viewpoint wrote on Sep 23
rd, 2013 at 2:12pm:
She does not hold patents to her work, and does not make rash statements to garner publicity. Grants are not made to individuals, and they have to be accounted for in every aspect of the research, so your statements are somewhat on the naive side don't you think?
As with 99.9% of climate scientists, they just happen to be saying something, that for whatever reason you don't want to agree with.
Quote:Incidentally, the elitist scum bit sounds more like Mr Grey the Anarchist. My daughter in fact spent nine years working hard to get her doctorate from sixteen years old onward, so I hardly think she can be referred to as elitist.
As I said Kudos, I'm well aware of the self discipline required for such work, she is a credit to you & her mother.
Quote:Well not by anybody who isn't a socialist, unionist muppet, or a freaky anarchist.
Ironically the only people I've heard use the word ELITIST as a derogatory term for well educated are republicans in America & idiots here in this country.
It was a FOX News standard for quite a while.
Hardly socialist let alone anarcist, just another example of conservative double-think.