Australian Politics Forum - populartechnology.net

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #15 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 6:53am Poptech wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:15pm: ... Do not confuse privacy with secrecy. ... Is secretiveness consistent with credibility?
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 26^th, 2013 at 9:13am by # » IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #16 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:00am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:59am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:18am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:42pm:

Their brand of truth seems to struggle against the rigor and transparency of a simple scientific peer review process

This is incorrect as every counted paper on the 1100+ paper list has been peer-reviewed.

Do any of these papers explain the warming trend over the past 50 or 60 years?

Yes, there are extensive sections on cosmic rays and solar forcings.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #17 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:01am

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 6:53am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:15pm:

... Do not confuse privacy with secrecy.
...

Is secretiveness consistent with credibility?

I have no idea what you are talking about. Our personal information is private but our published information is all verifiable, as it is all fully cited and sourced.

Back to top

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #18 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:05am

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:01am:

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 6:53am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:15pm:

... Do not confuse privacy with secrecy.
...

Is secretiveness consistent with credibility?

I have no idea what you are talking about. ...

Why should I trust a shadowy, secretive mob, of unknown allegiances?

Back to top

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #19 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:31am

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:59am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:18am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:42pm:

Their brand of truth seems to struggle against the rigor and transparency of a simple scientific peer review process

This is incorrect as every counted paper on the 1100+ paper list has been peer-reviewed.

Do any of these papers explain the warming trend over the past 50 or 60 years?

Yes, there are extensive sections on cosmic rays and solar forcings.

Do Cosmic Rays change the frequency of radar transmissions?

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #20 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:35am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:59am:

...
Do any of these papers explain ...

Chimp, this mob has spent years accumulating internally consistent teachings. Much like a religious cult. Be careful not to drink the Kool-Aid.

For me, the most cogent warnings lie in their secretiveness.
The claim is privacy;
- is the secrecy a necessary aspect of privacy or;
- is privacy a cover for the secrecy?

Either way, the phrase "honest and open" exists in that form for good reasons. There comes a time when a choice must be made between secrecy and credibility.

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #21 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:39am

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:00am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:59am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:18am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:42pm:

Their brand of truth seems to struggle against the rigor and transparency of a simple scientific peer review process

This is incorrect as every counted paper on the 1100+ paper list has been peer-reviewed.

Do any of these papers explain the warming trend over the past 50 or 60 years?

Yes, there are extensive sections on cosmic rays and solar forcings.

Do you know the extent of thermal retention within the earth's systems that is directly attributable to the greenhouse effect?

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #22 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:55am

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:05am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:01am:

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 6:53am:

Poptech wrote on Sep 25^th, 2013 at 10:15pm:

... Do not confuse privacy with secrecy.
...

Is secretiveness consistent with credibility?

I have no idea what you are talking about. ...

Why should I trust a shadowy, secretive mob, of unknown allegiances?

So now we are a "shadowy, secretive mob", lol? Your conspiracy theories are fascinating. You have no reason to trust anything I say, which is why everything is fully cited and sourced.

Back to top

IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10982 Australia Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #23 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:55am muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:31am: Do Cosmic Rays change the frequency of radar transmissions? You bet they do...!!!!! Its written in the altimeter literature.....!!!!!
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #24 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:57am

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:35am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:59am:

...
Do any of these papers explain ...

Chimp, this mob has spent years accumulating internally consistent teachings. Much like a religious cult. Be careful not to drink the Kool-Aid.

For me, the most cogent warnings lie in their secretiveness.
The claim is privacy;
- is the secrecy a necessary aspect of privacy or;
- is privacy a cover for the secrecy?

Either way, the phrase "honest and open" exists in that form for good reasons. There comes a time when a choice must be made between secrecy and credibility.

This is it........?????

All your searching has yielded this insignificant bit of information......?????

I wonder what a judge in a court room would say.....!!!!

I know he would say..................

Take this hash from my court room cause he's a waste of space & time.......!!!!

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #25 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:28pm Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:39am: Do you know the extent of thermal retention within the earth's systems that is directly attributable to the greenhouse effect? This is widely debated.
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #26 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm Ajax wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:55am: muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:31am: Do Cosmic Rays change the frequency of radar transmissions? You bet they do...!!!!! Its written in the altimeter literature.....!!!!! Shh! I'm asking Poptarts.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #27 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm: Shh! I'm asking Poptarts. Ah, we are back to childish name calling.
Back to top	IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #28 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:47pm Apparently populartechnology.net is just one person. Probably explains the need for secrecy. I wonder about those other names on the site though. Imaginary friends, perhaps?
Back to top	IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #29 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:50pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm:

Shh! I'm asking Poptarts.

Ah, we are back to childish name calling.

I know, its really quite pathetic how few the number of AGW denialist puppet clown freaks there are in their religious cults. Although I must admit that the potency of their stench and foul putrid odours is well over 0.76 mS/s.N

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged