Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1260 - Mar 25^th, 2015 at 9:13pm \|dev\|null wrote on Mar 25^th, 2015 at 1:11pm: SweetLambo wrote on Mar 24^th, 2015 at 11:18pm: Lets face it the niqab and burqa are the most ludicrous things even to be debated. So why bother Matty? Matty I don't . You seem confused baby Breath.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Online

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49042
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1261 - Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD. You are comparing Apples and Oranges. Perhaps you should open a fruit stand at the market?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1262 - Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:19pm

SweetLambo wrote on Mar 24^th, 2015 at 11:18pm:

Soren wrote on Mar 17^th, 2015 at 5:21pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 17^th, 2015 at 6:32am:

In the other thread Soren decided to take the 'eliminate Islam through rigorous debate' line. He seems to be implying he doesn't want to impinge on people's rights - while going to great pains to avoid actually saying it. I'm just giving him the opportunity to clarify this.

They also have the right to tattoo "press me I'm a tit" on their forehead. But the point is not about their rights, or more precisely it is not about just their rights.

I think I gave you a fairly lengthy explanation elsewhere so I am not sure what all this 'oh-yeah-but?!?" is about. They have the right but others also have the right to not respect their choice and to voice their opposition and their views. It should not be protected by law and so places like schools, hospitals, business should be able to order their removal if it clashes with their standards and expectations. They should be allowed to choose, to have the right not to accommodate it.

The niqab and burqa should be banned in public places and people should have the right to ban them on their private premises.

Lets face it the niqab and burqa are the most ludicrous things even to be debated. One would have to be mentally backward to even wear one let alone beg for the bloody privilege. The mussey men are the problem period. They are happy to strut around in a 3 piece suite and literallyShyte on their own wives and children by making them wear it. If they are told that's religious and do it because of that then they are simply backwardMorons. It is simply an oppressive backward culture full of slow people taken advantage of by pigs. That's the plain truth. There is no debate its plainbloody stupid. Ever seen a retard drive wearing one bloody hell stay clear.

I am sensing a certain depth of feeling here...

Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1263 - Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95814
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1264 - Jul 26^th, 2015 at 11:30pm

Soren wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1265 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 9:53am

Karnal wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 11:30pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?

Back to top

IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1266 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 10:47am

Soren wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 9:53am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 11:30pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?

After he died and his successors duked it out to see who'd be the new Caliph. Forgotten the Sunni Shiite divide? Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Online www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49042 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1267 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 11:02am Whereas today's Nazis live in harmony with one another...
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1268 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 11:39am freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 11:02am: Whereas today's Nazis live in harmony with one another... Yes, they do seem enjoy living their mottos, don't they? One People, One Nation, One Government! Sounds rather similar to what you're peddling FD. Funny, hey?
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95814
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1269 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 2:25pm

Soren wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 9:53am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 11:30pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?

But of course! Ein volk, ein welt, ein Fuhrer.

There’s that University of Balogney education, old chap. Good to see some of its been passed down to FD.

That’s the good thing about education, no? It’s a force for good in the world.

It makes us so much better than those awful tinted races.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Online www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49042 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1270 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 4:18pm So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1271 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 5:46pm freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 4:18pm: So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other? Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD? Lets hear your thoughts, OK?
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95814
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1272 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 5:59pm

|dev|null wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 5:46pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?

Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD? Lets hear your thoughts, OK? Grin

FD won’t answer that, HB, but here’s a clue.

Ban them.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1273 - Jul 27^th, 2015 at 6:10pm

|dev|null wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 10:47am:

Soren wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 9:53am:

Karnal wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 11:30pm:

Soren wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 26^th, 2015 at 2:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 11:29am:

freediver wrote on Jul 25^th, 2015 at 8:53am:

Quote:

You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter. In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.

How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.

Is this meant to mean something? Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe. Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD.

Er.... Mohammed?? Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer? His deeds are no longer instructive?

The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?

After he died and his successors duked it out to see who'd be the new Caliph. Forgotten the Sunni Shiite divide? Grin

So the Sunnis and the Shites crap on Mohammed and are really only interested in his successors?

Good to see you are still out of your mind.

Back to top

IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1274 - Jul 28^th, 2015 at 10:17am

Karnal wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

|dev|null wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 5:46pm:

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?

Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD? Lets hear your thoughts, OK? Grin

FD won’t answer that, HB, but here’s a clue.

Ban them.

No, I'd like to hear it directly from the donkey's Horse's arse mouth!

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged