Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #360 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 8:33pm

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 7:36pm:

OK Brian, now's your big chance. Please explain for everyone why you have no right or ability to criticise people from other nations or religions, even when they are violating fundamental human rights and chopping people's heads off for "thought crimes".

Been there, done that, got the t-shirt to prove it. FD. I refer you back to the previous explanations tended. If they fail to satisfy you, I refer you back to the other answers I have given you about life not always working out the way you want.

Remember the definition of insanity? Endlessly trying the same experiment and hoping to get a different result? Keep going, if you want, the results won't change. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #361 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 8:37pm

Grendel wrote on Nov 4^th, 2013 at 12:15pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:05pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 4:01pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 1:03pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2013 at 12:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:43pm:

You engage in religious persecution, Soren. If the cap fits, wear it. Roll Eyes

Were you insulting someone again, o' great hypocrite?

Nope, merely identifying what he was doing, Beowulf. You appear to have a problem with that. I wonder why?

For a person who claims he craves debate, Beowful, where is it? All we see is you posting ad hominem and silly cartoons and pictures. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

I get it... you don't want to debate.
you are afraid of debate..

Continually attacking other posters and using ad hominem, insults, silly cartoons, etc. and not contributing anything worth discussing isn't debate, Beowulf. Roll Eyes

But you are a liar and a bigot bwian... I and others post on topic and you just ignore, name call or wunaway.

Posting ad hominem arguments, insults, cartoons and silly pictures is not "posting on topic" unless you have a very loose definition of what that constitutes, Beowulf. Roll Eyes

When you post something that contains actual information, rather than your usual diatribes against me, I may respond. Is that difficult to understand?

I predict you'll respond with your usual MO of insults, ad hominem argument and of course a few silly pictures.

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40817

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #362 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 8:39pm

Grendel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2013 at 1:37pm:

how can one individual be so wrong you ask? easy genetics... Cheesy

It would seem you have that arseabout Jnr. bwian has taken a vow of silence and wunaway fwom debate. He has his mantwa and wepeats it ad nauseam. wight bwian? bwian? hewo...? bwian?

As with all your predictions and claims about me personally, you've got it wrong yet again. I wonder why you bother? I really do. Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #363 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 10:54pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7^th, 2013 at 8:39pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2013 at 1:37pm:

how can one individual be so wrong you ask? easy genetics... Cheesy

It would seem you have that arseabout Jnr. bwian has taken a vow of silence and wunaway fwom debate. He has his mantwa and wepeats it ad nauseam. wight bwian? bwian? hewo...? bwian?

As with all your predictions and claims about me personally, you've got it wrong yet again. I wonder why you bother? I really do. Roll Eyes

I just wonder when your lies and obfuscation will finally end bwian... you know full well I have been on topic and most of these types of posts are merely answers to your constant flaming and non engagement on topic. Cheesy

Every one here can read bwian... do try to maintain some semblance of dignity and honesty for a change.
Think of the poor example you are setting for Jnr. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40817	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #364 - Nov 7^th, 2013 at 11:11pm As usual, you have no understanding about what you speak, Beowulf. If anybody engages in flaming, it is you with your endless ad hominem attacks, insults, posting of silly pictures, everything except address the actually issue under discussion.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #365 - Nov 8^th, 2013 at 8:10am

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 7^th, 2013 at 8:33pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2013 at 7:36pm:

OK Brian, now's your big chance. Please explain for everyone why you have no right or ability to criticise people from other nations or religions, even when they are violating fundamental human rights and chopping people's heads off for "thought crimes".

Been there, done that, got the t-shirt to prove it. FD. I refer you back to the previous explanations tended. If they fail to satisfy you, I refer you back to the other answers I have given you about life not always working out the way you want.

Remember the definition of insanity? Endlessly trying the same experiment and hoping to get a different result? Keep going, if you want, the results won't change. Roll Eyes

Fail.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #366 - Nov 8^th, 2013 at 11:18am Whats wrong Freediver, don't you like it when Brian tells you to (politely, far more politely than I ever would) to get stuffed and refuses to play your little intimidation game?
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #367 - Nov 8^th, 2013 at 12:23pm I was just offering him the opportunity to prove that he is indeed capable of discussing the topic, rather than resorting to endless excuses and ad hominems.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #368 - Nov 8^th, 2013 at 8:23pm

Gandalf trying to muscle in on Brian's territory:

polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 4^th, 2013 at 11:30pm:

2. Vilification is vilification. If someone feels intimidated or harassed by what someone says to them, or about them vis-a-vis their ethno-religious association, then its vilification, and under our law illegal. Its that simple.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40817	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #369 - Nov 9^th, 2013 at 6:17pm freediver wrote on Nov 8^th, 2013 at 12:23pm: I was just offering him the opportunity to prove that he is indeed capable of discussing the topic, rather than resorting to endless excuses and ad hominems. We have discussed it, FD. You're just conducting another of your insanity experiments.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #370 - Nov 9^th, 2013 at 6:43pm I'm guessing they aren't considered silly images wight bwian?
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40817	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #371 - Nov 9^th, 2013 at 9:12pm Grendel wrote on Nov 9^th, 2013 at 6:43pm: I'm guessing they aren't considered silly images wight bwian? I still don't see much of a contribution from you, despite your stated craving for debate, Beowulf. Tsk, tsk.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #372 - Nov 9^th, 2013 at 10:39pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2013 at 9:12pm:

Grendel wrote on Nov 9^th, 2013 at 6:43pm:

I'm guessing they aren't considered silly images wight bwian?

http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/3277/58051092b.jpg

I still don't see much of a contribution from you, despite your stated craving for debate, Beowulf. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

And yet another silly image... happy to oblige pointing out your hypocrisy bwian Wink

Mine are far superior BTW Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40817	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #373 - Nov 10^th, 2013 at 10:37am I still don't see much of a contribution from you, despite your stated craving for debate, Beowulf. Tsk, tsk.
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #374 - Nov 10^th, 2013 at 1:02pm

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10^th, 2013 at 10:37am:

I still don't see much of a contribution from you, despite your stated craving for debate, Beowulf. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

So what do you call this again bwian?
Contributing? Grin

Bwian bwian bwian... you know as well as I do bwian its lies and flaming... bwian builds strawmen and uses ad hom to denigrate those he is afraid to debate on topic... everyone knows that bwian..
You are just making yourself look more stupid, (if possible) and wasting everyone's time.

Back to top

IP Logged