Australian Politics Forum - populartechnology.net

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #165 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 11:36am Poptech wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 3:13pm: Does AR5 include every peer-reviewed paper published on climate change since AR4? Just on this point. If it did include every peer reviewed paper since AR4, the predictions would be much more extreme. The panel has erred on the conservative side.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #166 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 12:29pm

In general people should interest themselves about the pseudo science that the IPCC continually cough up to tax all peoples on the air we breath.

If for no other reason being that it will affect their hip pocket like no other science has before.

Investigative Journalism at its best

5:55 AGW consensus

8:15 IPCC consensus procedure

10:45 IPCC role in climate science

12:45 Investigative Journalism

14:10 IPCC nonsense

15:00 Who am I (Donna)

16:20 Top scientists at IPCC which also includes graduates and under graduates.

17:05 Graduate students help write IPCC report

17:35 IPCC makes graduate students lead authors.

18:50 Malaria section written by undergraduate who was also a contributing author.

20:50 Unqualified scientists are included in perr review group.

21:30 Green Activists chosen as lead authors.

23:00 Greenpeace & World Wild Life fund activists selected as lead Authors at IPCC.

26:00 two thirds of chapters in IPCC report have between one and eight people with the World Wild Life fund.

27:50 IPCC gives political opinion not science fact.

29.33 All IPCC peer review literature is a lie, IPCC uses non peer reviewed literature to stress their point.

31:15 Only 50% - 35% of chapters are peer reviewed.

33:20 End of investigation leads to conclusions that 30% of journals sited by IPCC are not peer reviewed, they happen to be green literature.

35:00 No scientists working for IPCC have come out through a letter or an email stating unequivocally what the IPCC claim.

36:00 IPCC scientific literature doesn't follow IPCC written rules.

38:40 Conflict of interest.

39.35 UN is a political body spreading science.

40:30 Real reasons the IPCC exists, to mix politics with science.

41:30 IPCC political process not scientific process, science gets re-written in political terms.

44:15 Carbon taxes & ETS systems created for a problem we're not sure even exists.

46:00 Educate yourself about climate change.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #167 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 4:33pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 12:29pm:

In general people should interest themselves about the pseudo science that the IPCC

You wouldn't recognise pseudoscience unless it was explained to you piecemeal over 10 pages. Even so, you still beleve Willy Soon rather tha the designer of the satellites and the real experts in the field.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #168 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 5:06pm

# wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 3:37pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:18pm:

... It is an absolute lie that I have ever "cyberstalked" anyone making your accusation libelous. It is not illegal to compile and post contact information that is available in the public domain online. What I have done on multiple occasions is demonstrate the computer illiteracy of online bullies by providing them with this information.

From the rules of this forum Quote:

OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

Sounds a lot like what you boast of doing "on multiple occasions", doesn't it?

What would motivate such behaviour, but a desire to bully and intimidate?

poptech AINT AFRAID TO USE THE OLD SILENT TREATMENT IS HE/SHE/IT????????? Cheesy

(HAVE WE GOT ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ON THE OLD GENDER OF THIS HERE TRYHARD INTERNET FASCIST????)

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #169 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 5:36pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 5:06pm: poptech AINT AFRAID TO USE THE OLD SILENT TREATMENT IS HE/SHE/IT????????? (HAVE WE GOT ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ON THE OLD GENDER OF THIS HERE TRYHARD INTERNET FASCIST????) Sorry can't help you there.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Oct 4^th, 2013 at 9:41am by freediver » 1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #170 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 8:52pm

There is nothing to debunk on Popular Technology because there is nothing on climate, except character assassination, opinion and appeal to authority.

An example is this:
Quote:

"Given that the evidence strongly implies that anthropogenic warming has been greatly exaggerated, the basis for alarm due to such warming is similarly diminished." - Richard S. Lindzen

Richard Lindzen is notably unspectacular for his ability to predict future temperatures. He was the proponent of the now discredited "Iris Effect".

http://www.skepticalscience.com/lindzen-illusion-2-lindzen-vs-hansen-1980s.html

As far as I can see, the data is correct.

Also here:

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/09/480733/a-cloudy-day-for-climate-skep...

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #171 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 9:28pm Hey Poptech, since you're a computer tech, what do you think of the Dell CompTIA A+ course? Worth doing?
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #172 - Sep 29^th, 2013 at 10:51pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 12:29pm:

In general people should interest themselves about the pseudo science that the IPCC continually cough up to tax all peoples on the air we breath.

So let me see if I can summarise your sociopathic neurotic paranoia.

The global scientific community has fabricated results, theories, predictions, peer reviewed publications etc., just so some countries can sneak in a tax on carbon, which somehow will ruin everything and everyone in the known universe.

A "global scam" which has even suckered in the big fossil fuel corporations themselves, who have accepted the high school level science that underpins AGW and who have recommended urgent action to be taken internationally in order the mitigate the effects of climate change.

Do you realise how ridiculous your stance appears in public?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 30^th, 2013 at 6:09am by muso »

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #173 - Sep 30^th, 2013 at 9:22am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 10:51pm:

Ajax wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 12:29pm:

In general people should interest themselves about the pseudo science that the IPCC continually cough up to tax all peoples on the air we breath.

So let me see if I can summarise your sociopathic neurotic paranoia.

The global scientific community has fabricated results, theories, predictions, peer reviewed publications etc., just so some countries can sneak in a tax on carbon, which somehow will ruin everything and everyone in the known universe.

A "global scam" which has even suckered in the big fossil fuel corporations themselves, who have accepted the high school level science that underpins AGW and who have recommended urgent action to be taken internationally in order the mitigate the effects of climate change.

Do you realise how ridiculous your stance appears in public?

If you cannot tell science from fantasy then what can I say to you.

So chimp where is the hidden heat in the deep ocean layers or is it on the top ocean layers.......????????

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #174 - Sep 30^th, 2013 at 11:56am

muso wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 6:04pm:

...
Sigh. I can see that you like dictionaries.
...

I've been wondering about that.

A rational question would be something along the lines: "[some dictionary] defines denialist thus: ... What have I done which meets that definition?" Poptech's demand that the one answering provide the definition seems more than a little queer to me.

I guess that it's intended to intimidate. Perhaps, by looking honestly at the issue, I inadvertently circumvented his intent .

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #175 - Sep 30^th, 2013 at 12:10pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 30^th, 2013 at 9:22am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 10:51pm:

Ajax wrote on Sep 29^th, 2013 at 12:29pm:

In general people should interest themselves about the pseudo science that the IPCC continually cough up to tax all peoples on the air we breath.

So let me see if I can summarise your sociopathic neurotic paranoia.

The global scientific community has fabricated results, theories, predictions, peer reviewed publications etc., just so some countries can sneak in a tax on carbon, which somehow will ruin everything and everyone in the known universe.

A "global scam" which has even suckered in the big fossil fuel corporations themselves, who have accepted the high school level science that underpins AGW and who have recommended urgent action to be taken internationally in order the mitigate the effects of climate change.

Do you realise how ridiculous your stance appears in public?

If you cannot tell science from fantasy then what can I say to you.

So chimp where is the hidden heat in the deep ocean layers or is it on the top ocean layers.......????????

what heat?

has the thermal retention of the earth been rising over the past 60 years?

I thought you said its all natural variation and a global conspiracy by the tax merchants

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged