Phemanderac wrote on Oct 15
th, 2013 at 7:33am:
Irony much?
OMG "warmists" are conspiracy theorists too, so the "deniers" obviously are not conspiracy theorists too...
Every single argument presented about the "type" of people and the kind of actions that warmists take can be applied tenfold to the denier camp. Who would have thunk it.
Ironic that neither side recognises this simple feature of the paltry argument.
Yet we still have a pollution issue largely ignored. Now, one has to wonder (and only one it would seem) who stands to gain the most from this ongoing debate (regardless of the now irrelevant outcome)... That would be the area of genuine concern. Whoever gains or profits from this ongoing debate is the real evil in this sorry saga.
Continue on with your graphs, misinformation, predictions, counter arguments and half truths the lot of you. In the end polluters are the winners from all of your dithering.
Phemanderac like I keep telling you carbon pricing will not stop corporation from dumping chemicals in our creeks, rivers, estuaries, oceans and land.
You keep saying to clean up pollution, you wrap pollution in with carbon pricing.
Carbon pricing will only attempt to clean up manmade CO2 and nothing else.
If you are so concerned about pollution why aren't you talking about it.
For example the Spanish company that wants to dump its nuclear waste in central Australia, this deal is on the verge of being signed off and yet we haven't heard anything about it.......??????