# wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 2:48pm:



Not at all.  Quite the opposite.

I suggest you read it again.

# wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 10:05am:

# wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 12:49pm:
OK, you've tacitly acknowledged that you're neither more literate, nor more numerate than the scientists. The question remains: what are your credentials, greggery?

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 2:58pm:



I have said, on many occasions, that there is an abundance of evidence out there used in support of the AGW theory.

You obviously have not been reading the posts.

My stance has not changed one bit:

- AGW is indeed a scientific theory, based on sound scientific principles.

- Moreover, there is a tonne of evidence out there that is used to support the aforementioned theory.

# wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 3:07pm:



At least the Chimp understands basic English - you, not so much.

"not enough" means there is some (in fact - quite a lot), but not a sufficient quantity.

I have never said there is "no evidence".  I have always said there is "not enough" credible, reliable evidence.

Your failure to understand the difference is alarming, but not at all surprising.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 3:11pm:

Supported by would imply enough support. You have had a lot of experience in this trolling game, haven't you? # wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 4:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 3:04pm:


Human activities such as fossil fuel combustion and de-forestation have increased the level of CO2 in the earths atmosphere. CO2 is a potent greenhouse gas. The earth warms as a result. So Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fact of nature.

You can present arguments and evidence as to HOW MUCH the earth is warming as a result, or what the consequences will be in the future to the earths climate, ice cover, sea levels etc, but AGW is undeniably a fact.

You need to change your tact, or make your comments a little clearly. You seem to be in the school of deniers that is not even accepting the reality that the earth has warmed due to Human activity drivers.

And to be one of them, you need to have an enormous amount of evidence, In fact basic theoretical science is against you.

Maybe you can develop your own scientific theory - good luck Greggy!

Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 3:20pm:




A "potent greenhouse gas" LOL , I guess you are referring to its terrible effect on global warming hysterics like yourself because there is no other study that shows co2 is a "potent greenhouse gas", in fact its really benign, the only destructive effect rising co2 levels seems to have had so far is an increase in the amount of kooky climate nutjobs prancing around in the streets with "The End Is Nigh" sandwhich boards   

skippy. wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 9:53am:



And I thought you were referring to yourself.....ya know being a DOLT........