Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 ... 188
Send Topic Print
spineless apologetics (Read 354985 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #735 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 6:04pm
 
FD you do seem to have an unnatural obsession with Brian's posts.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #736 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 6:39pm
 
You can tell this by the fact that I quote them? Do they not strike you as unusually perverse?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #737 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 7:48pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 21st, 2014 at 6:39pm:
You can tell this by the fact that I quote them?


- a lot.

freediver wrote on Jul 21st, 2014 at 6:39pm:
Do they not strike you as unusually perverse?


I admit they do - after you are done mutilating them and constructing all sorts of strawmen about them.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #738 - Jul 21st, 2014 at 8:46pm
 
Yes, Brian whined quite a lot about me taking him out of context. That is why I provided the context:

freediver wrote on Jul 21st, 2014 at 1:50pm:
Looks like Brian has finally found something to support his head:

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 19th, 2014 at 12:40am:
Quote:
    First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Socialist.

    Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
    Because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for the Muslims, and I did not speak out-
    Because I was not a Muslim.

    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.


You are a sick, intolerant person who expresses bigotry towards Muslims.

As John Stuart Mill suggested, "Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing."  I refuse to look on, Sprint and I will resist you and your ilk as much as I am able to.


Of course, with Brian it is all about context. That is what he sounds like when people are criticising non-Muslims for criticising Muslims. This is what he sounds like when people are criticising Muslims:

Brian Ross wrote on Sep 15th, 2013 at 5:39pm:
I make no excuses for those nations and their laws, BV.  I merely recognise that it is their right to create and unfortunately impose those punishments.   It is terrible but I also recognise I have no right or ability to criticise them.  I am neither a member of their religion or a citizen of any of those nations.




If you found this in any way misleading, now would be a good opportunity to explain. Might I suggest going beyond repeating the word "strawman"? It is a bit hard to make that one stick when I am using direct quotes.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #739 - Jul 23rd, 2014 at 9:10pm
 
From the other thread. Gandalf I am pretty sure you have agreed with me previously about what Brian posted. Why are you now trying to defend it?

polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 22nd, 2014 at 12:24am:
Those "other contexts" were specifically the laws and practices of other countries.


Are you apologising for Brian's spineless apologetics? Does it make a difference to how you feel about what Brian posted? And you are wrong. It was not limited to other countries. He included other religions in the reasons why he has no right to criticise certain people.

Quote:
Here we have people openly calling for persecution of people based on their religious beliefs


Islam is a political and a religious ideology.

Quote:
I actually think this constitutes a fairly serious threat


I don't. At least, not directly.

Quote:
that has far more relevance to us all - as Australians. So no, I don't really think its hypocritical for Brian to be more concerned about what happens in the society in which we live in - than to foreign communities living on the other side of the world that he has nothing to do with.


I did not accuse him of hypocrisy because of the different level of his concern, but because he employed the exact opposite argument - in one case stating the imperative of speaking out when you see injustice, in the other case arguing he has no right or ability to speak out. Please quit pretending you cannot understand this.

Quote:
99% of posters here come here to demonize muslims and islam


Crap. You are starting to get a persecution complex Gandalf. I concede that probably more than half are in general critics of Islam, but I hardly think that is unfair. You yourself profess to be a critic, though I am yet to see it in action.

Quote:
So instead of refuting the vitriolic crap that sprint and yadda spew (which I am certain you yourself recognise as crap), you run after Brian all day


Now you are sounding jealous. I devote far more of my time to you than to Brian, I promise. But there is just something about Brian's hypocrisy that makes my skin crawl.

Quote:
not because what he says is anywhere near as reprehensible as what most others here say


I challenge you to find a single other statement anywhere on this forum that is more worthy of the label "spineless apologetics". Just think of Brian as another unfairly treated poster child for you to rescue from their own incompetence. Perhaps you can reveal an anecdote about Brian being too afraid to speak out in the past to make us more sympathetic to Brian's crap about not having a right to criticise Muslims.

Quote:
but because you simply can't bring yourself to address what you must know are the lies and dishonesty of the anti-muslim crowd


I do, on occasion. That is part of the reason why I put together the wiki - so that we could focus on the genuinely barbaric aspects of Islam rather than the strawmen.

Quote:
Hence this latest attack on Brian is entirely hypocritical on your part.


Can you demonstrate any actual hypocrisy on my part? Or has hypocrisy now become not paying enough attention to you?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95937
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #740 - Jul 23rd, 2014 at 9:24pm
 
You apologeticists can run, but you can’t hide. FD’s back.

We blame Islam - and vaccilating, hand-wringing, limp-wristed, spineless apologeticisticism.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #741 - Jul 23rd, 2014 at 11:51pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 23rd, 2014 at 9:10pm:
Quote:
Here we have people openly calling for persecution of people based on their religious beliefs


Islam is a political and a religious ideology.


Why do you insist on planting beliefs in people's minds? For me, islam is not a political ideology, it is a very personal thing only, and I have no desire to make it political. I'm sure thats the attitude of a great many muslims in Australia - who like me, strongly advocate peace and secular values. Thats the thing about religion - you don't get to dictate what other people believe, its entirely up to the individual to decide what they mean by "I'm muslim".

Yet here we have open calls for all muslims to be indiscriminately persecuted and expelled from the country (where to is anyone's guess). Gross violations of people's human rights based on nothing else but their personal beliefs. Thats fascism pure and simple - and it directly affects all of us as Australians. And you are spinelessly apologising for it. Sorry if I find this more outrageous than Brian refusing to condemn the actions of people on the other side of the world.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #742 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am
 
Quote:
Why do you insist on planting beliefs in people's minds? For me, islam is not a political ideology


Forgive me for not taking you as representative of Islam. When you insisted that Muhammed's call to execute homosexuals is actually a statement of tolerance you lost me.

