Australian Politics Forum - IPCC 95% sure about AGW

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 137955
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #105 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 1:06pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 1:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 12:33pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 8:12am:

I wouldn't be too hasty to judge his politics on the basis of his clouded views on global warming. In fact I think you'd be surprised. There are those who claim that I'm Left Wing and others that equate greggerypeccary with the Right. In fact you can reverse those two conclusions.

I'm an open-minded sceptic when it comes to AGW.

I see, so you are sceptical about CO2 being a by-product of fossil fuel combustion and whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas/

No.

Nice try though.

You amuse me almost as much as #

Back to top

IP Logged

Innocent bystander Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4220 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #106 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:11pm Peccary is a bit of an outcast being a lefty "denier", funny how these things seem to go along political lines, I have to suffer the same indignity in my role as being a rabid right winger and yet also the worlds biggest atheist
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 137955 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #107 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:21pm Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:11pm: Peccary is a bit of an outcast being a lefty "denier" sceptic ... And I wouldn't have it any other way. This issue isn't about partisan politics, or consensus: it's about science.
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #108 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

Innocent bystander Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4220 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #109 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:55pm muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm: Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that. Its not really a scientific topic is it?, more religious or political.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 137955
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #110 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic Gold Member Offline πολιτικός Posts: 4826 Mawson Base Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #111 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:10pm greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm: muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm: Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that. I've dealt with many alarmists. ....but never dealt with Bolt or Moncton.
Back to top	Mini Ice Age (2014-2029) Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 137955
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #112 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:12pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

....but never dealt with Bolt or Moncton.

Exactly.

Back to top

IP Logged

muso

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #113 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

Back to top

1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #114 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 1:06pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 1:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 12:33pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 8:12am:

I wouldn't be too hasty to judge his politics on the basis of his clouded views on global warming. In fact I think you'd be surprised. There are those who claim that I'm Left Wing and others that equate greggerypeccary with the Right. In fact you can reverse those two conclusions.

I'm an open-minded sceptic when it comes to AGW.

I see, so you are sceptical about CO2 being a by-product of fossil fuel combustion and whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas/

No.

Nice try though.

You amuse me almost as much as #

You accept the premise the co2 levels are rising and that humans are responsible for this rise. You accept the fact that co2 is a greenhouse gas.

So what exactly are you denying?

Do you even understand your own DENIALIST stance?

I am keen to learn from the master DENIALIST as to why he frequents his religious temples and why he worships the bolt priest and Moncton charlatan

Don't be afraid Greg, you're amongst friends here.

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Innocent bystander

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #115 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:25pm

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm:

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

The latest IPCC report is a political document not a scientific document, it has absolutely no scientific basis at all with regard to real science.
Just watch the Donna Framboise interview at the 50 to 1 project , if you still have faith in the IPCC after watching that then you may need professional help Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 137955
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #116 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:32pm

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

I never said that the IPCC Report has nothing to do with science.

However, alarmists like you and the monkey boy manage to treat it like a religious document. You latch onto one piece of evidence and then faith takes over from there. The IPCC Report becomes your bible, and you won't hear a bad word said about it. According to the closed-minded alarmists there's no way any of the scientific information in it could be wrong.

You don't seem to understand the basic principles of science, and your minds are completely closed. As I said before, I've never encountered a more closed-minded or arrogant group of people in my life.

Moreover, I've lost count of the amount of times that you and other alarmists have used the term 'consensus'. Just more evidence of your complete lack of understanding when it comes to science.

AGW is certainly a scientific theory, based on sound scientific principles, however, you alarmists manage to arrogantly turn it into nothing more than a faith based religion.

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #117 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 4:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:32pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

I never said that the IPCC Report has nothing to do with science.

However, alarmists like you and the monkey boy manage to treat it like a religious document.

Actually I don't bother too much with the IPCC reports. The IPCC reports tend to be too conservative due to their numerous inputs. Their conclusions are generally diluted and conservative.

Being a researcher myself I have access to numerous scientific data bases that have excellent search tools. I generally base my assessment of scientific theories and their supporting evidence on the peer reviewed literature and it is this approach that has led me to feeling VERY concerned about AGW, and the serious climate, environmental and ecological disasters that await humanity if Carbon releases aren't mitigated substantially.

So when you gallop in here with your Bolt sunglasses on and residual intellect it can only lead to ONE thing

Isn't that right greggy boy!

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 137955
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #118 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 5:29pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 4:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:32pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

I never said that the IPCC Report has nothing to do with science.

However, alarmists like you and the monkey boy manage to treat it like a religious document.

Being a researcher myself ...

... So when you gallop in here with your Bolt sunglasses on ...

You might want to do a bit of research on the English language.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1380325015/112#112

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #119 - Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 5:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 5:29pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 4:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:32pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 3:06pm:

muso wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2013 at 2:49pm:

Maybe you should talk about the science then. I shouldn't be so hard on Ajax. At least he tries to do that.

I've dealt with many alarmists.

What I have learned is that it's a complete waste of time discussing the science with them They simply do not wish to listen to anything that differs from their own preconceived, arrogant views.

As the previous poster said: it's more like a religion with you alarmists. In all my years, I have never encountered a more closed-minded group of people (except perhaps religious fundamentalists).

Ajax will learn soon enough.

Just skim through the latest IPCC Report and say that it's nothing to do with science while maintaining a straight face.

I never said that the IPCC Report has nothing to do with science.

However, alarmists like you and the monkey boy manage to treat it like a religious document.

Being a researcher myself ...

... So when you gallop in here with your Bolt sunglasses on ...

You might want to do a bit of research on the English language.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1380325015/112#112

So one of your major sources for research is OZPOLITIC?

interesting....

It must have taken a long time for you to arrive at your nickname?

Did you have a difficult upbringing Greggy boy?

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged