Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Send Topic Print
Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change (Read 19008 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137937
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #60 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 9:11pm
 
Emma wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 9:09pm:
Ajax wrote on Sep 30th, 2013 at 9:33am:
Sea levels have been rising since around the 1800's when we started to climb out of the mini ice age by temperature going up.

Temperatures have been rising since the 1800's.

Its only natural that temperature co2 and ocean levels rise.

The question that everyone should be asking is how much of the warming is actually due to manmade CO2
.


er wasn't it just on the News ??  yesterday..??

did you miss it..?





The keyword is "actually".


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #61 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:22pm
 
What alternative do you propose for the warming ?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25012
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #62 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:56pm
 
0.89 degree increase in temperatures over the last 100 years. No wonder people consider global warming to be crap.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #63 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 11:06pm
 
It only started to kick in around 1960 or so. Nobody is talking about the last 100 years.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #64 - Oct 1st, 2013 at 11:35pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:56pm:
0.89 degree increase in temperatures over the last 100 years. No wonder people consider global warming to be crap.



You may as well say 0.89 deg C in 1000 years

Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #65 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 6:57am
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 11:35pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:56pm:
0.89 degree increase in temperatures over the last 100 years. No wonder people consider global warming to be crap.



You may as well say 0.89 deg C in 1000 years


Given that it has been cooling for most of that time, it makes sense.

Chart from AR5. This is the global version. Some of the Northern hemisphere studies show a more pronounced Medieval warming.
Back to top
 


...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #66 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 7:13am
 
This graph shows all the Northern Hemisphere studies, including some of the ones Ajax quoted.

Some specific regions show a pronounced Medieval warming.  It's interesting to see the non cherrypicked data.
Back to top
 

graph6.jpeg (55 KB | 43 )
graph6.jpeg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #67 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 7:24am
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:56pm:
0.89 degree increase in temperatures over the last 100 years. No wonder people consider global warming to be crap.


- and yet you get people talking about the Medieval Warming when Vikings lived in Greenland and grapes were grown in Southern England because it was so warm. That was less than today's temperatures but it was regarded as significant. Well, they are making pretty good wines again in Southern England. They have been for a few years now.

...

0.89 degrees is not too bad. Wait until you see 2 degrees. At the rate at which CO2 is being pumped into the atmosphere, that's not far away.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #68 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 12:43pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 6:57am:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 11:35pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Oct 1st, 2013 at 10:56pm:
0.89 degree increase in temperatures over the last 100 years. No wonder people consider global warming to be crap.



You may as well say 0.89 deg C in 1000 years


Given that it has been cooling for most of that time, it makes sense.

Chart from AR5. This is the global version. Some of the Northern hemisphere studies show a more pronounced Medieval warming.


That kick in the temperature towards the end looks very ominous Mr muso


Gee I wonder if Mr Ajax has any ideas about what could be driving that thermal perturbation?
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #69 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 1:23pm
 
It must be the er.... recovery from the little ice age...that's it.

The Earth just kept on Warming. It was magic I tell you. 

Of course the temperature records show an apparent cooling, but never let the facts get in the ways of a sacred ideology. The Boltites have a very strong faith.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Grey
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5341
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #70 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 2:07pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 1:23pm:
It must be the er.... recovery from the little ice age...that's it.

The Earth just kept on Warming. It was magic I tell you. 

Of course the temperature records show an apparent cooling, but never let the facts get in the ways of a sacred ideology. The Boltites have a very strong faith.


Faith is a wound healed by knowledge.
Back to top
 

"It is in the shelter of each other that the people live" - Irish Proverb
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #71 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 3:00pm
 
Grey wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 2:07pm:
muso wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 1:23pm:
It must be the er.... recovery from the little ice age...that's it.

The Earth just kept on Warming. It was magic I tell you. 

Of course the temperature records show an apparent cooling, but never let the facts get in the ways of a sacred ideology. The Boltites have a very strong faith.


Faith is a wound healed by knowledge.


I have a strong personal sense of faith in the pillars of science and mathematics.

In fact in today's world the majority of priests are scientists and we have been swamped with churches that are commonly referred to as laboratories.

My only concern is the religious faith exhibited by 95% of the worlds Nobel prize winners.
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #72 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 4:18pm
 
Arctic Sea Ice projections from the AR5 WG1 Technical summary. Note - Final Draft only:

Quote:
Figure TS.17:

Northern Hemisphere sea-ice extent in September over the late 20th century and the whole 21st century for the scenarios RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5 in the CMIP5 models, and corresponding maps of multi-model results in 2081–2100 of Northern Hemisphere September sea ice extent. In the time series, the number of CMIP5
models to calculate the multi-model mean is indicated (subset in brackets). Time series are given as 5 year running
means. The projected mean sea ice extent of a subset of models that most closely reproduce the climatological mean state and 1979

2012 trend of the Arctic sea ice is given (solid lines), with the min-max range of the subset indicated with shading. Black (grey shading) is the modelled historical evolution using historical reconstructed forcings. The CMIP5 multi-model mean is indicated with dashed lines.
Back to top
 

graph8.jpeg (78 KB | 36 )
graph8.jpeg

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #73 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 4:35pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 2nd, 2013 at 4:18pm:
Arctic Sea Ice projections from the AR5 WG1 Technical summary. Note - Final Draft only:

Quote:
Figure TS.17:

Northern Hemisphere sea-ice extent in September over the late 20th century and the whole 21st century for the scenarios RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5 in the CMIP5 models, and corresponding maps of multi-model results in 2081–2100 of Northern Hemisphere September sea ice extent. In the time series, the number of CMIP5
models to calculate the multi-model mean is indicated (subset in brackets). Time series are given as 5 year running
means. The projected mean sea ice extent of a subset of models that most closely reproduce the climatological mean state and 1979

2012 trend of the Arctic sea ice is given (solid lines), with the min-max range of the subset indicated with shading. Black (grey shading) is the modelled historical evolution using historical reconstructed forcings. The CMIP5 multi-model mean is indicated with dashed lines.


Is there data available concerning the volume of Ice loss?
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Why I don’t believe in Catastrophic Climate Change
Reply #74 - Oct 2nd, 2013 at 5:03pm
 
There is. It's in the Technical Summary. You can find it using search on your pdf reader. It's actually mass in Gt, but it's close enough to assume 1 tonne = 1 cubic metre.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Send Topic Print