Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 6:06pm:
Frank wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 5:58pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 26
th, 2017 at 5:52pm:
How many?
And the use of crusade was admitted by bush to be the wrong choice of word. Now, how many jihadists afterwards tell us they were wrong to say they committed an act in the name of their religion?
Keep trying to link where links don't exist. It only goes to show how much of a spineless, dishonest apologetic you are.
Good point.
Oh, I know. Alevine's taken to your style, dear boy. The only thing he's left out is the tinted Paki Bastard compliment.
How about you actually stick to what we're discussing, Karnal? How many jihadists afterwards tell us they were wrong to say they committed an act in the name of their religion?
How many muslim leaders, who advocate for sharia law and you know...stoning someone for being raped, tell us afterwards that's not what they meant?
The point is, you can misstate a position (heck you do it all the time and so do I). You can misuse a word. You can overstate something in the heat of a moment. But, the reality is NONE of the people who have been telling us they do what they do because of Islam have backtracked and decided to tell us otherwise.
But keep getting your undies in a twist over Bush using the word crusade, which he then admitted was not what he meant. Not to mention that the decisions of a liberal secular society are not based on religion.
And you never answeered Karnal - how many Jews and Catholics celebrated Bush's use of the word crusade? A number, or a percentage, would do.