"Letters editors rarely make the news. This month the Los Angeles Times letters editor, Paul Thornton, did just that with a story on letters from climate-change deniers. He said he would not print letters that asserted "there is no sign humans have caused climate change" because "it was not stating an opinion, it's asserting a factual inaccuracy". This attracted headlines declaring "Los Angeles Times riles climate-change sceptics by banning letters". Unsurprisingly, we've been asked how we treat letters from climate change deniers."

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/smh-letters/climate-change-a-note-from-our-letters...

Funny? Yeah.

Although, I find the actions of The Climate Cult quite disgusting to tell the truth.

I heard Peter Fitzsimons on the radio this morning, refusing to enter into any debate about the validity of AGW.  "Nothing to debate", he reckons.

Their arrogance is astounding.

Innocent bystander wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2013 at 10:23am:


funny if we weren't funding them. 30 years and countless billions spent for what? fat bureaucrats pumping out baseless propaganda.