Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1785 - Aug 27^th, 2017 at 11:43am

ahhhh the fd and js show is still on..

the ratings must have improved....

what is it about jellyfish and Islam I am m issing??>..

Angry

why dont you boys go to the toolshed where you can beat eachother up with silly words..

that nobody else gives a damn about...

honestly fd I thought better of you....I thought your had at least left primary school...

bahhhhh humbug.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1786 - Aug 27^th, 2017 at 2:21pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 10:54am:

Frank wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 6:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 6:26pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

pathetic that the best FD can do is lie and continually misrepresent everyone.

But it's only bad when muslims lie, right FD?

It is indeed. Lie, evade, put words in people's mouths, excuse ancient texts that compel slavery and genocide - it is only bad when the Muselman does it.

Exactly - because the Muslim has not reformed. To Muslims it's still five minutes past 732 AD as far as the way of the world is. The Koran is eternal. Mohammed is the best and you are a stupid Paki.

Get back to us, idiotic Paki propagandist, when the Muslims and Islam have gone through the kind of transformations that the Western way of thinking and valuing has gone through in the last 1400 years.

neither has FD

FD was reformed.

He's since changed his mind.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1787 - Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:36pm

Aussie have trouble with the same question as John:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:26pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:18pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:13pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:12pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

Aussie do you think the Nazis would have given Arabia to the Arabs?

Highly likely....they'd hardly hand it over to the Jews if they (Nazis) had won the War.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Would you describe that as a good outcome?

Yes.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Just so long as the Jews don't set up a liberal democracy in the middle of it, right?

Yes.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Do you also think it is wrong to criticise Nazis, unless they openly reveal their hate?

How will I know they are Nazis?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1788 - Aug 27^th, 2017 at 11:26pm

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:36pm:

Aussie have trouble with the same question as John:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:26pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:18pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:17pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:13pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:12pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2017 at 8:08pm:

Aussie do you think the Nazis would have given Arabia to the Arabs?

Highly likely....they'd hardly hand it over to the Jews if they (Nazis) had won the War.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Would you describe that as a good outcome?

Yes.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Just so long as the Jews don't set up a liberal democracy in the middle of it, right?

Yes.

See, Effendi.....that's how you answer a question.

Do you also think it is wrong to criticise Nazis, unless they openly reveal their hate?

How will I know they are Nazis?

FD has trouble with any question at all.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44707
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1789 - Aug 30^th, 2017 at 6:37pm

Karnal wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 10:04pm:

Now back to the question - do you believe in the use of lies, evasion and pathetic, spineless excuses?

I see you, Bwian and other doing it every day so it's not a question. Of course you are lying and distorting. Of course you are evasive and selective. Of course you are a pathetic, spineless and slippery fish.
And so are your wives, Bwian, Mother, Arsie and the rest.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1790 - Aug 30^th, 2017 at 7:52pm

Frank wrote on Aug 30^th, 2017 at 6:37pm:

Karnal wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 10:04pm:

Now back to the question - do you believe in the use of lies, evasion and pathetic, spineless excuses?

I see you, Bwian and other doing it every day so it's not a question. Of course you are lying and distorting. Of course you are evasive and selective. Of course you are a pathetic, spineless and slippery fish.
And so are your wives, Bwian, Mother, Arsie and the rest.

You really don't want to answer this, do you?

Tsk tsk tsk.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1791 - Sep 8^th, 2017 at 3:36pm

freediver wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2017 at 10:13am:

mothra wrote on Sep 1^st, 2017 at 10:21pm:

Yet the people who express Islam as i choose to legitimise it say those people have got it all wrong.

I like their version better.

Like i like the church i grew up in more than Hillsong, although i'm not religious anymore.

Why do you choose to legitimise Islam? And what is your version of it?

Is Gandalf one of those people?

Mothra?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1792 - Sep 8^th, 2017 at 4:23pm

Frank wrote on Aug 30^th, 2017 at 6:37pm:

Karnal wrote on Aug 26^th, 2017 at 10:04pm:

Now back to the question - do you believe in the use of lies, evasion and pathetic, spineless excuses?

I see you, Bwian and other doing it every day so it's not a question. Of course you are lying and distorting. Of course you are evasive and selective. Of course you are a pathetic, spineless and slippery fish.
And so are your wives, Bwian, Mother, Arsie and the rest.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Liar, liar, your pants are on fire. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 8^th, 2017 at 6:34pm by Brian Ross »

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95299
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1793 - Sep 8^th, 2017 at 5:01pm

freediver wrote on Sep 8^th, 2017 at 3:36pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2017 at 10:13am:

mothra wrote on Sep 1^st, 2017 at 10:21pm:

Yet the people who express Islam as i choose to legitimise it say those people have got it all wrong.

I like their version better.

Like i like the church i grew up in more than Hillsong, although i'm not religious anymore.

Why do you choose to legitimise Islam? And what is your version of it?

Is Gandalf one of those people?

Mothra?

FD?

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48834
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1794 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 6:15pm

On people being taken to court in Australia for making a video:

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 4:02pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 4:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:55pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:48pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 2:46pm:

freediver wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

Is anyone here willing to admit to supporting this law?

if it annoys you I'll support it.

Let me guess, you won't stand on principle?

who's principles are you referring to here FD?

Don't you have any of your own?

even a simple question like that is beyond you to answer FD? what are you scared of?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 44707 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1795 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 7:40pm Ex-president Obama declares Irma " Hurricane of Peace ", urges not to jump to conclusions and succumb to stormophobia.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40938	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1796 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 8:47pm Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 7:40pm: Ex-president Obama declares Irma " Hurricane of Peace ", urges not to jump to conclusions and succumb to stormophobia. Surely the new el Presidente has something to say about this, Soren? Missing Obama already? Tsk, tsk.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44707
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1797 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 11:55pm

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Ex-president Obama declares Irma "

Hurricane of Peace

", urges not to jump to conclusions and succumb to stormophobia.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Surely the new el Presidente has something to say about this, Soren? Missing Obama already? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

More black men were killed in Chicago during Obama's presidency than in the Vietnam war, shitehead.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 10^th, 2017 at 12:33pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 44707 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #1798 - Sep 10^th, 2017 at 12:55pm We are witnessing the elimination of Christian communities in Iraq, Syria. No multiculturalism and tolerance in 'religion of peace' countries.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #1799 - Sep 10^th, 2017 at 2:49pm

Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 11:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 8:47pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 7:40pm:

Ex-president Obama declares Irma "

Hurricane of Peace

", urges not to jump to conclusions and succumb to stormophobia.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Surely the new el Presidente has something to say about this, Soren? Missing Obama already? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

More black men were killed in Chicago during Obama's presidency than in the Vietnam war, shitehead.

Evidence, Soren, evidence. Assertions are like arseholes, eerybody has one. Roll Eyes

Are you attempting to claim that President Obama was responsible, personally responsible for all those deaths? Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged