Australian Politics Forum - Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #75 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 10:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:59pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:52pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:45pm:

...
I'm sceptical of the AGW theory ...

What is the rational basis of your scepticism? If you are a true sceptic, then you'll have no problem substantiating your scepticism.

...
There's not enough reliable, credible, or convincing evidence to support the AGW theory.
...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Is your denial rational? You've certainly failed to substantiate it.

Consensus is not part of the scientific method.

This is science, not a popularity contest.

Nobody expects you to understand that though.

Yet you don't understand the science, greggery. So while the scientific community is virtually certain you gloat about knowing what a hypothesis is.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #76 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:05pm

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:12pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:04pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

You didn't answer my question.
...

Of course not.

White flag accepted.
...

Nice try.

Substantiate or be forever known as a troll.

CONSENSUS is not evidence
CONSENSUS is not proof
CONSENSUS is opinion

ergo, consensus carries no weight in a question of science.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #77 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:21pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:19pm:

Rider wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

Clearly your researching skills don't extend to google (give it a go, even old people can use it)...still hanging onto the 97% nonsense from Cooke...wake up and smell the roses old matey

If I can google it, so can you. Why should I allow myself to be roped in by your time-wasting tricks?

Could the AGW theory be wrong?

Yes or no?

What are you running from?

Both major political parties agree AGW is real and action is required to reduce emissions by 5% on 2000 levels.....People who dent AGW have no political support and are not supported by reputable organisations like NASA the CSIRO and IPCC who provide detailed analysis of their findings to support AGW.....All that matters is which policy will work!!!

Roll Eyes

which part of that constitutes proof? are you even aware that NASA had an internal bunfight on its hands over Dr Hansen's fraudulent use of NASA information?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74280
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #78 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:05pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:12pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:04pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

You didn't answer my question.
...

Of course not.

White flag accepted.
...

Nice try.

Substantiate or be forever known as a troll.

CONSENSUS is not evidence
CONSENSUS is not proof
CONSENSUS is opinion

ergo, consensus carries no weight in a question of science.

but consensus does give what they say more weight than anything you can come with.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #79 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:07pm

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:43pm:

...
There is the very real possibility that AGW is not real.
...

The vast majority of the best qualified say that it's real. So what is the probability?

300 scientist lined up and wrote a book about Einstein debunking his theories. it was one against 300.

Wanna take a punt as to who was right?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #80 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:10pm

MOTR wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 10:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:59pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:52pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:45pm:

...
I'm sceptical of the AGW theory ...

What is the rational basis of your scepticism? If you are a true sceptic, then you'll have no problem substantiating your scepticism.

...
There's not enough reliable, credible, or convincing evidence to support the AGW theory.
...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Is your denial rational? You've certainly failed to substantiate it.

Consensus is not part of the scientific method.

This is science, not a popularity contest.

Nobody expects you to understand that though.

Yet you don't understand the science, greggery. So while the scientific community is virtually certain you gloat about knowing what a hypothesis is.

as long as you exclude the growing shouts of alarm from scientists about the ACC hysteria. But of course... as soon as someone debunks ACC you immediately dismiss them as a climate scientist therefore being able to maintain your 97% fallacy.

before long there will be 5 scientist left who believe in ACC and you will still claim 100% consensus.

you are a fool who refuses to even acknowledge the existence of other research.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #81 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:11pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:05pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:12pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:04pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

You didn't answer my question.
...

Of course not.

White flag accepted.
...

Nice try.

Substantiate or be forever known as a troll.

CONSENSUS is not evidence
CONSENSUS is not proof
CONSENSUS is opinion

ergo, consensus carries no weight in a question of science.

but consensus does give what they say more weight than anything you can come with.

The tale The Emperors New Clothes was written just for simpletons like you.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #82 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:15pm

I've given up with climate change believers. As Andrew Bolt and Dennis Jensen were saying on the Bolt report yesterday, climate change believers take anything to be 'proof' of climate change, because of the cognitive dissonance involved in admitting that maybe they've been wrong all along. It's so hot, that's because of global warming it's very cold, that's because of global warming, there are droughts, that's because of global warming, there are floodimg rains, that's because of global warming.

