Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 ... 188
Send Topic Print
spineless apologetics (Read 354999 times)
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #720 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:27pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 5:53pm:

I tend to be more forgiving to those who make mistakes and then change for the better. Smiley

Bernard Hickey OAM- Australia is the land of the second chance.




Moslems do not require a second chance.

ISLAM is not a mistake [i speak as a moslem].

ISLAM is Allah's perfect religion.

QUESTION;
Why would a moslem abandon ISLAM, when he considers ISLAM to be perfect and error free ?

He won't.

The moslem is not for turning.

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18533
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #721 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:48pm
 
Yadda wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 5:53pm:

I tend to be more forgiving to those who make mistakes and then change for the better. Smiley

Bernard Hickey OAM- Australia is the land of the second chance.




Moslems do not require a second chance.

ISLAM is not a mistake [i speak as a moslem].

ISLAM is Allah's perfect religion.

QUESTION;
Why would a moslem abandon ISLAM, when he considers ISLAM to be perfect and error free ?




What about ex muslims Yadda, i think they deserve a second chance.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #722 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:58pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:48pm:
Yadda wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 5:53pm:

I tend to be more forgiving to those who make mistakes and then change for the better. Smiley

Bernard Hickey OAM- Australia is the land of the second chance.




Moslems do not require a second chance.

ISLAM is not a mistake [i speak as a moslem].

ISLAM is Allah's perfect religion.

QUESTION;
Why would a moslem abandon ISLAM, when he considers ISLAM to be perfect and error free ?




What about ex muslims Yadda, i think they deserve a second chance.






You are correct Baron,

Everyone should have an option, to be given a second chance.

Ex-moslems, by definition, have taken up that option [of a second chance].

And good on them!

And God bless Ex-moslems in their new journey.






Psalms 146:8
The LORD openeth the eyes of the blind: the LORD raiseth them that are bowed down: the LORD loveth the righteous:

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95944
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #723 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 7:39pm
 
But what about ex-Muslims who believe in giving current Muslims a second chance?

GUILTY AS CHARGED.

These people are akin to Muslims themselves. All will be dealt with in the fullness of time.

Gud is great, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95944
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #724 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 8:32pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 5:53pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 4:33pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 12:51pm:
In the spirit of mindless necroposting purely the sake of petty point scoring...

check out these spineless aplogetics:

freediver wrote on Apr 25th, 2007 at 4:01pm:
The more violent aspects of Islam have only emerged relatively recently.


freediver wrote on Apr 27th, 2007 at 7:14pm:
You didn't expect it to be easy did you? You can't expect people to join you in your muslim bashing after one or two scare stories. People get tired of getting worked up over each new 'threat' to our society, especially if it is another minority group who are 'all the same'.


freediver wrote on Apr 27th, 2007 at 7:14pm:
You do have a tendency to tar all muslims with the same brush.


freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2007 at 3:04am:
And no... it's not an Australian cultural trait to 'rape.' 

Neither is it a Muslim thing.


and my personal favourite...

freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


FD, in light of your own sage advise, do you believe that your antics during the last couple of years is the sort of behaviour that "pushes weaker individuals towards extremism"?


This is appalling. I can't believe someone in FD's position would resort to such spineless apologetics.

GUILTY.


I tend to be more forgiving to those who make mistakes and then change for the better. Smiley

Bernard Hickey OAM- Australia is the land of the second chance.




What makes FD right then? What makes FD right now?

Is time our only measure of justice?

The FD of today would have interrogated the FD OF 2007. He would have created threads with his mealy-mouthed words. He would persue him relentlessly. He would never let him off the hook.

The FD of 2007 would have twisted, squirmed and contorted himself into all sorts of spineless shapes. He would have begged to be impaled by the Muselman. Oh!

Will the real FD please stand up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #725 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 8:57pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 12:51pm:
In the spirit of mindless necroposting purely the sake of petty point scoring...

check out these spineless aplogetics:

freediver wrote on Apr 25th, 2007 at 4:01pm:
The more violent aspects of Islam have only emerged relatively recently.


freediver wrote on Apr 27th, 2007 at 7:14pm:
You didn't expect it to be easy did you? You can't expect people to join you in your muslim bashing after one or two scare stories. People get tired of getting worked up over each new 'threat' to our society, especially if it is another minority group who are 'all the same'.


freediver wrote on Apr 27th, 2007 at 7:14pm:
You do have a tendency to tar all muslims with the same brush.


freediver wrote on Mar 28th, 2007 at 3:04am:
And no... it's not an Australian cultural trait to 'rape.' 

Neither is it a Muslim thing.


and my personal favourite...

freediver wrote on Mar 21st, 2007 at 5:56pm:
What we need to do is stop alienating the entire muslim community and work with them towards the goals we have in common. The more we tar them all with the same brush, the more we push weaker individuals towards extremism.


FD, in light of your own sage advise, do you believe that your antics during the last couple of years is the sort of behaviour that "pushes weaker individuals towards extremism"?


Not really. I try to be very targetted in my criticism. Thanks for digging this up though. Muslims often argue that I have pre-concieved ideas about Islam that will not change no matter what. The truth is I approached this from the mindset of people like Karnal and Brian Ross. However I do concede that the risk is there, I just don't think that the risk of violence from Muslims is a good reason for self-censorship about Islam. I think rewarding violence or the threat of violence with self censorship will do far more to encourage it.

Two things have changed since I made those posts. One is that we have had Muslims participating in the discussions (I think those comments predate Malik), that has 'sorted the wheat from the chaff', in terms of the criticisms people make about Islam. Two is that I have found out from Muslims what Islam is about.

Quote:
What I can't shake though is the feeling that the FD who wrote these things 7 years ago would label the FD who writes what he writes today as bigoted, narrow minded


Have I ever used those terms?

Quote:
What makes FD right then? What makes FD right now?

Is time our only measure of justice?

The FD of today would have interrogated the FD OF 2007. He would have created threads with his mealy-mouthed words. He would persue him relentlessly. He would never let him off the hook.

The FD of 2007 would have twisted, squirmed and contorted himself into all sorts of spineless shapes. He would have begged to be impaled by the Muselman. Oh!

Will the real FD please stand up.


Have I pursued you? Have I pursued Brian Ross? A little bit. You have conceded, as a result of these discussions (I don't take the credit myself), that there are significant problems with Islam, and you tend to see the same problems that I do.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95944
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #726 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 10:11pm
 
Sane, measured, reliable, reasonable, say what you’ll do and do what you say, that’s Mr Abbott’s motto.

Always, absolutely, never ever, that’s the old boy’s motto.

Nothing changes and nothing stays the same - K.

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow - Macbeth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21786
A cat with a view
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #727 - Mar 5th, 2014 at 10:21pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 10:11pm:
Sane, measured, reliable, reasonable, say what you’ll do and do what you say, that’s Mr Abbott’s motto.

Always, absolutely, never ever, that’s the old boy’s motto.

Nothing changes and nothing stays the same - K.

Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow - Macbeth.



K,

And don't forget;


"BEHEAD ALL THOSE WHO INSULT THE PROPHET."
  -  the 'radicalised' moslem.



"ISLAM is peace!"
  -  the rational moslem.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #728 - Mar 6th, 2014 at 6:45am
 
Thanks FD, I do appreciate your sincerity.

freediver wrote on Mar 5th, 2014 at 8:57pm:
Two things have changed since I made those posts. One is that we have had Muslims participating in the discussions (I think those comments predate Malik), that has 'sorted the wheat from the chaff', in terms of the criticisms people make about Islam. Two is that I have found out from Muslims what Islam is about.


As regards to Malik, I just read a couple of long threads where you do nothing but support Malik. I certainly hope you don't put Malik in the same boat as Falah and Abu - for while I haven't read all his posts, so far he is nothing but polite, accommodating and remarkably tolerant of opposing views. He was certainly tested by some fairly intense trolling from sprintcyclist and others.

Also, it was not all "smooth sailing" for you in those days. You did make one slip which was perhaps a portent of things to come - when you made an off-the-cuff sweeping generalisation about all muslim women being subjugated from birth.

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #729 - Mar 6th, 2014 at 7:42pm
 
Quote:
As regards to Malik, I just read a couple of long threads where you do nothing but support Malik. I certainly hope you don't put Malik in the same boat as Falah and Abu - for while I haven't read all his posts, so far he is nothing but polite, accommodating and remarkably tolerant of opposing views. He was certainly tested by some fairly intense trolling from sprintcyclist and others.


I don't recall. I did get him and Abu mixed up a few times, and Abu complained that I attributed nasty things said about Islam by Malik to him. As I recall, Malik was a shite, yet handed this board over to Abu. I think it was either Malik or Abu who originally motivated me to add the Islam page to the wiki, by misrepresenting what he himself had said about Islam only a few pages earlier. I am leaning towards Malik. It got to the point that I was so frequently looking back through the thread for where he had contradicted himself (or at least, was more honest and left out the BS spin) that it became easier to note it and link it in the wiki. It was incredibly confusing for a while, until I got my head around the subtle ways that Muslims would spin Islam to make it appear compatible with western values. I originally saw the wiki as a way of differentiating the genuine criticisms of Islam from some of the more extreme ones posted by Yadda from a few specific sites, yet I think it ended up reinforcing much of it.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #730 - Jul 20th, 2014 at 8:42pm
 
Hi Brian!
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #731 - Jul 20th, 2014 at 8:50pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 20th, 2014 at 8:42pm:
Hi Brian!


Now that's a demonstration of 'tolerance' that is next to Godly.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #732 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 10:43am
 
Holy return of the personal attack thread Batman!   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18533
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #733 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 11:13am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 6:22pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 5:39pm:
Quote:
Is this the Islam you are so keen to defend with your "fair deal" nonsense, what about those who no longer believe in that bullshit barfed up by a 7th century desert bandit do they deserve a fair deal like article 18 of the Universal declaration of human rights?
Quote:
7 nations where atheism is punishable by death.
All 7 establish Islam as the state religion.
Pakistan,Saudi Arabia,Iran,Afghanistan,Sudan,Mauritania and the Maldives
www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/12/10/the-seven-countries-where-...



I make no excuses for those nations and their laws, BV.  I merely recognise that it is their right to create and unfortunately impose those punishments.   It is terrible but I also recognise I have no right or ability to criticise them.  I am neither a member of their religion or a citizen of any of those nations.



So how does your criticism of israel fit in with that spineless garbage brian,did you start a thread on the yahud,are you a munafiq?

13 islamic countries execute people for the crime of atheism, a clear violation of article 18 of the UDHR-
www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/10/us-religion-atheists-idUSBRE9B900G20131210



Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #734 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 1:50pm
 
Looks like Brian has finally found something to support his head:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 19th, 2014 at 12:40am:
Quote:
    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for the Muslims, and I did not speak out-
    Because I was not a Muslim.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


You are a sick, intolerant person who expresses bigotry towards Muslims.

As John Stuart Mill suggested, "Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing."  I refuse to look on, Sprint and I will resist you and your ilk as much as I am able to.


Of course, with Brian it is all about context. That is what he sounds like when people are criticising non-Muslims for criticising Muslims. This is what he sounds like when people are criticising Muslims:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 5:39pm:
I make no excuses for those nations and their laws, BV.  I merely recognise that it is their right to create and unfortunately impose those punishments.   It is terrible but I also recognise I have no right or ability to criticise them.  I am neither a member of their religion or a citizen of any of those nations.


Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 ... 188
Send Topic Print