Don't let them rob you of your power to have a genuine say in how your life and the lives of your family is run.  Many people who voted for Abbott in the House did not vote for him in the senate because they did not want the carbon tax repealed. Many people voted for Abbott because, for example, they believed the libs would be better economic managers but hate his proposed repeat of the carbon tax.  Looking at the election results will never tell you where the majority is with regard to any of these issues.  Our system is not designed to give or ascertain mandates.  If the pollies want a mandate then they should give us a referendum to decide.  An election and a referendum are 2 very different things and of course Abbott wants to blur that distinction and in doing so its your democracy and your power in it that he is taking from you. Same goes for when labor tries the same trick. 



Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 16th, 2013 at 10:01am by stryder »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49016
At my desk.
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #47 - Sep 17th, 2013 at 8:19pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:32am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 9:53am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 10:01am:
Quote:
By the way, Mandates aren't real, it is purely something politicians invented to push through their agendas
John smith

I think that is silly thing to say Johnny, but one which is worth remembering,  Cheesy


you remember all you want ... my bet is you will conveniently forget when it suits you .... mandates aren't real. They are a fancy word put up by politicians to try and get their way.

Show me one single piece of legislation that mentions mandates ...  you won't find any, you know why? because there is none.



'mandates' are an ethical argument not a constitutional one.  It is a convention and a way of governing that is MORE than mere constitutionality and legality.  It is how we operate in a community or in this case how we operate in a parliamentary community.  It is quite obvious why you don't understand it.


According to Longy a mandate means that the Liberal party gets their way, regardless of who is actually in power or how.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74520
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #48 - Sep 17th, 2013 at 11:40pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:32am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 9:53am:
stryder wrote on Sep 14th, 2013 at 10:01am:
Quote:
By the way, Mandates aren't real, it is purely something politicians invented to push through their agendas
John smith

I think that is silly thing to say Johnny, but one which is worth remembering,  Cheesy


you remember all you want ... my bet is you will conveniently forget when it suits you .... mandates aren't real. They are a fancy word put up by politicians to try and get their way.

Show me one single piece of legislation that mentions mandates ...  you won't find any, you know why? because there is none.



'mandates' are an ethical argument not a constitutional one.  It is a convention and a way of governing that is MORE than mere constitutionality and legality.  It is how we operate in a community or in this case how we operate in a parliamentary community.  It is quite obvious why you don't understand it.


you mean like the convention whereby one party would act as a 'pair' for an opposing minister who couldn't make it? How many 'conventions' did Abbott ignore in opposition longy?

Paybacks a b1tch isn't it.

By the way, I don't remember you having ever explained why Abbott didn't allow labors 'mandate' for the ETS .... I'm still waiting for that answer. If I missed it, just say so and I'll have a look for it.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95759
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #49 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 2:49am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 10:00am:
I don't think it was the carbon tax itself. I think it was the process behind it.

I still think Abbott will keep the tax. It could work out quite well for him. He gets to keep the most economically rational mechanism for reducing GHG emissions. He gets to nullify the biggest criticism the left can throw at him. He gets to sink the boot into the microparties and independents and blame them for not getting his way and refusing to bow down to his glorious man date. We could end up with a carbon tax we cannot get rid of, but that neither major party is willing to claim ownership of.


Exactly. And let’s face it, what other tricks has he got up his sleeve?

Ditch the witch, stop the boats, but keep the tax.

Abbott might as well keep Labor’s policies. He’s not there to do much. Steady as she goes, remember?

Abbott’s in this for the big desk and chair - and a run at lunchtime. At the end of the day, what else is there?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95759
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #50 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 2:54am
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 12:13am:
No. I currently choose to live in Europe for a myriad of reasons both career and personal.

Nonetheless I am an Australian born citizen which makes my opinion more valid than some sheep fondling blow in with socialist bludging tendencies.

On the pension courtesy of the Aussie taxpayer no doubt like every other waster from those sh1t irrelevant islands of yours.


Excuse me, Matty’s father owns one of those islands. I’ll thank you to respect your superiors and keep a civil tongue in your head.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #51 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:56am
 
stryder wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am:
Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.


Oh look, Im not saying that Abbott wont be able to repeal the Carbon tax.  If the senate pans out as they're saying with 7 macro party senators, I think there's a good chance after July next year that Abbott will be able to repeal the carbon tax. But what I'm saying is that elections are not geared to determining where mandates lie because its not possible on the numbers of the election to determine where the majority lies on any issue.  And what I'm also saying is that in a few years time when labor wins office again it will start insisting that it has a mandate to do everything it ever spoke about in the lead up to the election, even though in all probability the majority will be anti many things that labor stood for.  IF you accept the mandate argument then its your power they are taking away. Dont let them do that.  If they want a mandate, put it to a referendum (where its obvious what the majority wants) otherwise its not a mandate.   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #52 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:28am
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:56am:
stryder wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am:
Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.


Oh look, Im not saying that Abbott wont be able to repeal the Carbon tax.  If the senate pans out as they're saying with 7 macro party senators, I think there's a good chance after July next year that Abbott will be able to repeal the carbon tax. But what I'm saying is that elections are not geared to determining where mandates lie because its not possible on the numbers of the election to determine where the majority lies on any issue.  And what I'm also saying is that in a few years time when labor wins office again it will start insisting that it has a mandate to do everything it ever spoke about in the lead up to the election, even though in all probability the majority will be anti many things that labor stood for.  IF you accept the mandate argument then its your power they are taking away. Dont let them do that.  If they want a mandate, put it to a referendum (where its obvious what the majority wants) otherwise its not a mandate.   


we don't have any binding referenda on legislative matters.  And if the labor govt took a referendum on the carbon tax and lost, do you think they would follow thru?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
adelcrow
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20133
everywhere
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #53 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:29am
 
One thing is certain and thats when a price is once again put on atmospheric pollution it will be a lot more expensive and less effective than if we had just stuck with it now.
The mad monk will be responsible for every death, every injury, every lost property and every devastated family whenever catastrophic weather events occur from the day he took office.
The finger is now pointing at phony tony .........................
Back to top
 

Go the Bunnies
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #54 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:02am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:28am:
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:56am:
stryder wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am:
Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.


Oh look, Im not saying that Abbott wont be able to repeal the Carbon tax.  If the senate pans out as they're saying with 7 macro party senators, I think there's a good chance after July next year that Abbott will be able to repeal the carbon tax. But what I'm saying is that elections are not geared to determining where mandates lie because its not possible on the numbers of the election to determine where the majority lies on any issue.  And what I'm also saying is that in a few years time when labor wins office again it will start insisting that it has a mandate to do everything it ever spoke about in the lead up to the election, even though in all probability the majority will be anti many things that labor stood for.  IF you accept the mandate argument then its your power they are taking away. Dont let them do that.  If they want a mandate, put it to a referendum (where its obvious what the majority wants) otherwise its not a mandate.   


we don't have any binding referenda on legislative matters.  And if the labor govt took a referendum on the carbon tax and lost, do you think they would follow thru?


Oh dear don"t know how many times I have to repeat this to you.  I am sometimes tempted to think that you just like to play dumb and then I realise, Nahhh he is dumb.  There is nothing to stop us having a referendum. Sure its not legally binding on the Government but I'd like to see them not do what the majority asked for.   Which answers the last question of your post.  You know the, ohh I'm so persecuted question about whether labor would honor a referendum ion the carbon tax. Answer, yes.  Ohh they keep persecuting me!!!!   


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74520
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #55 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:07am
 
John Smith wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 11:40pm:
By the way, I don't remember you having ever explained why Abbott didn't allow labors 'mandate' for the ETS .... I'm still waiting for that answer. If I missed it, just say so and I'll have a look for it.


don't run away longy .....
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #56 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:15am
 
adelcrow wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:29am:
The mad monk will be responsible for every death, every injury, every lost property and every devastated family whenever catastrophic weather events occur from the day he took office.
The finger is now pointing at phony tony .........................


Hey adelcrow, I agree.  This is especially true because the dear leader knows what the consequences of his inaction will be but is using this issue for short term political gain to appease the extreme right wing crazies in his party.  In my view Howard should have been punished for war crimes and Abbott for the most serious crime against humanity we will ever see in our lifetime. It is not a defense to the crime against humanity to say that "I did it because I believed it was in my financial best interests".      
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #57 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:25am
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:02am:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:28am:
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:56am:
stryder wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am:
Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.


