Australian Politics Forum - populartechnology.net

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #120 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:36pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:23pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 5:29pm:

You discuss it with Poptech. Here's a nice reference from his webpage:

I am not here to discuss 911, I am here to discuss climate change alarm and on this Ajax and myself agree. Your anecdotes are simply a distraction.

Hi PT

Well said mate, I support you 100%.

BTW I think your site

http://www.populartechnology.net/

is fantastic and I would put it up there with Jonova & WUWT.

Keep the good work up.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #121 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:53pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:14pm:

# wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:22pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:33am:

...
2. There is no such "vast majority of the best qualified" ...

In which peer-reviewed journal was that study published?

Huh? The burden of proof is on you.

Please provide the comprehensive poll of every scientist on the planet to support your statement.

Can you refer to ONE scientific institute or society on a domestic or international level that refutes the high school level science that underpins AGW?

Even the fossil fuel corporations united in 2003 to release a joint statement that human induced global warming and its resultant changes in climate and other effects such as rising sea levels etc, is a serious urgent global issue which requires major international mitigation and action.

Can you explain why the major fossil fuel and mining corporations would make such as joint public statement?

AGW denialist crack pots must feel very lonely and desperate don't you think batman?

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #122 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 3:03pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:36pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:23pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 5:29pm:

You discuss it with Poptech. Here's a nice reference from his webpage:

I am not here to discuss 911, I am here to discuss climate change alarm and on this Ajax and myself agree. Your anecdotes are simply a distraction.

Hi PT

Well said mate, I support you 100%.

BTW I think your site

populartechnology.net

is fantastic and I would put it up there with Jonova & WUWT.

Keep the good work up.

Same to you, I support all AGW skeptics against alarmist insanity. And thanks, I am glad you like the site.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #123 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 3:09pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:53pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:14pm:

# wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:22pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:33am:

...
2. There is no such "vast majority of the best qualified" ...

In which peer-reviewed journal was that study published?

Huh? The burden of proof is on you.

Please provide the comprehensive poll of every scientist on the planet to support your statement.

Can you refer to ONE scientific institute or society on a domestic or international level that refutes the high school level science that underpins AGW?

Appeal to authority logical fallacy and a strawman. I am arguing against ACC/AGW Alarm.

You have still failed to provide, the comprehensive poll of every scientist on the planet to support your position.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:53pm:

Even the fossil fuel corporations united in 2003 to release a joint statement that human induced global warming and its resultant changes in climate and other effects such as rising sea levels etc, is a serious urgent global issue which requires major international mitigation and action.

Can you explain why the major fossil fuel and mining corporations would make such as joint public statement?

What statement?

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:53pm:

AGW denialist crack pots must feel very lonely and desperate don't you think batman?

Who denies that their is a scientific hypothesis called AGW?

Back to top

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #124 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:22pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:14pm:

# wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:22pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 1:33am:

...
2. There is no such "vast majority of the best qualified" ...

In which peer-reviewed journal was that study published?

Huh? The burden of proof is on you.
...

My question related to the study which establishes that there's no consensus.

In answer to your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists%27_views_on_climate_change. You denied it before, now substantiate your denial.

Back to top

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #125 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:25pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:15pm:

...
So you cannot backup your libelous claim? ...

So send in the lawyers.

Whine though you no doubt will, the answer remains: # wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 3:46pm:

...cyberstalking
Quote:

... the attacker harasses a victim using electronic communication, such as e-mail or instant messaging (IM), or messages posted to a Web site or a discussion group. A cyberstalker relies upon the anonymity afforded by the Internet to allow them to stalk their victim without being detected. ...

Much like sexual harassment, the crime may not be in what the perpetrator thinks they're doing, but in how the victim feels about it. Does compiling information and posting it in a particular context qualify? That depends on the victim's perception.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 28^th, 2013 at 12:04pm by # »

IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #126 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:37pm Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 4:34pm: ... I have no idea what a "denialist" is ... A denialist is one who denies all that is not consistent with their world view. For example: Quote: All counted papers must ... support a skeptic argument against ACC/AGW or ACC/AGW Alarm.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:49pm by # » IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #127 - Sep 27^th, 2013 at 5:24pm Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 3:03pm: Same to you, I support all AGW skeptics against alarmist insanity. And thanks, I am glad you like the site. I like the part where you debunk 911 Conspiracy theories.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #128 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:48am

Ajax wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:36pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:23pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 5:29pm:

You discuss it with Poptech. Here's a nice reference from his webpage:

I am not here to discuss 911, I am here to discuss climate change alarm and on this Ajax and myself agree. Your anecdotes are simply a distraction.

Hi PT

Well said mate, I support you 100%.

BTW I think your site

http://www.populartechnology.net/

is fantastic and I would put it up there with

Jonova

& WUWT.

Keep the good work up.

The kiss of death, lol Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #129 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 10:55am

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:23pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 5:29pm:

You discuss it with Poptech. Here's a nice reference from his webpage:

I am not here to discuss 911, I am here to discuss climate change alarm and on this Ajax and myself agree. Your anecdotes are simply a distraction.

Ok, I was merely pointing out that your new found buddy:
- Is a 911 denier
- Is a Moon landing denier
- Denies that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK
- Believes that Elvis is alive.
- Believes that the banking sector owns Exxon.
- Required three pages of explanation before he finally understood the distinction between accuracy and precision.
- Gets calculations wrong by a factor of a million and then calls other posters stupid when they point out that an area of 1 square kilometers that is 1 metre high is not 1 cubic kilometre.

I could go on, but I don't want to embarass him. Grin

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #130 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:42pm # wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:22pm: My question related to the study which establishes that there's no consensus. I agree there is no consensus.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #131 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:45pm

# wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:25pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 2:15pm:

...
So you cannot backup your libelous claim? ...

So send in the lawyers.

Do you conceed that you cannot back up your libelous claim?

# wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:25pm:

Whine though you no doubt will, the answer remains: # wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 3:46pm:

...cyberstalking
Quote:

... the attacker harasses a victim using electronic communication, such as e-mail or instant messaging (IM), or messages posted to a Web site or a discussion group. A cyberstalker relies upon the anonymity afforded by the Internet to allow them to stalk their victim without being detected. ...

Much like sexual harassment, the crime may not be in what the perpetrator thinks they're doing, but in how the victim feels about it. Does compiling information and posting it in a particular context qualify? That depends on the victim's perception.

That is not a dictionary, please provide a definition from a dictionary (Not Wikipedia). Are you unable to read my posts clearly?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:51pm by Poptech »

IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #132 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:49pm # wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 4:37pm: Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 4:34pm: ... I have no idea what a "denialist" is ... A denialist is one who denies all that is not consistent with their world view... There is no such definition. Please provide a dictionary (not Wikipedia) definition on this word.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #133 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:52pm muso wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 5:24pm: Poptech wrote on Sep 27^th, 2013 at 3:03pm: Same to you, I support all AGW skeptics against alarmist insanity. And thanks, I am glad you like the site. I like the part where you debunk 911 Conspiracy theories. How is the trolling going?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #134 - Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:53pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:45pm:

That is not a dictionary, please provide a definition from a dictionary (Not Wikipedia). Are you unable to read my posts clearly?

Definition of denialist in English

denialist
Pronunciation: /dɪˈnʌɪ(ə)lɪst/
noun

a person who refuses to admit the truth of a concept or proposition that is supported by the majority of scientific or historical evidence:the small minority of very vocal climate change denialists [as modifier]:the denialist view.

The Oxford Dictionary
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/denialist

Maybe you prefer the Collins English Dictionary:

http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/denialist

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 28^th, 2013 at 1:58pm by muso »

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged