perceptions_now
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender:
|
Ajax wrote on Sep 27 th, 2013 at 9:41am: perceptions_now wrote on Sep 26 th, 2013 at 6:00pm: The IEA has been around since the "Oil Crisis of the early 1970's" and its bias is towards the "BIG ENERGY CONSUMERS/PRODUCERS & OLD ENERGY (FOSSIL FUELS)!
The IPCC has been around since the late 1980's and its bias is to "protect the climate against the human impacts of CO2, which are largely derived from Fossil Fuels"!
And, because the IPCC had the IEA manage one of its Energy progams for a few years, ending in 1999, you think that the IEA would agree with the IPCC, to the detriment of its natural constituency, in BIG Energy Consumers & Producers???
Well, all I can say is, I know where the IPCC Bias is, I know where the IEA's bias is and I'm pretty sure I know where your Bias is pointing to! And frankly wherever your Bias may be coming from, your Logic is a bit Batty! Their origins are as you say, but right now this minute...!!! Big oil is on your side, not because they want to protect the world from anthropogenic CO2 emissions....!!!! They want to be a part of the carbon derivatives market as most other corporations.....!! Big oil is on your side .......................!!!!! Show me otherwise in TODAY's world..............???????? BIG Oil and the other Fossil Fuels,are on the side of BIG Oil, Coal, Gas etc!!! The IPCC is NOT on the side of BIG Oil, because BIG Oil and the other Fossil Fuels, are where a large % of the CO2 impacting Climate Change, comes from! BIG Oil & the IPCC are at opposing ends of the spectrum and as I have already said, if you think otherwise, then your logic is Batty!
|