Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 ... 188
Send Topic Print
spineless apologetics (Read 353582 times)
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1275 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 10:18am
 
Soren wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 6:10pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 10:47am:
Soren wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 9:53am:
Karnal wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 11:30pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 3:22pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 2:12pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25th, 2015 at 11:29am:
freediver wrote on Jul 25th, 2015 at 8:53am:
Quote:
You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter.  In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.


How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.


Is this meant to mean something?  Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe.   Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD. 




Er.... Mohammed??  Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer?  His deeds are no longer instructive?



The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?


After he died and his successors duked it out to see who'd be the new Caliph.  Forgotten the Sunni Shiite divide?    Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy

So the Sunnis and the Shites crap on Mohammed and are really only interested in his successors?


Mohammed was dead.  The Muslims were interested in had the loot and who was going to rule them Soren.    Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy

Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49042
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1276 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm
 
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1277 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 2:58pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it.


Really?  Where?  I've seen a great deal of criticism of Muslims and Islam but no suggested solutions that would fix this issue, once and for all!  I wonder why?  Too hard perhaps?  Much easier to critcise a man who's been dead for 1400 years?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy

Quote:
So are you and Karnal.


Well, I can't speak for Karnal but as far as I am concerned, I've offered pretty much zero as far as a solution goes.  I have been critical of you and your fellow Islamophobes for not giving Muslims a fair go though!  Your persecution is pretty extraordinary I think.  Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy

Nazis by the way are scum.  I have no sympathy for them or their beliefs.  Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49042
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1278 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 5:33pm
 
Quote:
Really?  Where?  I've seen a great deal of criticism of Muslims and Islam but no suggested solutions that would fix this issue, once and for all!  I wonder why?  Too hard perhaps?  Much easier to critcise a man who's been dead for 1400 years?


If Muslims could criticise him too, the problem would disappear.

Quote:
Well, I can't speak for Karnal but as far as I am concerned, I've offered pretty much zero as far as a solution goes.  I have been critical of you and your fellow Islamophobes for not giving Muslims a fair go though!  Your persecution is pretty extraordinary I think.  Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Nazis by the way are scum.  I have no sympathy for them or their beliefs.


But you do have sympathy for the beliefs of Muslims?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pho Huc
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 985
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1279 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people.  The majority of any large movement are normal people who subscribe to that movement for the personal benefit it brings to them, not any ideological superiority. law of averages.

Its always the minority banging on about their moral superiority who do the damage though.

If you transposed this conversation into the equivalent forum of an Arab country it would be FD, Sprint and Yadda telling us about the danger of the Christians, and how they bomb our countries and how we should fight them while us apologists would be explaining the fundamental similarities between Christianity and Islam, and how violence was not the answer.

Im happy being on my side of the fence(i get to annoy yadda and sprint  Grin )

P.S Sprint- hows about that bet! it was your idea- Im keen, fruit up time!
Back to top
 

The law locks up the man who steals the goose from the common, but leaves the greater criminal loose who steals the common from the goose (convict saying)
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1280 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 7:11pm
 
|dev|null wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 10:18am:
Soren wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 6:10pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 10:47am:
Soren wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 9:53am:
Karnal wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 11:30pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 3:22pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 26th, 2015 at 2:12pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 25th, 2015 at 11:29am:
freediver wrote on Jul 25th, 2015 at 8:53am:
Quote:
You appear to believe that Islam is a single, unified entity, Issuevoter.  In reality it isn't and what you're forgetting is that the overwhelming majority of the victims of Islamist violence are Muslims, not non-Muslims.


How does that make it any better? You might as well complain that we criticise Nazis even though millions of them died in WWII.


Is this meant to mean something?  Naziism was united behind a single leader who directed the entire national will towards the conquest of Europe.   Islam has no single leader and it is not directed towards the conquest of anything in a single unified manner, FD. 




Er.... Mohammed??  Not a unifying leader figure for Muslims any longer?  His deeds are no longer instructive?



The German Chancellor is the equivalent of an 8th century prophet, eh?

You studied IS at the University of Balogney, eh?

What? Mohammmed is no longer a unifying figure for... er.... Mohammedans?

When did this happen?


After he died and his successors duked it out to see who'd be the new Caliph.  Forgotten the Sunni Shiite divide?    Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy

So the Sunnis and the Shites crap on Mohammed and are really only interested in his successors?


Mohammed was dead.  The Muslims were interested in had the loot and who was going to rule them Soren.    Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy


So they said, the moment the 'best of men' was dead, 'f***k all that 'last prophet' and 'final revelation' sh!t, bro, show us where the white women are at?"

(And proceeded accordingly to this day... They kidnapped over a million Europeans and soled them into slavery, you know.)


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49042
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1281 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 8:18pm
 
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people.  The majority of any large movement are normal people who subscribe to that movement for the personal benefit it brings to them, not any ideological superiority. law of averages.

Its always the minority banging on about their moral superiority who do the damage though.

If you transposed this conversation into the equivalent forum of an Arab country it would be FD, Sprint and Yadda telling us about the danger of the Christians, and how they bomb our countries and how we should fight them while us apologists would be explaining the fundamental similarities between Christianity and Islam, and how violence was not the answer.

Im happy being on my side of the fence(i get to annoy yadda and sprint  Grin )

P.S Sprint- hows about that bet! it was your idea- Im keen, fruit up time!


Nazism, Islam, Christianity - all the same?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1282 - Jul 28th, 2015 at 9:03pm
 
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people. 



Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I could see this coming for some time - the 'vast majority' of Nazis were law abiding people and it was only a 'tiny minority' of the Waffen SS that hijacked the Nazi Ideology.

It is Naziphobic to paint all Nazis by the same brush. There were Nazi mothers who knitted socks for the 'disadvantaged' on the Eastern Front.


Anyway, Nazism is not monolithic, there were various factions (hello, Brain!) and nobody could possibly say that they all wanted to implement an aryan state along Hitlerist lines.







You Islamo-apologists are the worst caricatures of yourselves.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1283 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 7:36am
 
Most nazis don't believe their ideology/religion is peaceful and tolerant and deeply personal spiritual journey.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1284 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 12:41pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 5:33pm:
Quote:
Really?  Where?  I've seen a great deal of criticism of Muslims and Islam but no suggested solutions that would fix this issue, once and for all!  I wonder why?  Too hard perhaps?  Much easier to critcise a man who's been dead for 1400 years?


If Muslims could criticise him too, the problem would disappear.


You sure that would simply exacerbate the already fractious nature of Muslims in general and result in even more dead?  Or don't you care about the deaths of people in the furtherance of your persecution?

Quote:
Quote:
Well, I can't speak for Karnal but as far as I am concerned, I've offered pretty much zero as far as a solution goes.  I have been critical of you and your fellow Islamophobes for not giving Muslims a fair go though!  Your persecution is pretty extraordinary I think.  Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Nazis by the way are scum.  I have no sympathy for them or their beliefs.


But you do have sympathy for the beliefs of Muslims?


Not really but I'm more accepting of people who are peaceful and law abiding than Nazis who seek to kill and break the law.   Perhaps that is why I don't like your attitudes towards Muslims?   Grin Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1285 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 12:44pm
 
Soren wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 7:11pm:
So they said, the moment the 'best of men' was dead, 'f***k all that 'last prophet' and 'final revelation' sh!t, bro, show us where the white women are at?"

(And proceeded accordingly to this day... They kidnapped over a million Europeans and soled them into slavery, you know.)


That reveals so much about your attitude towards people Soren.  Just so much.

No, what they said was, "OK, you've got the money, you want to rule us, tell us why we should believe what you say?"   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95817
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1286 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:21pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 7:36am:
Most nazis don't believe their ideology/religion is peaceful and tolerant and deeply personal spiritual journey.


The whole point of Nazism is that it is violent. It turned violence into a social and political creed, if not a form of secular religion.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pho Huc
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 985
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1287 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:41pm
 
Soren wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 9:03pm:
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people. 



Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I could see this coming for some time - the 'vast majority' of Nazis were law abiding people and it was only a 'tiny minority' of the Waffen SS that hijacked the Nazi Ideology.




You Islamo-apologists are the worst caricatures of yourselves.






Thats why when the war ended Germany pretty much went straight back to being a modern democracy-because the majority of the people   didnt give two sheets either way who was running the show-they just went on living their lives.

