Australian Politics Forum - spineless apologetics

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95926 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #870 - Aug 27^th, 2014 at 1:35pm freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2014 at 1:22pm: Quote: And in the same message, no less. How interesting. Do I now need to qualify the inclusion of two quotes in a post to avoid confusing you? I have to qualify what I don't say as well as what I do say? Not you, FD - them. That's Freeedom, remember?
Back to top	IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #871 - Aug 27^th, 2014 at 2:18pm

freediver wrote on Aug 27^th, 2014 at 1:22pm:

Quote:

And in the same message, no less. How interesting.

Do I now need to qualify the inclusion of two quotes in a post to avoid confusing you? I have to qualify what I don't say as well as what I do say?

The inclusion of two posts in the one message invariably means they are linked in some way FD. Strange that you've been wriggling to avoid admitting that. Now, care to explain how Brian's quote is some sort of "apologetics"? Or can't we have insight into how your mental process works, are you expecting we'll just accept your word on the matter? Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #872 - Aug 27^th, 2014 at 7:49pm

Quote:

The inclusion of two posts in the one message invariably means they are linked in some way FD.

Well done HB. I can see how you did so well on the IQ tests. Have you considered that they are linked in the sense that they are two quotes in the one message?

Quote:

Strange that you've been wriggling to avoid admitting that.

You want me to admit that I put two quotes in the same post?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #873 - Aug 28^th, 2014 at 11:06am I notice you avoided some questions FD. Care to have another go? Why did you put the two messages together in one post? What in the message from Brian constituted "apologetics" in your opinion?
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #874 - Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm Quote: Why did you put the two messages together in one post? To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #875 - Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:45pm

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

Quote:

Why did you put the two messages together in one post?

To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.

I am still confused. So, you think both were "apologetics" then FD?

So, can you explain to us EXACTLY what was "apologetic" about the posts you grouped together?

Please, keep avoiding the question. It is so amusing watching you do it. Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95926
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #876 - Aug 28^th, 2014 at 2:26pm

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

Quote:

Why did you put the two messages together in one post?

To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.

You don’t have to answer anything, FD. These people should be answering you.

Google: Taqiyya.

Back to top

IP Logged

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #877 - Aug 30^th, 2014 at 2:19pm That Freediver chop was gobbled up pretty fast by the Islamic Blow fly.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #878 - Aug 30^th, 2014 at 2:19pm Darn I missed Brian Ross's sock Hot Breath.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #879 - Aug 30^th, 2014 at 4:05pm

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:45pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

Quote:

Why did you put the two messages together in one post?

To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.

I am still confused. So, you think both were "apologetics" then FD?

So, can you explain to us EXACTLY what was "apologetic" about the posts you grouped together?

Please, keep avoiding the question. It is so amusing watching you do it. Grin

HB, I know you're a certifiable genius and all, but let's take this one step at a time. Do you understand yet why I included two quotes in the one post?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95926
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #880 - Aug 30^th, 2014 at 7:36pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30^th, 2014 at 4:05pm:

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:45pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

Quote:

Why did you put the two messages together in one post?

To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.

I am still confused. So, you think both were "apologetics" then FD?

So, can you explain to us EXACTLY what was "apologetic" about the posts you grouped together?

Please, keep avoiding the question. It is so amusing watching you do it. Grin

HB, I know you're a certifiable genius and all, but let's take this one step at a time. Do you understand yet why I included two quotes in the one post?

It’s strange, FD. Most of your links to the Pew Survey come up with this very thread.

Could it be that the Muselman has hijacked the Wiki? Talk about cunning.

I’ve heard of Taqiyya, but this is just plain sinister.

Back to top

IP Logged

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: spineless apologetics Reply #881 - Aug 30^th, 2014 at 9:54pm Get another chop did ya.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #882 - Sep 1^st, 2014 at 12:42pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30^th, 2014 at 4:05pm:

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:45pm:

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2014 at 12:33pm:

Quote:

Why did you put the two messages together in one post?

To save me making two posts. Let me know when I have answered to your satisfaction. I'd hate to leave you confused on the matter.

I am still confused. So, you think both were "apologetics" then FD?

So, can you explain to us EXACTLY what was "apologetic" about the posts you grouped together?

Please, keep avoiding the question. It is so amusing watching you do it. Grin

HB, I know you're a certifiable genius and all, but let's take this one step at a time. Do you understand yet why I included two quotes in the one post?

No, which is of course why I am asking you the reason why. Perhaps that is why I scored so well FD? I recognised a question when it was asked and answered it? Grin

Keep tap dancing. It is amusing to watch FD!

I'm waiting for DL to attack you for doing it, afterall, it's what he accuses other people of doing. Of course, we can but hope that he isn't biased. A vain hope, I know. I expect he'll just let this slide in his concerted effort to force academic excellence on us all... Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #883 - Sep 1^st, 2014 at 6:10pm

Quote:

No, which is of course why I am asking you the reason why.

Ah. Perhaps I wasn't clear the first time. I put both quotes in the one post to save myself making two posts. I can tell you are a clever guy by the penetrating questions you ask.

Quote:

I'm waiting for DL to attack you for doing it

For what? Putting two quotes in one post, or not being patient enough in explaining to you why I did it? What would you like DL to say?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: spineless apologetics
Reply #884 - Sep 2^nd, 2014 at 11:59am

freediver wrote on Sep 1^st, 2014 at 6:10pm:

Quote:

No, which is of course why I am asking you the reason why.

Ah. Perhaps I wasn't clear the first time. I put both quotes in the one post to save myself making two posts. I can tell you are a clever guy by the penetrating questions you ask.

So, both are "apologetics"?

Can you please explain why they are "apologetics"? I would like to know so that I can recognise them in the future. Rather like how I know how to recognise the Larch tree from a long distance away. Grin

Quote:

I'm waiting for DL to attack you for doing it

For what? Putting two quotes in one post, or not being patient enough in explaining to you why I did it? What would you like DL to say?

No, for avoiding answering the questions FD. I believe that is what DL defines as "tap dancing". You should be careful, he'll call you nasty names next like, "Sandalista"! Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged