Ajax wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 1:08pm:


...but of course YOU and your lunatic right wing mentors Bolt and Moncton know and believe the CO2 level in the earths atmosphere should be ramped up unabated

because Mr Ajax rejects the high school level science that validates AGW which warns us of serious climatic and ecosystem effects going forward.

All because of a neurotic aversion to his paranoid view of the NWO and the taxation charlatans.

What do you have against taxation by the way? 96% of the worlds inventions and ideas have been initially funded and developed courtesy of the tax payer - the state. 9and of course then handed to the private and corporate sectors who proceed to de-moralise it via the profit and slave fascist doctrine.

Even the internet and the common PC was invented and developed by tax payers funding.

What are you doing in this socialist realm?

And of course ALL wars are funded by the tax payer, with the only profits going directly to the corporate and private sectors. You do know how it works Mr Ajax, don't you? Who makes the weapons in the USA and who pays for them? Who fights the wars? Who sends their children to the front line? Any congress senators sending their children to Iraq and afganastan? Any Bill Gates or Greenspans or Hollywood actors sending their kids to fight these imperial wars for profit and power?

What about Jerry Seinfeld? Or George Bush? Or YOU! Are you putting your parachute on to drop into Syria or Iran? To fight the good fight for mother and country?

they pay Australian defence personnel very well I hear when they serve overseas in conflicts - in fact not only do they give them a pay rise, but they give them a tax exemption mr Ajax

Ajax wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 2:19pm:


You want scientific evidence? lol. really? there hasn't been any evidence of you operating in the scientific realm when posting on his forum. In fact you seem to regurgitate Boltisms and Monctonisms ad nauseam who spin their deceit via the fossil fuel funded propaganda sites. hardly scientific Mr Ajax.

Wow, you have concern for Australias taxes going to the UN?

You ignore the 9 billion dollars of tax payer funded subsidies and grants that the COAL industry gets EACH in Australia - just COAL!.

Are concerned with the 1.9 trillion dollars that the Fossil fuel industry gets world wide via the tax payers? (IMF source - youre not going to dispute your beloved capitalist corporate fascist IMF are you?)

You are silent on the fact that it actually COSTS the tax payer to have a mining and energy resource sector in Australia - even during a Boom period. Why? Well these corporations hardly pay any tax and are 83% foreign owned. In addition Mr Ajax, the sector only employs about 3% of Australians, less than the tourism industry in Queensland.

And of course if the world follows your lunatic self destructive pathway, the Great Barrier Reef will surely shrink.

Smart move Mr Ajax - but of course you will most likely be gone by then - don't worry the next generations can deal with your paranoid based delusional pseudo scientific  insanity.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 2:40pm:



Actually, it's you who repeatedly brings up Messrs Bolt and Monckton.

That says an awful lot.

# wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 4:58pm:



You could, if you so desired, actually take a little time to address the excellent point I have made.

Scroll back through this, and any other AGW thread, and see who mentions Messrs Bolt and Monckton first.

My point is quite valid.  You shall see.

None of the sceptics on here pay any attention to the two aforementioned men, however, Chimp, yourself, and many other AGW alarmists seem obsessed with these gentlemen.

Perhaps it's time you spent a little less time calling people names (which is all you seem to do lately) and instead adopt an objective view on what's actually being said.

Just a friendly suggestion (people get bored with name-calling very quickly).

Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:



And that's exactly what the alarmists want to avoid: balance.

They're all for censorship, rather than listening to different points of view.

#, for example, was calling for me to be banned becasue he doesn't like me: a) asking the difficult questions; b) pointing out inconvenient truths, and; c) presenting different points of view.

# spends his entire time on this forum calling me (and others) names, yet he calls for me to be banned.

Why is that?

Just another question he'll ignore (before calling me yet another name).

His constant abuse speaks volumes.

Now, I wonder if he will address my excellent point a few posts back: i.e. the alarmists are always the first to mention Bolt, not the open-minded sceptics.

# wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 5:33pm:



Case in point.

"# spends his entire time on this forum calling me (and others) names ... "

Once again, he avoided a legitimate question and instead resorted to personal abuse.

Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 5:40pm:



I suppose I'll allow him some time to apply some ointment.

Although, I don't suspect he'll be back for more (unless, of course, he enjoys having a sore arse).

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 5:05pm:
You say excellent point, I see only unsubstantiated assertion.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 5:05pm:
Sending people on wild-goose chases is the mark of a troll. It's up to the one making the assertion to substantiate it.

Substantiation is generally archived by links and quotes. For example: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 5:56pm:
I infer that leaving only one hand free for the keyboard makes the necessary extra typing difficult for you.

The audience responds best when you show that you respect them. Your behaviour shows no respect. Deflating your ego a bit would benefit you, as well. Just until it's smaller than the planet.