Australian Politics Forum - populartechnology.net

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #30 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:55pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:50pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm:

Shh! I'm asking Poptarts.

Ah, we are back to childish name calling.

I know, its really quite pathetic how few the number of AGW denialist puppet clown freaks there are in their religious cults. Although I must admit that the potency of their stench and foul putrid odours is well over 0.76 mS/s.N

At what temperature? Conductivity is usually measured with reference to a temperature.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #31 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:57pm

Another response: Quote:

As far as I know, there's only one person behind Popular Technology - a particularly virulent person. He's been banned from many websites because of his inflammatory tone and tendency to cyberstalk people he engages with (e.g., find out their personal address and phone number and post it in the discussion forum). My advice: I wouldn't give the guy the time of day.

That is consistent with his behaviour here.

Back to top

IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #32 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:04pm Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm: muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm: Shh! I'm asking Poptarts. Ah, we are back to childish name calling. OK. I apologise. I was just eating a poptart. Now will you answer the question? Do you have any scientific training?
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #33 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:06pm Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:50pm: I know, its really quite pathetic how few the number of AGW denialist puppet clown freaks there are in their religious cults. Although I must admit that the potency of their stench and foul putrid odours is well over 0.76 mS/s.N You mad bro?
Back to top	IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #34 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:09pm

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:04pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm:

Shh! I'm asking Poptarts.

Ah, we are back to childish name calling.

OK. I apologise. I was just eating a poptart. Now will you answer the question?

Do you have any scientific training?

Can cosmic rays cause soft errors in DRAM?

Back to top

IP Logged

Poptech Junior Member Offline Posts: 95 U.S. Gender:	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #35 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:13pm # wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:47pm: Apparently populartechnology.net is just one person. Probably explains the need for secrecy. I wonder about those other names on the site though. Imaginary friends, perhaps? Nope, the other contributing editors all exist but only Karl is a frequent contributor besides myself.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poptech

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 95
U.S.
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #36 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:18pm

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:57pm:

Another response: Quote:

As far as I know, there's only one person behind Popular Technology - a particularly virulent person. He's been banned from many websites because of his inflammatory tone and tendency to cyberstalk people he engages with (e.g., find out their personal address and phone number and post it in the discussion forum). My advice: I wouldn't give the guy the time of day.

That is consistent with his behaviour here.

Incorrect, there is one editor myself and 3 contributing editors. I have only been banned from a handful of alarmist and left wing websites for their inability to debate me. It is an absolute lie that I have ever "cyberstalked" anyone making your accusation libelous. It is not illegal to compile and post contact information that is available in the public domain online. What I have done on multiple occasions is demonstrate the computer illiteracy of online bullies by providing them with this information.

Back to top

IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #37 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:19pm muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:04pm: ... Do you have any scientific training? If the site is to be believed: no.
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #38 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:22pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:18pm:

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:57pm:

Another response: Quote:

As far as I know, there's only one person behind Popular Technology - a particularly virulent person. He's been banned from many websites because of his inflammatory tone and tendency to cyberstalk people he engages with (e.g., find out their personal address and phone number and post it in the discussion forum). My advice: I wouldn't give the guy the time of day.

That is consistent with his behaviour here.

Incorrect, there is one editor myself and 3 contributing editors. I have only been banned from a handful of alarmist and left wing websites for their inability to debate me. It is an absolute lie that I have ever "cyberstalked" anyone making your accusation libelous. It is not illegal to compile and post contact information that is available in the public domain online. What I have done on multiple occasions is demonstrate the computer illiteracy of online bullies by providing them with this information.

Do you see how your reaction might validate the Quote:

... inflammatory tone and tendency to cyberstalk ...

comment?

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #39 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:24pm muso wrote on Sep 24^th, 2013 at 5:30pm: # - Just go by the validity or otherwise of the arguments they present. It's not really relevant who's behind it. Exactly: science is simply feedback and therefore only fact can prove useful to its continued story!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #40 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:27pm

# wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:57pm:

Another response: Quote:

As far as I know, there's only one person behind Popular Technology - a particularly virulent person. He's been banned from many websites because of his inflammatory tone and tendency to cyberstalk people he engages with (e.g., find out their personal address and phone number and post it in the discussion forum). My advice: I wouldn't give the guy the time of day.

That is consistent with his behaviour here.

What is this dangerous characters name on this forum ?? Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #41 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:29pm

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:09pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:04pm:

Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 1:17pm:

muso wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:37pm:

Shh! I'm asking Poptarts.

Ah, we are back to childish name calling.

OK. I apologise. I was just eating a poptart. Now will you answer the question?

Do you have any scientific training?

Can cosmic rays cause soft errors in DRAM?

Noice: what is the answer to this question??

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: populartechnology.net
Reply #42 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:30pm

That's a shame. You see, I was just wondering if there is any money in it. I'm qualified in Environmental Science and Chemistry, and I'm really starting to find that some of Ajax's arguments about the Ocean bulging and the rainfall over australia are very convincing. (Is he a friend of yours?) I worked on General Circulation Models as part of my thesis, so I'm sure I would be a good catch so to speak.

I'm pretty well versed on the Classical Mythology too, and sang in quite a few G&S productions in my time, and I'm really good at Photoshop, so as far as graphs from Uranus are concerned, I could easily do that. Overall, I think I could probably do the Monkton bit quite well if he ever carks it.

How much would it be worth if I switched sides?

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: populartechnology.net Reply #43 - Sep 26^th, 2013 at 2:33pm Poptech wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 12:28pm: Chimp_Logic wrote on Sep 26^th, 2013 at 11:39am: Do you know the extent of thermal retention within the earth's systems that is directly attributable to the greenhouse effect? This is widely debated. ..and vaguely answered: DON'T YOU KNOW THAT ALL GOOD SCIENCE HAS ERROR VALUE??
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged