Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1755 - Aug 24^th, 2017 at 4:43pm

Pot kettle Black lord of the lying hypocrites....
Shame bwian shame....

Brian Ross wrote on May 9^th, 2017 at 10:10pm:

freediver wrote on May 9^th, 2017 at 8:37pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 8^th, 2017 at 11:55pm:

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2017 at 7:33pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 15^th, 2013 at 6:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 15^th, 2013 at 5:39pm:

Quote:

Is this the Islam you are so keen to defend with your "fair deal" nonsense, what about those who no longer believe in that bullshit barfed up by a 7th century desert bandit do they deserve a fair deal like article 18 of the Universal declaration of human rights?
Quote:

7 nations where atheism is punishable by death.
All 7 establish Islam as the state religion.
Pakistan,Saudi Arabia,Iran,Afghanistan,Sudan,Mauritania and the Maldives
www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/10/the-seven-countries-where-...

I make no excuses for those nations and their laws, BV. I merely recognise that it is their right to create and unfortunately impose those punishments. It is terrible but I also recognise I have no right or ability to criticise them. I am neither a member of their religion or a citizen of any of those nations.

Brian Ross wrote on May 8^th, 2017 at 12:55am:

freediver wrote on May 7^th, 2017 at 7:52am:

Brian Ross wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 11:11pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 4^th, 2017 at 8:00pm:

Quote:

Gandalf has a life outside this forum.

Gandalf refuses to explain his beliefs.

Anytime there's a hard question he runs away.

You mean like Freediver does? How interesting, Bobby. You have evidence to support this or will we see more obfuscation from you? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Brian what did you mean when you said we have no right or even ability to criticise other nations or religions?

Ah, misquoting again, hey, FD? Nothing new under the sun as far as you're concerned, is there?

Why not quote what I actually said, instead of what you believe I said? Might make a change. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

How am I misrepresenting you Brian?

See the highlighted pronouns, FD. You have claimed I said, "we". I did not. I only used the word "I". Are you going to be man enough to apologise? Or will you simply ignore this mistake, deliberate or undeliberate, I'll leave that to you? Tsk, tsk. Misrepresenting what another poster said. Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Roll Eyes

Why would you have a different set of rights to everyone else?

Though so. Not man enough to apologise. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1756 - Aug 24^th, 2017 at 8:38pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 24^th, 2017 at 3:59pm:

ahh ... so now FD's run away from the other three threads he's got going with the same comment, and moved it onto here

are you worried your bullshit would have been obvious to everyone if you had kept the comment in the original thread where it was made, so people could see the unedited version fd?

You do wonder why he bothers. Despite all of FD's convoluted squirming, he hasn't posted a sound or reasonable argument here for at least 2 years.

And for the life of me, I can't even remember what that argument was.

FD is a perfect example of what happens when you hand every semblance of reason over to your fear and loathing. FD will even agree with this. He acknowledges that he tells fibs, skews facts and makes stuff up in his crusade against the Muselman.

This could work if he could hide it. FD has even given that up - his arguments against G are no more than awkward, desperate posturing. FD tries to win arguments that are transparently false - that he even agrees are false.

Freeeeedom, innit.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1757 - Aug 25^th, 2017 at 4:01pm Pot kettle black innit
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1758 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 4:46pm

I call this one "the never ending tapdance".

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 3:34pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:55am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:39am:

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:32am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:31am:

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:27am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:23am:

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 9:19am:

John Smith wrote on Aug 25^th, 2017 at 10:21pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 25^th, 2017 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 25^th, 2017 at 10:55am:

freediver wrote on Aug 25^th, 2017 at 9:18am:

What am I wrong about John?

where to start .... usually everything

freediver wrote on Aug 25^th, 2017 at 9:18am:

And why are you so terrified to say?

I've said it all FD. But you keep pretending. It suits you.

Not saying eh? Can you tell us what a jellyfish sounds like?

no, I can't hear you. Only read what you write.

You've been practicing, haven't you?

you probably think that means something to anyone. Roll Eyes

Your jellyfish impersonation. You are getting quite good at it. Seeing as you are on a roll, should we refrain from criticising Nazis unless they do something wrong or openly reveal their hate?

I'm an amateur compared to you FD>

you have a PhD at being spineless

Let's go for the trifecta. How have I misrepresented you John?

do you not read the replies from me and others FD? Do you ignore them in the hope that everyone else will forget they are there?
I'm not interested in your stupid games where you ask the same things over and over. Sure, you can ask away, just don't expect me to keep answering. If you really want the answers, go back to the beginning and read the replies .... but this time, do it with your eyes open

Can you give me a link to the last time you gave a straight answer?

did that already. You pretended not to see it. Now you can go and look for it yourself.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38528 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1759 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 4:52pm And there you are 'tap dancing' EIGHT times, Effendi.
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48834 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1760 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 4:55pm Can you answer any of those questions that John can't?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38528 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1761 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 4:59pm freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 4:55pm: Can you answer any of those questions that John can't? Here's the deal. You ask them and I will answer....... Provided...you have the courtesy to answer the many questions posed to you by Karnal.
Back to top	IP Logged

Lastone Senior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 310 Pakenham, Victoria, Australia Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1762 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:07pm I find it Ironic really, It takes a Muslim to get FD to defend Atheism.
Back to top	I am yet to see a trickle down lift anyone up IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48834 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1763 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:12pm Can anyone explain how I have misrepresented John? Does John really think we should refrain from criticising Nazis unless they do something wrong or openly reveal their hate?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38528
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1764 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:17pm

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

Can anyone explain how I have misrepresented John?

Does John really think we should refrain from criticising Nazis unless they do something wrong or openly reveal their hate?

I'm sure not. Do you suggest otherwise?

Why does he say that you misrepresented him? Did you misquote him, or fail to fully quote him?

You do have plenty of very bad form, Effendi.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1765 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:25pm

I think he does. After all, that's what he said, but he did appear to backpedal in the same post. Obviously that's why I have been asking him whether he really thinks that.

He claims I misrepresented him because Lastone came to John's defence and said I misrepresented him. I suppose he didn't want lastone to look too stupid. Neither of the two can explain how.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38528 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1766 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:28pm And you did not address: Quote: I'm sure not. Do you suggest otherwise? Why does he say that you misrepresented him? Did you misquote him, or fail to fully quote him?
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74257
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1767 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:39pm

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

I think he does. After all, that's what he said, but he did appear to backpedal in the same post. Obviously that's why I have been asking him whether he really thinks that.

He claims I misrepresented him because Lastone came to John's defence and said I misrepresented him. I suppose he didn't want lastone to look too stupid. Neither of the two can explain how.

you're so full of sh1t. I told you that you misrepresented me long before Lastone came onto the scene. But that's just another comment you're pretending you didn't see.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74257 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1768 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:44pm pathetic that the best FD can do is lie and continually misrepresent everyone. But it's only bad when muslims lie, right FD?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1769 - Aug 26^th, 2017 at 6:26pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

pathetic that the best FD can do is lie and continually misrepresent everyone.

But it's only bad when muslims lie, right FD?

It is indeed. Lie, evade, put words in people's mouths, excuse ancient texts that compel slavery and genocide - it is only bad when the Muselman does it.

After all, FD reserves the right to do all these things himself.

You could say he's a "forgiven" Muselman.

Back to top

IP Logged