NO, that's because the climate and temperature change day to day, it's not because the earth is warming.

It's a shame that more in the Coalitiin don't stand up and admit that they don't believe in it, like dennis Jensen. I can tell you, there are many that don't, they just don't have the guts to say it in public.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74280
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #83 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:17pm

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:05pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:12pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:04pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

You didn't answer my question.
...

Of course not.

White flag accepted.
...

Nice try.

Substantiate or be forever known as a troll.

CONSENSUS is not evidence
CONSENSUS is not proof
CONSENSUS is opinion

ergo, consensus carries no weight in a question of science.

but consensus does give what they say more weight than anything you can come with.

The tale The Emperors New Clothes was written just for simpletons like you.

nope, the emperors new clothes was what happens when an official didn't want to hear the truth ... good analogy, describes Abbott to a T.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 136594 Gender:	Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki. Reply #84 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:25pm MOTR wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 10:23pm: Yet you don't understand the science, greggery. au contraire I understand it all too well.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20165
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #85 - Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:56pm

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:21pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:19pm:

Rider wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

Clearly your researching skills don't extend to google (give it a go, even old people can use it)...still hanging onto the 97% nonsense from Cooke...wake up and smell the roses old matey

If I can google it, so can you. Why should I allow myself to be roped in by your time-wasting tricks?

Could the AGW theory be wrong?

Yes or no?

What are you running from?

Both major political parties agree AGW is real and action is required to reduce emissions by 5% on 2000 levels.....People who dent AGW have no political support and are not supported by reputable organisations like NASA the CSIRO and IPCC who provide detailed analysis of their findings to support AGW.....All that matters is which policy will work!!!

Roll Eyes

which part of that constitutes proof? are you even aware that NASA had an internal bunfight on its hands over Dr Hansen's fraudulent use of NASA information?

Proof of what Longy......Tony Abbott has committed to the same targets as the ALP so what is your point.....Many organisations have been questioned over its actions but it does not condemn the whole organisation as corrupt does it.....Every Government in the world accepts AGW is real and action is required to curb our carbon emissions.....Why do you think you know more than the vast majority of people who have the responsibility to act on what they believe is real???

Huh

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20165
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #86 - Sep 24^th, 2013 at 12:17am

matty wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:15pm:

I've given up with climate change believers. As Andrew Bolt and Dennis Jensen were saying on the Bolt report yesterday, climate change believers take anything to be 'proof' of climate change, because of the cognitive dissonance involved in admitting that maybe they've been wrong all along. It's so hot, that's because of global warming it's very cold, that's because of global warming, there are droughts, that's because of global warming, there are floodimg rains, that's because of global warming.

NO, that's because the climate and temperature change day to day, it's not because the earth is warming.

It's a shame that more in the Coalitiin don't stand up and admit that they don't believe in it, like dennis Jensen. I can tell you, there are many that don't, they just don't have the guts to say it in public.

What a load of crap.....Isolated weather events do not determine the extent of Global Warming as any idiot would know.....Temperatures are taken over the whole globe that clearly shows a warming trend that is attributed to human carbon emissions.....It is sceptics who use isolated weather events to deny the science of Global Warming as you have done above.....How can anyone believe Andrew Bolt or Dennis Jensen knows more than NASA and the CSIRO???

Roll Eyes

Believe one who has proved it. Believe an expert.
Virgil (70 BC - 19 BC), Aeneid

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #87 - Sep 24^th, 2013 at 5:02am

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 11:06pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:21pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:19pm:

Rider wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:13pm:

# wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 9:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2013 at 8:56pm:

... So far, no credible or reliable evidence exists to support the theory. ...

The vast majority of the best qualified say otherwise. Scepticism is a rational philosophy. What is the rational basis of your denial?

Clearly your researching skills don't extend to google (give it a go, even old people can use it)...still hanging onto the 97% nonsense from Cooke...wake up and smell the roses old matey

If I can google it, so can you. Why should I allow myself to be roped in by your time-wasting tricks?

