ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 9^th, 2013 at 12:27am:



Really?

Of course you'll supply a link to me saying this.

We all await your post.

Thank you.

I see you started by doctoring my quote.  What I actually said was "Oh and should I debate you GP.. What do you know about climate science.  Are you a climate scientist?" So you want to answer the question .  What do you know about climate science?  Are you a climate scientist?"

Your full of poo Spartacus......????

What do you know about climate change....!!!!!

Who appointed you expert....................?????

Can you even understand what the IPCC is saying.........???

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 9^th, 2013 at 12:39am:


Considerably more than you (obviously), muso, Chimp, and DRAH (for starters).


ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 9^th, 2013 at 12:39am:


No.  One does not need to be a scientist in order to express an opinion on science.

Now it is quite funny given that this bloke calls himself a sceptic, but, clearly due to either erroneous and poorly done research or deliberately using data to provide misleading information proactively sets back any genuine sceptic by light years.

http://theaimn.com/2013/10/03/the-facts-versus-andrew-bolt/

http://watchingthedeniers.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/herald-sun-war-on-science-no-...

http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2012/03/05/finished-bolt-should-resign/

This would be too funny if it wasn't so serious.

Apart from the actual issues being misrepresented, there is the bigger issue of integrity. Clearly it is lacking.

Now this is the problem I like to site with the entire debate. Misinformation, discredited facts, facts being falsely discredited etc etc etc.

The real problem is that we (humans) have greatly contributed to (significant) environmental degradation and this pseudo debate conducted by pseudo intellectuals (at least in MSM) does a great smoke screen job of avoiding doing anything about the actual damage we have done. That is great work really... In fact, both camps should be extremely proud of their efforts to facilitate ongoing and destructive irresponsible behaviour...

However, I will make it perfectly clear that I am quite pointedly targeting the deniers here, because, it is noteworthy that  from my perspective, deniers really do need to stop perpetuating the lie about being sceptics. I am sceptical they have that level of integrity though...

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 9^th, 2013 at 9:37am:


This tiny pecca guy evades and squirms for 24 hours because he doesn’t want to answer whether he’s a climate scientist or knows anything about climate science and then comes up with a stupid answer like this. OK here’s a little piece of logic that would occur to a preschooler but not to you.  When you say “One does not need to be a scientist in order to express an opinion on science.” That’s true.  Trouble is the opinion isn’t worth sh!t or bothering with.   

In the 2 months I have come to this site I’ve never seen you contribute anything worthwhile.  Just snide little remarks here and there but nothing ever substantial because your too gutless to stick your neck out and commit to anything. You wont even say whether you believe in climate change or not (apparently Im supposed to find the link where you say that – hehehe fat chance, for an insignificant a hole like you).  Well which is it?  Just say.  You believe in it or not?  Commit like we all have to commit and have the courage to defend your conviction against those who disagree (like we all do). And here’s a harder one for you.   Do you believe in anthropogenic global warming. What’s the bet that if and when you come back it wont be with a straight answer to either of these 2 questions.  Just a cheap gutless quib intended to put us off the scent that you don’t have the courage to stick your neck out on anything

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2013 at 10:36am:


I believe in climate change.  I have said this on many occasions, in several threads.

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2013 at 10:36am:


I am currently sceptical of the AGW theory.

However, I am completely open-minded on the subject and am willing to admit that my mind may change in the future (depending on the evidence presented).  I have said this on many occasions, in several threads.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 10^th, 2013 at 10:55am:

It is so important to highlight what you did above because it shows what a worm you are.  What a deceitful cheap trickster you are.  The full quote was " When you say “One does not need to be a scientist in order to express an opinion on science.” That’s true.  Your pathetic. And its well known about you, believe me.