Ajax wrote on Oct 10
th, 2013 at 3:50pm:
Phemanderac wrote on Oct 10
th, 2013 at 7:05am:
Now it is quite funny given that this bloke calls himself a sceptic, but, clearly due to either erroneous and poorly done research or deliberately using data to provide misleading information proactively sets back any genuine sceptic by light years.
http://theaimn.com/2013/10/03/the-facts-versus-andrew-bolt/http://watchingthedeniers.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/herald-sun-war-on-science-no-...http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2012/03/05/finished-bolt-should-resign/This would be too funny if it wasn't so serious.
Apart from the actual issues being misrepresented, there is the bigger issue of integrity. Clearly it is lacking.
Now this is the problem I like to site with the entire debate. Misinformation, discredited facts, facts being falsely discredited etc etc etc.
The real problem is that we (humans) have greatly contributed to (significant) environmental degradation and this pseudo debate conducted by pseudo intellectuals (at least in MSM) does a great smoke screen job of avoiding doing anything about the actual damage we have done. That is great work really... In fact, both camps should be extremely proud of their efforts to facilitate ongoing and destructive irresponsible behaviour...
However, I will make it perfectly clear that I am quite pointedly targeting the deniers here, because, it is noteworthy that from my perspective, deniers really do need to stop perpetuating the lie about being sceptics. I am sceptical they have that level of integrity though...
Just one question what makes you an expert on sceptics.....????
In your opinion maybe that's how you would expect a sceptic to act, but that's only your opinion.
Your entitled to it like everyone else.
I wouldn't read anything Michael Mann has to say, because in my opinion he's a lying PIG.
Climategatehttp://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climatega... I don't claim to be an expert, you attached that banner, I merely expressed my opinion. I cannot begin to articulate how pleased I am that you grant me that entitlement...
You are entitled to your opinion with or without basis too as it happens, but then you obviously knew that.... So, that knocks off yet another link provided, however, I did provide more than just one from Michael Mann, however, I already realise what you are doing....
Anyway, climategate, pfft,
http://www.decodedscience.com/the-truth-behind-the-emails-of-climategate-parts-1...Now, what ever you do, don't read this link. If, even after my warning, you do read it, please ensure you put no effort into comprehending it and what ever you do, DON'T click on any of the headings or sources they provide.....
Now, while you follow those instructions I will work on composing your next reply....