Quote:
I'm sure thats the attitude of a great many muslims in Australia - who like me, strongly advocate peace and secular values.


Sure, just like the Malaysians and Indonesians. Every time you make these claims you run into trouble. You'd think you'd learn.

Quote:
Thats the thing about religion - you don't get to dictate what other people believe


You do, apparently. Even when people go to the trouble of asking Muslims what they believe, you are ready to step in a clarify how they really feel.

Quote:
Thats fascism pure and simple - and it directly affects all of us as Australians. And you are spinelessly apologising for it.


How so? I have already said that I agree with you.

Quote:
Sorry if I find this more outrageous than Brian refusing to condemn the actions of people on the other side of the world.


Again, please quit pretending that you do not comprehend this. It is not Brian's inaction that I criticise, but his active support for not have a right or ability to speak out.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #743 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 12:13pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
Forgive me for not taking you as representative of Islam. When you insisted that Muhammed's call to execute homosexuals is actually a statement of tolerance you lost me.


Thats because I didn't. But at least you've gone from "statement of gay pride" to merely "statement of tolerance" - thats something I guess. Maybe in another few months you'll quote what I actually said.

Islam is a personal and non-political ideology for the vast majority of muslims living in western countries. You can check this from the surveys of the same researchers you love to quote about Malaysians.

freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
Sure, just like the Malaysians and Indonesians.


Exactly. I think we worked out about half Malaysian muslims advocate secular values like freedom of religion and not applying hudud laws. That would just reinforce the view that "a great many" muslims in a western country like Australia have similar, and even more secular views. So please pull out the evil views of approximately half of all Malaysian muslims - it just reinforces my claim.

freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
You do, apparently. Even when people go to the trouble of asking Muslims what they believe, you are ready to step in a clarify how they really feel.


Ah yes, misquoting again. Never mind, give it another few months and you might start inching towards what I actually wrote.

freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
How so? I have already said that I agree with you.


Not really. You don't agree with me that its a serious threat to our society, and you can't bring yourself to condemn it for what it is - fascism (even though you are claiming you agree that it is) - merely employing the limp wristed phrase "it goes to far". But its good if you do oppose the sentiment, but I still maintain that there is hypocrisy on your part - in the sense that anything that you perceive as even remotely fascistic by muslims or muslim apologists and we get 15 threads about it and a month long campaign about it - including wiki articles. But anything that is of the same "anti-FD-values" nature against muslims, then FD is silent unless prodded. That is, the post 2007 FD - 2007 FD was full of energy when it came to any type of fascism.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #744 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 2:47pm
 
Oh, my.  You're not suggesting that FD is a hypocrit are you?  You'll be banned next!   Grin Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95937
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #745 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 2:54pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 12:13pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
Forgive me for not taking you as representative of Islam. When you insisted that Muhammed's call to execute homosexuals is actually a statement of tolerance you lost me.


Thats because I didn't. But at least you've gone from "statement of gay pride" to merely "statement of tolerance" - thats something I guess. Maybe in another few months you'll quote what I actually said.


You see? That's what we all love about Islam.

It preaches hope.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95937
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #746 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 2:59pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 11:18am:
You'd think you'd learn.


And this is what we love about Freeedom.

It promotes education and lifelong learning.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #747 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 6:12pm
 
Quote:
Islam is a personal and non-political ideology for the vast majority of muslims living in western countries.


Do you have any evidence for this?

Quote:
Exactly. I think we worked out about half Malaysian muslims advocate secular values like freedom of religion and not applying hudud laws.


Crap. More than half of them support the most brutal aspects of hudud laws, and even more support the milder aspects.

Quote:
Not really. You don't agree with me that its a serious threat to our society, and you can't bring yourself to condemn it for what it is - fascism (even though you are claiming you agree that it is) - merely employing the limp wristed phrase "it goes to far".


I don't recall using that phrase. I wouldn't want to sound like Brian, or you. I do not see it as a credible threat that our society would 'deport' citizens. I do see a credible possibility of deporting non-citizens, and I would support that, if done for the right reasons. This is consistent with everything I have said on the matter.

Quote:
But its good if you do oppose the sentiment, but I still maintain that there is hypocrisy on your part - in the sense that anything that you perceive as even remotely fascistic by muslims or muslim apologists and we get 15 threads about it and a month long campaign about it - including wiki articles. But anything that is of the same "anti-FD-values" nature against muslims, then FD is silent unless prodded.


I have voiced my criticism plenty of times, without prodding.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #748 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 9:03pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 24th, 2014 at 6:12pm:
Crap. More than half of them support the most brutal aspects of hudud laws, and even more support the milder aspects.


Right - so would you agree that slightly less than 50% of all Malaysian muslims constitutes a "great many muslims"? Notice I never said anything about majorities, so you may as well not bother with that little red herring.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #749 - Jul 24th, 2014 at 9:34pm
 
Quote:
Right - so would you agree that slightly less than 50% of all Malaysian muslims constitutes a "great many muslims"?


Great many can mean whatever you want it to.

Quote:
Notice I never said anything about majorities, so you may as well not bother with that little red herring.


This is what I was responding to:

Quote:
I think we worked out about half Malaysian muslims advocate secular values like freedom of religion and not applying hudud laws.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 ... 188
Send Topic Print