polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 24
th, 2015 at 3:51pm:
If you oppose Islam you are in fact 'anti Islam'
If you have an obsessive fear of islam and you go on a murderous spree because of this obsessive fear - you are islamophobic.
Detect the difference?
No. It is not obsessive to fear any totalitarian ideology. On the contrary, fear of every aspect of a totalitarian ideology is the only natural response, followed by consistent, disciplined opposition to it, whether fascists, communist or theist. Islam is a totalitarian ideology. You must be mad for wanting it to rule everyone's lives.
"Obsessive fear of Islam" (Islamophobia) is a BS idea and a sinister, grinning cliche you and other Muslims constantly deploy because you have no rational argument to demonstrate that Islam is not totalitarian. It's a crappy, shop-soiled sloganeering appeal to the Muslim victimhood psychosis. It's bollocks. The only thing Muslims are victims of is other Muslims and Islamic ideology.
Brevik didn't kill Muslims. He was pissed of with the political class of his own country, own race, own culture. He was pissed off with his own people not seeing and actually encouraging the creeping Islamisation of the West and Norway in particular. He was pissed off with his own people buying the 'Islam is the victim' nonsense.
For these reasons he did
not target Muslims. He did not blame Islam for wanting to spread and take over Norway and the West and make it all part of the Ummah. He was pissed off with his own people for giving Islam a pass to do what what Islam has always been doing.
SO you can't call his murderous rampage an "Islamophobic" crime. No Muslims were killed or hurt in that particular rage, and they weren't even blamed by Brevik for what they are. It was not a murder spree aimed at intimidating Muslims but at intimidating the Norwegian political class.