Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Datalife

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #345 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:17am

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

LOL, such is Brians idiotic sensibilities and one eyed moral flexibility he thinks defending the rights of Muslims to behead unbelievers is a preferable position to condemning such beheadings strongly and loudly which he equates it to religious persecution. Shocked

Such twisted pretzels of contorted thought are required to defend the indefensible it is no wonder his eyes are constantly spinning.

Back to top

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #346 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #347 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:00pm

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am:

Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.

No, actually I call them bigots when it is obvious they are in fact, actually, well bigots, FD. Nothing about winning or losing is involved, its just all about correctly identifying what your views are. It would be the same if I correctly identified an opponent's argument as being "Platonian" or "Marxist" or "neo-Liberal" or "Fascist", to name a few. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #348 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:03pm

Grendel wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2013 at 12:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

Were you insulting someone again, o' great hypocrite?

Nope, merely identifying what he was doing, Beowulf. You appear to have a problem with that. I wonder why?

For a person who claims he craves debate, Beowful, where is it? All we see is you posting ad hominem and silly cartoons and pictures. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #349 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 2:09pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:00pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am:

Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.

No, actually I call them bigots when it is obvious they are in fact, actually, well bigots, FD. Nothing about winning or losing is involved, its just all about correctly identifying what your views are. It would be the same if I correctly identified an opponent's argument as being "Platonian" or "Marxist" or "neo-Liberal" or "Fascist", to name a few. Roll Eyes

No, "correctly" identifying it would be very different, because you are always wrong, and you always start calling people bigots when you lose an argument.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #350 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 3:46pm

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 2:09pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:00pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am:

Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.

No, actually I call them bigots when it is obvious they are in fact, actually, well bigots, FD. Nothing about winning or losing is involved, its just all about correctly identifying what your views are. It would be the same if I correctly identified an opponent's argument as being "Platonian" or "Marxist" or "neo-Liberal" or "Fascist", to name a few. Roll Eyes

No, "correctly" identifying it would be very different, because you are always wrong, and you always start calling people bigots when you lose an argument.

Yeah, sure, FD, sure. What ever you want to believe. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #351 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:01pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2013 at 12:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

Were you insulting someone again, o' great hypocrite?

Nope, merely identifying what he was doing, Beowulf. You appear to have a problem with that. I wonder why?

For a person who claims he craves debate, Beowful, where is it? All we see is you posting ad hominem and silly cartoons and pictures. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

I get it... you don't want to debate.
you are afraid of debate..
You are just trying to deflect that onto others... how very bwian like of you.
So come on bwian instead of all the cwap... twy a bit of on topic for a change. Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #352 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:05pm

Grendel wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2013 at 12:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

Were you insulting someone again, o' great hypocrite?

Nope, merely identifying what he was doing, Beowulf. You appear to have a problem with that. I wonder why?

For a person who claims he craves debate, Beowful, where is it? All we see is you posting ad hominem and silly cartoons and pictures. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

I get it... you don't want to debate.
you are afraid of debate..

Continually attacking other posters and using ad hominem, insults, silly cartoons, etc. and not contributing anything worth discussing isn't debate, Beowulf. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #353 - Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 7:36pm OK Brian, now's your big chance. Please explain for everyone why you have no right or ability to criticise people from other nations or religions, even when they are violating fundamental human rights and chopping people's heads off for "thought crimes".
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #354 - Nov 4^th, 2013 at 12:15pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:05pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2013 at 12:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

Were you insulting someone again, o' great hypocrite?

Nope, merely identifying what he was doing, Beowulf. You appear to have a problem with that. I wonder why?

For a person who claims he craves debate, Beowful, where is it? All we see is you posting ad hominem and silly cartoons and pictures. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

I get it... you don't want to debate.
you are afraid of debate..

Continually attacking other posters and using ad hominem, insults, silly cartoons, etc. and not contributing anything worth discussing isn't debate, Beowulf. Roll Eyes

But you are a liar and a bigot bwian... I and others post on topic and you just ignore, name call or wunaway.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #355 - Nov 4^th, 2013 at 12:26pm take your time Brian
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #356 - Nov 4^th, 2013 at 4:02pm

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 2:09pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:00pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am:

Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.

No, actually I call them bigots when it is obvious they are in fact, actually, well bigots, FD. Nothing about winning or losing is involved, its just all about correctly identifying what your views are. It would be the same if I correctly identified an opponent's argument as being "Platonian" or "Marxist" or "neo-Liberal" or "Fascist", to name a few. Roll Eyes

No, "correctly" identifying it would be very different, because you are always wrong, and you always start calling people bigots when you lose an argument.

[/quote]

Only bigots ask the their opponent's religion. You did it, therefore you're, guess what? A BIGOT. Cheesy

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #357 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 10:45am

Quote:

|dev|null wrote on Nov 4^th, 2013 at 4:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 2:09pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:00pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 8:51am:

Every time Brian loses an argument he starts calling people bigots.

No, actually I call them bigots when it is obvious they are in fact, actually, well bigots, FD. Nothing about winning or losing is involved, its just all about correctly identifying what your views are. It would be the same if I correctly identified an opponent's argument as being "Platonian" or "Marxist" or "neo-Liberal" or "Fascist", to name a few. Roll Eyes

No, "correctly" identifying it would be very different, because you are always wrong, and you always start calling people bigots when you lose an argument.

Only bigots ask the their opponent's religion. You did it, therefore you're, guess what? A BIGOT. Cheesy

Weally Hot_Bweath?
You guys gotta do better than just consistently name call.
How about answering a few questions.
Joining in on topic debate.
If I ask your religion, it doesn't make me a bigot you know... just curious.
So when are you guys going to actually participate in the spirit of the debate? hmmmm.

Back to top

IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #358 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 12:35pm 24 pages! And still Brian has not been silenced! Still the effort to bully him into line has failed! Soon it will be the waterboarding and the "injecting with unknown substances for him!" Perhaps soon it will be the rack!
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #359 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 1:37pm how can one individual be so wrong you ask? easy genetics... It would seem you have that arseabout Jnr. bwian has taken a vow of silence and wunaway fwom debate. He has his mantwa and wepeats it ad nauseam. wight bwian? bwian? hewo...? bwian?
Back to top	IP Logged