Oh look, Im not saying that Abbott wont be able to repeal the Carbon tax.  If the senate pans out as they're saying with 7 macro party senators, I think there's a good chance after July next year that Abbott will be able to repeal the carbon tax. But what I'm saying is that elections are not geared to determining where mandates lie because its not possible on the numbers of the election to determine where the majority lies on any issue.  And what I'm also saying is that in a few years time when labor wins office again it will start insisting that it has a mandate to do everything it ever spoke about in the lead up to the election, even though in all probability the majority will be anti many things that labor stood for.  IF you accept the mandate argument then its your power they are taking away. Dont let them do that.  If they want a mandate, put it to a referendum (where its obvious what the majority wants) otherwise its not a mandate.   


we don't have any binding referenda on legislative matters.  And if the labor govt took a referendum on the carbon tax and lost, do you think they would follow thru?


Oh dear don"t know how many times I have to repeat this to you.  I am sometimes tempted to think that you just like to play dumb and then I realise, Nahhh he is dumb.  There is nothing to stop us having a referendum. Sure its not legally binding on the Government but I'd like to see them not do what the majority asked for.   Which answers the last question of your post.  You know the, ohh I'm so persecuted question about whether labor would honor a referendum ion the carbon tax. Answer, yes.  Ohh they keep persecuting me!!!!   





a plebiscite on a question like that would cost a LOT of money typically around $70M which is why such things are normally connected with elections to reduce costs.  by a non-binding plebiscite is the best you can have and most of us doubt the value.  If the ALP had bothered to have a plebiscite on the carbon tax they would have lost which is why they didn't bother and if they had, they would have ignored it.

and like it or not, that IS the state of play.  I would support a binding plebiscite but we don't have that facility.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
ImSpartacus2
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6913
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #58 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 11:08am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:25am:
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:02am:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:28am:
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:56am:
stryder wrote on Sep 16th, 2013 at 9:36am:
Are you sure about that ? given the layout of the senate so far is looking like a collection of kooky in nature parties but dont share most the of lefts ideas and beliefs so far either and in the mix the greens vote suffered a fall of nearly quarter, add those maths and you might see you have a potential problem for labors attempt to stop the scrapping of the carbon tax.


Oh look, Im not saying that Abbott wont be able to repeal the Carbon tax.  If the senate pans out as they're saying with 7 macro party senators, I think there's a good chance after July next year that Abbott will be able to repeal the carbon tax. But what I'm saying is that elections are not geared to determining where mandates lie because its not possible on the numbers of the election to determine where the majority lies on any issue.  And what I'm also saying is that in a few years time when labor wins office again it will start insisting that it has a mandate to do everything it ever spoke about in the lead up to the election, even though in all probability the majority will be anti many things that labor stood for.  IF you accept the mandate argument then its your power they are taking away. Dont let them do that.  If they want a mandate, put it to a referendum (where its obvious what the majority wants) otherwise its not a mandate.   


we don't have any binding referenda on legislative matters.  And if the labor govt took a referendum on the carbon tax and lost, do you think they would follow thru?


Oh dear don"t know how many times I have to repeat this to you.  I am sometimes tempted to think that you just like to play dumb and then I realise, Nahhh he is dumb.  There is nothing to stop us having a referendum. Sure its not legally binding on the Government but I'd like to see them not do what the majority asked for.   Which answers the last question of your post.  You know the, ohh I'm so persecuted question about whether labor would honor a referendum ion the carbon tax. Answer, yes.  Ohh they keep persecuting me!!!!   





a plebiscite on a question like that would cost a LOT of money typically around $70M which is why such things are normally connected with elections to reduce costs.  by a non-binding plebiscite is the best you can have and most of us doubt the value.  If the ALP had bothered to have a plebiscite on the carbon tax they would have lost which is why they didn't bother and if they had, they would have ignored it.

and like it or not, that IS the state of play.  I would support a binding plebiscite but we don't have that facility.


ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Has he finished yet.  Ahh no, not yet. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Rider
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male
Re: Carbon tax is to blame for labors defeat
Reply #59 - Sep 18th, 2013 at 11:14am
 
ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 10:15am:
adelcrow wrote on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:29am:
The mad monk will be responsible for every death, every injury, every lost property and every devastated family whenever catastrophic weather events occur from the day he took office.
The finger is now pointing at phony tony .........................


Hey adelcrow, I agree.  This is especially true because the dear leader knows what the consequences of his inaction will be but is using this issue for short term political gain to appease the extreme right wing crazies in his party.  In my view Howard should have been punished for war crimes and Abbott for the most serious crime against humanity we will ever see in our lifetime. It is not a defense to the crime against humanity to say that "I did it because I believed it was in my financial best interests".      


'tell 'im he's dreamin'  Grin Grin

you two whack jobs and your catastrophes crack me up  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print