Ajax wrote on Oct 31
st, 2013 at 8:05pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Oct 31
st, 2013 at 8:02pm:
muso wrote on Oct 31
st, 2013 at 7:57pm:
I would prefer that NO sector gets subsidies and tax breaks (the fossil fuel and nuclear sector corporate board rooms tremble in fear when they hear this)
So firstly you level the playing field. Then you regulate the banking and financial sectors so that they don't CORRUPTLY favour money lending to specific sectors (which is the case at the moment)
In that scenario, even the inefficient corpocracy and corrupt stock markets cant stop renewables from flourishing globally
Come on chimp
If they can manipulate our banking system, if they can manipulate our fossil fuels.....!!!!
What's going to stop them manipulating renewable energy..!!
I hear where you're coming from but is it wishful thinking..??
I prefer an anarchistic leaning world.
A world without RULERS - and with rules that are democratically arrived at by direct participation by ALL citizens. No lobby groups, No vested interests, No Kings, No slaves, No smacking RULERS
In that scenario - the problems of the world will still be with us, but the burden wouldn't be dumped upon specific slave classes.
Its sounds like some sort of nirvana, idealist dream world
,,,,but its just common sense - survival