Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation (Read 8693 times)
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #75 - Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:08pm
 
Ajax wrote on Oct 21st, 2013 at 12:59pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 21st, 2013 at 12:33pm:
where are the cooling models?

cant you find any BS pseudo religious science to derive a crack pot cooling model?

keep trying mr ajax

you have until the end of 2019

*crickets*


I think you have lost it my friend.................!!!!

I don't wont to be a bully, so I will let your crazy remarks evaporate into thin air..... Cheesy Grin Cool Tongue


so the only models in the scientific peer reviewed literature predict warming of the planet as CO2 levels rise???

Gee Mr Ajax, I wonder why that is the case?

Keep looking for your delusional science that predicts cooling and static temperature

end of 2019 remember

*crickets*
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #76 - Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:25pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:08pm:
so the only models in the scientific peer reviewed literature predict warming of the planet as CO2 levels rise???

Gee Mr Ajax, I wonder why that is the case?

Keep looking for your delusional science that predicts cooling and static temperature

end of 2019 remember

*crickets*


About your models..........!!!!

Yes we were told unequivocal warming with a 0.2 degree increase per decade from your beloved computer circulation models.

Too bad its only been warming 0.05 degree per decade for the last 15 years or so.

Now what have you to say about that...............?????


I told you no such model exists as far as I know.

But what I do know is more than one third of all manmade CO2 has been released into the atmosphere since 1998 and temperatures are flat lining.

Now what have you to say about this................????????
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #77 - Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:41pm
 
Mr Ajax has been given a simple task and adequate time to tackle a simple request.

Were are the models that predict cooling or static temperatures as CO2 levels rise?

Describe the theory and scientific assumptions that underpin these models.

cite the peer reviewed literature that has published these models

plenty of time - end of 2019

*crickets*
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #78 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:37pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:41pm:
Mr Ajax has been given a simple task and adequate time to tackle a simple request.

Were are the models that predict cooling or static temperatures as CO2 levels rise?

Describe the theory and scientific assumptions that underpin these models.

cite the peer reviewed literature that has published these models

plenty of time - end of 2019

*crickets*


I've already told you banana breath.

Now about your models..........!!!!

Yes we were told unequivocal warming with a 0.2 degree increase per decade from your beloved computer circulation models.

Too bad its only been warming 0.05 degree per decade for the last 15 years or so.

Now what have you to say about that...............?????


I told you no such model exists as far as I know.

But what I do know is more than one third of all manmade CO2 has been released into the atmosphere since 1998 and temperatures are flat lining.

Now what have you to say about this................????????
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #79 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:39pm
 
Ajax wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:37pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 21st, 2013 at 1:41pm:
Mr Ajax has been given a simple task and adequate time to tackle a simple request.

Were are the models that predict cooling or static temperatures as CO2 levels rise?

Describe the theory and scientific assumptions that underpin these models.

cite the peer reviewed literature that has published these models

plenty of time - end of 2019

*crickets*


I've already told you banana breath.

Now about your models..........!!!!

Yes we were told unequivocal warming with a 0.2 degree increase per decade from your beloved computer circulation models.

Too bad its only been warming 0.05 degree per decade for the last 15 years or so.

Now what have you to say about that...............?????


I told you no such model exists as far as I know.

But what I do know is more than one third of all manmade CO2 has been released into the atmosphere since 1998 and temperatures are flat lining.

Now what have you to say about this................????????


put an effort in Mr Ajax freak

you have plenty of time

*crickets crickets crickets*
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #80 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:43pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:39pm:
put an effort in Mr Ajax freak

you have plenty of time

*crickets crickets crickets*


Answer my questions or your just blowing hot methane.
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #81 - Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:45pm
 
Ajax wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:43pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:39pm:
put an effort in Mr Ajax freak

you have plenty of time

*crickets crickets crickets*


Answer my questions or your just blowing hot methane.


You have your assignment to complete

diverting attention away from yoru responsibility to show some integrity and credibility in here is very embarrassing for you publically
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #82 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 7:41am
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:45pm:
Ajax wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:43pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 22nd, 2013 at 5:39pm:
put an effort in Mr Ajax freak

you have plenty of time

*crickets crickets crickets*


Answer my questions or your just blowing hot methane.


You have your assignment to complete

diverting attention away from yoru responsibility to show some integrity and credibility in here is very embarrassing for you publically


Still monkeying around Rabi......!!!!!
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #83 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am
 
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed. Is it really worth arguing against the true faithful who can just about master basic arithmetic but have absolutely no grasp of basic atmospheric science?

Probably not. The best we can do is point out the  inconsistencies in their arguments. Of course, they will not understand themselves, but those reading just might.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #84 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 11:59am
 
muso wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am:
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed. Is it really worth arguing against the true faithful who can just about master basic arithmetic but have absolutely no grasp of basic atmospheric science?

Probably not. The best we can do is point out the  inconsistencies in their arguments. Of course, they will not understand themselves, but those reading just might.


surely it cant be true that you masquerade in here as an AGW denier fermenting pseudo debate?

I would be very disappointed if it was true muso
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:23pm by Chimp_Logic »  

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #85 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:00pm
 
What? The true faithful are the AGW deniers.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
Innocent bystander
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4220
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #86 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:19pm
 
muso wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am:
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed.




Lots has changed, haven't you heard?, the Australian electoral system is causing bushfires to break out all over Australia   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #87 - Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:26pm
 
Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:19pm:
muso wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am:
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed.




Lots has changed, haven't you heard?, the Australian electoral system is causing bushfires to break out all over Australia   Grin


your crack pot fascist corporate religious priests are recommending an uncontrolled massive increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration so that the earth can be cooled

These are deranged lunatics that you worship

And we all know what that makes you, don't we you smelly freak
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
#
Gold Member
*****
Offline


A fool is certain: an
ignorant fool, absolutely
so

Posts: 2603
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #88 - Oct 25th, 2013 at 9:29am
 
muso wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am:
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed. Is it really worth arguing against the true faithful who can just about master basic arithmetic but have absolutely no grasp of basic atmospheric science?

Probably not. The best we can do is point out the  inconsistencies in their arguments. Of course, they will not understand themselves, but those reading just might.

It's been said many times:
A fool is certain; an ignorant fool, absolutely so.
The more a wise man learns, the more he comes to appreciate how much he doesn't know.
The more I learn, the more I realise how little I know.
It isn't what we don't know that gives us trouble, it's what we know that ain't so.

The first, I saw on a railway cutting in Sydney, some time in the 1970s, the second is Confucian and the last is from Will Rogers. The source of the penultimate escapes me.

Committed denialists, who often misrepresent themselves as sceptics, are by and large lost causes. Innocent bystanders (by which I don't mean the rabid right-winger who uses that handle in this forum) need protection from them. The best we can offer is truth.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 139603
Gender: male
Re: AGW contrarians owe us a (scientific) explanation
Reply #89 - Oct 25th, 2013 at 9:36am
 
Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 12:19pm:
muso wrote on Oct 23rd, 2013 at 8:14am:
Well I'm back, but I see nothing has changed.




Lots has changed, haven't you heard?, the Australian electoral system is causing bushfires to break out all over Australia   Grin



An "undeniable fact of nature", apparently.

The "brain" washing continues.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print