Same in all countries, same in all religions.
The majority just try to fit in with whoever is in power.
The people with power try to do all they can to maintain that power.

I personally don't believe Moslems have any exceptional strength of character or belief, they are just people.

The only one who state that all Moslems have a implacable irresistible will regarding the conquest of the non Islamic world are people like Moses.

I don't know how they impressed him so much, but to me they are just another large group of people, with all the nutcases and saints that your gonna get if you round up a large enough sample size.

P.s your caricature line was very pretty, but betrays a fundamental misinterpretation of my statement. then again that's pretty much your standard modus operandi Smiley
Back to top
 

The law locks up the man who steals the goose from the common, but leaves the greater criminal loose who steals the common from the goose (convict saying)
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1288 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 4:01pm
 
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:41pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 9:03pm:
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people. 



Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I could see this coming for some time - the 'vast majority' of Nazis were law abiding people and it was only a 'tiny minority' of the Waffen SS that hijacked the Nazi Ideology.




You Islamo-apologists are the worst caricatures of yourselves.






Thats why when the war ended Germany pretty much went straight back to being a modern democracy-because the majority of the people   didnt give two sheets either way who was running the show-they just went on living their lives.

Same in all countries, same in all religions.




Are you aware of your category shift?  I am talking about about ideologies - Nazism, Islam, Stalinism, whatever.

You shifted to an entire country. Even at the height of Hitler's or Stalin's powers the majority of Germans and Russians were not members of the Nazi or the Communist party, respectively.

You cannot choose where you are born - but you do choose what ideology you subscribe to - Nazism, Islam, Communism, whatever.  So the Waffen SS to Nazism (NOT Germany) is like the Wahhabis to Islam (NOT Egypt, say).




So keep to ideologies and don't try to make it out that subscribing to Islam is like nationality.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pho Huc
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 985
Victoria
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1289 - Jul 29th, 2015 at 4:45pm
 
Soren wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 4:01pm:
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 29th, 2015 at 3:41pm:
Soren wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 9:03pm:
Pho Huc wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 6:56pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 28th, 2015 at 1:32pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
So you lot would become apologists for Nazism as soon as Nazis started disagreeing with each other?


Why don't you tell us for a change, what you'd do about Nazis and Muslims FD?  Lets hear your thoughts, OK?   Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy Grin Cheesy


There is no need to ask. I am doing it. So are you and Karnal. I expect I would respond the same to Nazis, particularly if faced with a bunch of apologists insisting that Nazis are just regular people who eat weetbix for breakfast and it is bigoted to criticise them.

Under what circumstances would that be necessary? Perhaps if Hitler had won WWII and his acolytes had splintered and torn his Reich apart?


actually, The majority of Nazi's were normal people. 



Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

I could see this coming for some time - the 'vast majority' of Nazis were law abiding people and it was only a 'tiny minority' of the Waffen SS that hijacked the Nazi Ideology.




You Islamo-apologists are the worst caricatures of yourselves.






Thats why when the war ended Germany pretty much went straight back to being a modern democracy-because the majority of the people   didnt give two sheets either way who was running the show-they just went on living their lives.

Same in all countries, same in all religions.




Are you aware of your category shift?  I am talking about about ideologies - Nazism, Islam, Stalinism, whatever.

You shifted to an entire country. Even at the height of Hitler's or Stalin's powers the majority of Germans and Russians were not members of the Nazi or the Communist party, respectively.

You cannot choose where you are born - but you do choose what ideology you subscribe to - Nazism, Islam, Communism, whatever.  So the Waffen SS to Nazism (NOT Germany) is like the Wahhabis to Islam (NOT Egypt, say).




So keep to ideologies and don't try to make it out that subscribing to Islam is like nationality.




I cede the point. I apologize for my misstatement.
What I should have said was that the majority of German citizens toed the Nazi line while hitler was in power, and that all Germans were considered nazi's by non-germans regardless of their personal political beliefs.
I was guilty of the mistake that I was accusing you off, that is identifying people as belonging to a particular group by association, without taking into account their personal beliefs. mea culpa mea culpa mea maxima culpa!
Back to top
 

The law locks up the man who steals the goose from the common, but leaves the greater criminal loose who steals the common from the goose (convict saying)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 ... 188
Send Topic Print