Australian Politics Forum - IPCC 95% sure about AGW

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #285 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:52pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 7:31pm:

# wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 7:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 7:03pm:

... Don't you believe what you've seen or you've heard.

You've proven quite conclusively that you can't be believed.

Just out of curiousity ... example?

Link to one instance where you've given cause to suppose that you believe what you said.

Back to top

IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #286 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:57pm

# wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:27pm:

...How ignorant can one be before the opinion is not worth considering?

Don't you risk substantiating Dunning & Kruger; that the incompetent can be so ignorant that they are incapable of recognising their own incompetence?

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2013 at 7:03pm:

...
2. Ego, is not a dirty word. ...

The issue is not with ego; it's the inflated part that exposes mental health issues.

Inflated ego is characteristic of sociopathy. You're consistent, I'll say that for you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:37pm:

# wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:27pm:

How ignorant can one be before the opinion is not worth considering?

As ignorant as Chimp_Logic, certainly.
...

For validating most of my post and tacitly agreeing with the rest, I thank you.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139602
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #287 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 2:05pm

# wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 1:57pm:

For validating most of my post and tacitly agreeing with the rest, I thank you.

"A high need for validation originates in childhood, when a child does not get enough attention or does not feel valued. The child then grows up seeking that attention as an adult. People with a high need for validation pay an enormous social price. For example, do you experience any of the following:

=> People tend to shy away and think you are self-centered.

=> People tend to feel uncomfortable around you without knowing exactly why.

=> You attract others who have the same need.

=> You tend to feel needy.

"To confirm whether you do indeed have a high need for validation, see how many of the following statements describe you. Do you...

=> Feel sad when you are not the center of attention?

=> Present yourself in a way that calls attention to you immediately?

=> Make sure that you are the main topic of conversation?

"Unfortunately, your own need for validation can never be adequately satisfied by anyone but you. To completely meet your need for validation, you must first validate yourself and then ask others to do the same."

http://www.ivillage.com/forums/love-sex/relationship-problems/eas/affair-healing...

Back to top

IP Logged

Innocent bystander Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4220 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #288 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 2:19pm We need to stop bickering and focus on the one thing we can all agree on and that is the fact that science has been hijacked for political purposes by a bunch of sandwhich board wearing f#ckin numpties that think the end of the world is nigh Chimp logic ...
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #289 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 4:01pm I go fishing for 4 days and this is what happens.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #290 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 4:32pm muso wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 4:01pm: I go fishing for 4 days and this is what happens. So that's what did it.
Back to top	IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #291 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 4:34pm greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 2:05pm: ... => Feel sad when you are not the center of attention? => Present yourself in a way that calls attention to you immediately? => Make sure that you are the main topic of conversation? ... Sounds like you, greggery.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 139602 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #292 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 5:39pm muso wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 4:01pm: I go fishing for 4 days and this is what happens. Catch anything?
Back to top	IP Logged

muso Gold Member Offline Posts: 13151 Gladstone, Queensland Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #293 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 6:12pm Just whiting. I have to catch a big barramundi by the end of the month though.
Back to top	1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139602
Gender: male

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #294 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 6:12pm

Innocent bystander wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 9:36am:

And heres the scientific method they used to come to that 95% conclusion ...

"IPCC 95% sure about AGW"

Only 95%?

Perhaps they should speak to Chimp_Logic:

" ... Anthropogenic Global Warming is a fact of nature."

" ... AGW is undeniably a fact."

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1380325015/235#235

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 139602 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #295 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 6:15pm muso wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 6:12pm: Just whiting. I have to catch a big barramundi by the end of the month though. Whiting. Nice. I used to catch sand whiting down on Ocean Beach in Denmark, WA. Sure, they're not that big but they sure do taste nice.
Back to top	IP Logged

#

Gold Member

Offline

A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603

Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW
Reply #296 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 6:12pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Sep 28^th, 2013 at 9:36am:

And heres the scientific method they used to come to that 95% conclusion ...

"IPCC 95% sure about AGW"

Only 95%?
...

Now greggery, you know better than that: muso wrote on Oct 5^th, 2013 at 6:46am:

...
By the way, nobody has mentioned this as yet, but the title of this thread is a bit of a strawman in itself. Apart from the fact that 95% is a pretty high level of confidence, the actual level of confidence stated is 95 - 100 %.

Quote:

(extremely likely: 95–100%

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 139602 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #297 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:30pm # wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:26pm: Now greggery, you know better than that: Yes, thanks to the Chimp I know that AGW is actually no longer a scientific theory. It is a "fact". An "undeniable fact", in fact.
Back to top	IP Logged

# Gold Member Offline A fool is certain: an ignorant fool, absolutely so Posts: 2603	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #298 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:37pm greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:30pm: # wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:26pm: Now greggery, you know better than that: Yes, thanks to the Chimp I know that AGW is actually no longer a scientific theory. ... At 95%+ certainty.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 139602 Gender:	Re: IPCC 95% sure about AGW Reply #299 - Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:38pm # wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:37pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:30pm: # wrote on Oct 7^th, 2013 at 7:26pm: Now greggery, you know better than that: Yes, thanks to the Chimp I know that AGW is actually no longer a scientific theory. ... At 95%+ certainty. Nope. An "undeniable fact". Keep up, please.
Back to top	IP Logged