Australian Politics Forum - Labor ahead 52/48 tpp

woody2014

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male

Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp
Reply #165 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 8:20am

Personal support for Prime Minister Tony Abbott has fallen, according to a new poll out today.

The latest Newspoll survey, published in News Limited newspapers, shows support for Mr Abbott has fallen from 46 per cent to 44 per cent, while Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has enjoyed a 3 per cent rise to 33 per cent.

Labor's primary vote has also improved, rising from 32 per cent to 35 per cent, while the Coalition's support fell from 45 per cent to 43 per cent.

The Coalition continues to lead Labor on a two-party preferred basis, 52 per cent to 48 per cent.

According to the poll, Mr Abbott has gone from 47 per cent to 44 per cent as preferred prime minister, while Mr Shorten has gone from 28 per cent to 33 per cent.

The poll was conducted at the weekend and comes on the back of .

It has a 3 per cent margin of error.
Wink

Back to top

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH

IP Logged

woody2014

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male

Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp
Reply #166 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 8:21am

Personal support for Prime Minister Tony Abbott has fallen, according to a new poll out today.

The latest Newspoll survey, published in News Limited newspapers, shows support for Mr Abbott has fallen from 46 per cent to 44 per cent, while Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has enjoyed a 3 per cent rise to 33 per cent.

Labor's primary vote has also improved, rising from 32 per cent to 35 per cent, while the Coalition's support fell from 45 per cent to 43 per cent.

The Coalition continues to lead Labor on a two-party preferred basis, 52 per cent to 48 per cent.

According to the poll, Mr Abbott has gone from 47 per cent to 44 per cent as preferred prime minister, while Mr Shorten has gone from 28 per cent to 33 per cent.

The poll was conducted at the weekend and comes on the back of .

It has a 3 per cent margin of error.
Wink

Back to top

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH

IP Logged

woody2014

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2044
NTH EAST VIC
Gender: male

Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp
Reply #167 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 8:22am

St George of the Garden wrote on Nov 26^th, 2013 at 8:05am:

Quote:

Kevin Bonham @kevinbonham
Follow
#Newspoll 52-48 to L-NP by 2010 prefs. I get 51-49 by 2013 prefs. No-one's replicating #Nielsen but L-NP lead clearly narrowed. #auspol

Quote:

GhostWhoVotes @GhostWhoVotes
Follow
#Newspoll Primary Votes: L/NP 43 (-2) ALP 35 (+3) GRN 10 (-2) #auspol

10:26 PM - 25 Nov 2013

Quote:

GhostWhoVotes @GhostWhoVotes
Follow
#Newspoll 2 Party Preferred: L/NP 52 (-1) ALP 48 (+1) #auspol

10:25 PM - 25 Nov 2013

Personal support for Prime Minister Tony Abbott has fallen, according to a new poll out today.

The latest Newspoll survey, published in News Limited newspapers, shows support for Mr Abbott has fallen from 46 per cent to 44 per cent, while Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has enjoyed a 3 per cent rise to 33 per cent.

Labor's primary vote has also improved, rising from 32 per cent to 35 per cent, while the Coalition's support fell from 45 per cent to 43 per cent.

The Coalition continues to lead Labor on a two-party preferred basis, 52 per cent to 48 per cent.

According to the poll, Mr Abbott has gone from 47 per cent to 44 per cent as preferred prime minister, while Mr Shorten has gone from 28 per cent to 33 per cent.

The poll was conducted at the weekend and comes on the back of .

It has a 3 per cent margin of error.
Wink

Back to top

THE DUMB LEFTIES ON THIS BOARD DONT KNOW IF THERE WINDING THEIR ARSE OR SCRATCHING THEIR WATCH

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139586
Gender: male

Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp
Reply #168 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 5:29pm

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 26^th, 2013 at 7:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2013 at 7:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 25^th, 2013 at 6:47pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2013 at 3:35pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 25^th, 2013 at 3:30pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2013 at 1:51pm:

Funny armchair didn't run off to the mods when he was saying Gillard was guilty of illegal conduct which was unproven.
Running to the mods about other posters saying bad bad words about tony wony the phony pony they must have pissed them self laughing as hard as we all did. As for unsubstantiated claims, you best ask Andrei how his assertions Bob Carr is gay is going. Grin

At least we know the sooky boy now. Grin

Big difference between Gillard and some dodgy financial transactions and Abbott and the unproven allegations saying he punched a wall near a woman that did not stand up in court and which no person is willing to sign a stat dec to back up.

No need for a stat dec sweet thing, another women accused him of indecent assault too, she even went to court, the Judge could not rule either way, so the judge did not find him not guilty at all. It must suck to support a man that is violent to women, have you no shame? Oh don't bother to answer that.

actually, the judge found that there was no case to answer ie there was no evidence to support even a prima facie case.

Can you back that up with ... anything?

I heard that the magistrate complained of "enormous conflict" between the prosecution and defence evidence.

Willing to look at whatever you've got though.

the case didn't go to trial. there was no evidence presented because there was nothing more than a single non-credible complaint that not one single other person was willing to substantiate. and the alleged incident supposedly occurred in full view of a crowd - none of whom witnessed it.

the 'conflict' over evidence was in fact the absence of it.

"Outside the court Mr Abbott said the woman's evidence was "politically motivated". He threatened to consider action for malicious prosecution."

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/17/1089694611809.html

Back to top

IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp Reply #169 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 5:39pm http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/17/1089694611809.html Phony Tony must be the creepiest Aussie since Dolly Dunn plied his wares
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139586 Gender:	Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp Reply #170 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 6:09pm adelcrow wrote on Nov 26^th, 2013 at 5:39pm: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/07/17/1089694611809.html Phony Tony must be the creepiest Aussie since Dolly Dunn plied his wares Indeed.
Back to top	IP Logged

adelcrow Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20133 everywhere Gender:	Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp Reply #171 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 6:20pm Polls are also showing that although the public want Gillards carbon tax scrapped that they dont want Abbotts dimwitted direct action...they in fact want Shortys ETS.
Back to top	Go the Bunnies IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp Reply #172 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 6:39pm I don't... Why don't they allow the repeal of the carbon tax? After all they were going to do that themselves. They just want to stuff everyone around for political reasons. Poll lead didn't last long did it... said as much yesterday...
Back to top	IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Labor ahead 52/48 tpp
Reply #173 - Nov 26^th, 2013 at 8:44pm

Grendel wrote on Nov 26^th, 2013 at 6:39pm:

Why don't they allow the repeal of the carbon tax?

Because Abbott won't replace it with a better policy. The command-economy "Direct Action Plan" is not a better policy.

Quote:

Poll lead didn't last long did it...

It's only a single poll. We cannot draw firm conclusions from single polls.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged