Lord Monckton tells the truth about climate change and its impact on humanity.

Worth a view from believers and unbelievers alike, to understand the impacts of the nazi environmental program that has swept the world and world governance by these pigs.

Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking in St. Paul

# wrote on Oct 31^st, 2013 at 11:00am:


Ohh.....and which part of that video is light hearted entertainment for you.

1. The part about the third world....???

2. The pseudo science and dishonesty of the IPCC.

3. The amount of times the IPCC corrected their bullsh!t science after Monckton complained.....and even the times where they just shifted that part to another section in the hope that it would be overlooked.

4. Global governance of all peoples...???

Please tell......????

OK, firstly my apologies Ajax I have not watched the film right through because of some time constraints from real life at the moment. I will endeavour to get the time to watch it soon (no promises though cause home front stuff takes precedence).

Now, I did manage to get about twenty minutes spare, so watched about the first ten or fifteen.

I would make a couple of points about some things that stood out to me though.

The insignificant and unimportant (overall) firstly, whilst the "spade a spade" comment was a pretty funny joke, that is basically all it amounted to. It is not actually all that relevant to the overall debate, nor is it demonstrable or based particularly in fact - it was at best an opinion turned into a witty bit of opening banter. However, it does kind of set the stage as it were for the direction to come, i.e IPCC = evil and misleading. Whilst they may not be all knowing and correct at every turn, the same can be said for the other side of the argument.

The comments about pollution and squalor being worse in "poorer" non western countries was also not entirely honest, or, at least a thorough and clear analysis of the real situation. Most of the wealthier western countries have large corporate interests operating in those poor countries where the squalor is appalling (or words that effect) according to Mr Monckton. In point of fact, we do have some significant input into the pollution in those places and, as such, do continue to make profits from rampant polluting.

Then we have the quoted bit about Genisis from the Bible. Mr Monckton says that Chapt 1 Vs 22 mentions something about us being the Stewards of the Planet and goes on about our responsibility to look after it from the Christian Bible. Let me post for you Chapt 1 Vs 22 firstly,

"22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth."

Now, I am no theological expert at all, but, I have not managed to find a direct reference to man being a steward of the earth and all its creatures etc. I am sure someone well versed may find it. The important point though, is that already in the opening minutes Mr Monckton has chosen to quote from the bible, in support of his speech, and (to my mind at least) I have demonstrated that, what he quoted was wrong and may not even exist in Christian text and, therefore, a bit of (if not a blatant one) disregard for facts.

As I said, I will endeavour to listen/watch the whole thing when I can (an hour and a half), but, forgive my skeptisism in advance that, with a cursory check already, I am concerned that the only way to respond to this now would be to watch it, then go through every single point with a fine tooth comb to demonstrate either its voracity or it deceptiveness.

I will be perfectly honest, I am probably not prepared to do that much work on one speech of one bloke who, in my opinion, has not been 100% clear, honest and up front about the information that he delivers. Yep, I know right, I have horribly pre judged the bloke without watching the whole thing, what a terrible person I am. Of course, Mr Monckton is not unfamiliar with public speaking so, in my defence (I know I am defending the indefensible really...) I have seen and heard him speak before. I have also seen/read reviews of some of his "questionable" statements, comments, positions etc. Bottom line, I think he is about as reliable as you think IPCC is. That is my opinion though.

Of course, I realise too that I have only picked up some stuff from his opening comments and we haven't even reached the AGW information yet - however, given what I have picked up, I hope that you can understand my scepticism here....

.