Could the AGW theory be wrong?

Yes or no?

What are you running from?

Both major political parties agree AGW is real and action is required to reduce emissions by 5% on 2000 levels.....People who dent AGW have no political support and are not supported by reputable organisations like NASA the CSIRO and IPCC who provide detailed analysis of their findings to support AGW.....All that matters is which policy will work!!!

Roll Eyes

which part of that constitutes proof? are you even aware that NASA had an internal bunfight on its hands over Dr Hansen's fraudulent use of NASA information?

You'll also find this statement on the NASA website.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Quote:

Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities,1and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

Quote:

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

American Association for the Advancement of Science
"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3

American Chemical Society
"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4

American Geophysical Union
"The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system — including the temperatures of the atmosphere, land and ocean, the extent of sea ice and mountain glaciers, the sea level, the distribution of precipitation, and the length of seasons — are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007)5

American Medical Association
"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6

American Meteorological Society
"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7

American Physical Society
"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8

The Geological Society of America
"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 24^th, 2013 at 5:15am by MOTR »

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #88 - Sep 24^th, 2013 at 5:06am

(Scientific Organizations That Hold the Position That Climate Change Has Been Caused by Human Action)

Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile
Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa, Portugal
Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana
Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela
Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico
Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia
Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru
Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Académie des Sciences, France
Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada
Academy of Athens
Academy of Science of Mozambique
Academy of Science of South Africa
Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS)
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy of Sciences of Moldova
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt
Academy of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy
Africa Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science
African Academy of Sciences
Albanian Academy of Sciences
Amazon Environmental Research Institute
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Anthropological Association
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of State Climatologists (AASC)
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Fisheries Society
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Institute of Physics
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Agronomy
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Australian Academy of Science
Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Australian Institute of Physics
Australian Marine Sciences Association
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Botanical Society of America
Brazilian Academy of Sciences
British Antarctic Survey
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
California Academy of Sciences
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Canadian Association of Physicists
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Geophysical Union
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Society of Soil Science
Canadian Society of Zoologists
Caribbean Academy of Sciences views
Center for International Forestry Research
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia)
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences
Crop Science Society of America
Cuban Academy of Sciences
Delegation of the Finnish Academies of Science and Letters
Ecological Society of America
Ecological Society of Australia
Environmental Protection Agency
European Academy of Sciences and Arts
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
Federation of American Scientists
French Academy of Sciences
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of Australia
Geological Society of London
Georgian Academy of Sciences
German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Indian National Science Academy
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology
Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK
InterAcademy Council
International Alliance of Research Universities
International Arctic Science Committee
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Council for Science
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
International Research Institute for Climate and Society
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
International Union of Pure and Applied Physics
Islamic World Academy of Sciences
Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Korean Academy of Science and Technology
Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts
l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Latin American Academy of Sciences
Latvian Academy of Sciences
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
Madagascar National Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences
Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology
Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts
National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Argentina
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia
National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic
National Academy of Sciences, Sri Lanka
National Academy of Sciences, United States of America
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
National Association of State Foresters
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Council of Engineers Australia
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Research Council
National Science Foundation

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Tony's climate agenda worrying, says David Suzuki.
Reply #89 - Sep 24^th, 2013 at 5:07am

Natural England
Natural Environment Research Council, UK
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Network of African Science Academies
New York Academy of Sciences
Nicaraguan Academy of Sciences
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters
Oklahoma Climatological Survey
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Pakistan Academy of Sciences
Palestine Academy for Science and Technology
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Polish Academy of Sciences
Romanian Academy
Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium
Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences of Spain
Royal Astronomical Society, UK
Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
Royal Irish Academy
Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Royal Scientific Society of Jordan
Royal Society of Canada
Royal Society of Chemistry, UK
Royal Society of the United Kingdom
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
Science and Technology, Australia
Science Council of Japan
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Society for Ecological Restoration International
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of American Foresters
Society of Biology (UK)
Society of Biology, UK
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Sudanese National Academy of Science
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
The Wildlife Society (international)
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Forestry Congress
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged