Aussie wrote on Dec 6
th, 2013 at 7:54pm:
Quote:without prejudice..
hey gizmo do you want aussie to take you to the court of FD???>..strewth. he will be far too busy at this rate.
aussie would it by okay if I start all my posts with W.P. you being the resident legal eagle.. I am hoping you will understand its a chore you see but if I am going to be stalked,.. I need to be on guard and being a legal you understand that dont you??>. of course you do.
Awwwwhh, come one cods. Turn it up. I'm just a bush lawyer! You said so, and it must be true. I know my place especially when gurus like you put me where I belong, in my place.
Though, you might need to have a closer look at exactly what 'without prejudice' means. I'm taking a wild guess again and I reckon it does not mean that you can start off with '
Without Prejudice,' in a public environment, and post pure crap of whatever kind comes to mind. I'm sure you'll set me right on that., dear.....if I am wrong.
what crap... what crap do I post more than others.. lets say adelcrow or you lefty mate skippypoo..
I think my post are relevant I do agree yopu dont like the trust..
just show me the LIES I POST..
yes it should always have ALLEGED in front. but for gods sake..its a forum we are not accusing..and I am usually saying what is in the media...he is charged with these small details.. brothels.atms.personal flights.. its in the charges,..,I am not making it up.
like you did
cods wrote on Dec 6
th, 2013 at 7:21pm:
cods, there is recorded litigation which goes to confirm that Abbott violently attacked a woman who had defeated him in a student election. Where is your support for her
that litigation was a defamation case that did not involve abbott...
I am only hitting back you understand you started this not me...
I prefer to discuss something with personals if at all possible.. but for me I am a sittin g duck.. so they only weapon I have is you throw mud so will I.. but I will tell you I dont like doing that..thats why I avoid people because they bring the worst out in me... and its not what I come on here for..
I prefer to agree to disagree..its more my nature.
I admit I am a bit of a knowall.and I admit I make mistake..am I the only one????
you accuse me of talking crap..so why bother reading what I say if its crap?"
did I read drah????? not bloody likely..but others did..I can name a few others I dont read either...but why do that.. its a forum..
so be my guest aussie dont read my posts..its n ot rocket science..
show me where I have posted PURE CRAP ON THOMO...something that is completely NOT TRUE..
have I called him a WOMEN BASHER??? for instance
or maybe a VIOLENT WOMEN BASHER???
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39cad/39cade3d2eb3870ad7225052dc8f3e40f6d33996" alt="Roll Eyes Roll Eyes"
I am no more a fly on the wall than anyone else so do not have first hand info... I am going by what is in the media..who are very open to litigation should they print falsehoods..
so all w e can do is believe 99% is correct and if its in most papers then it must be so..
if the ABC says LIES ALL LIES about THOMO lets us kn ow at least we will have odds on betting wouldnt we?