Sparky wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 8:59pm:


I'm white, I'm allowed to describe myself and others of my hue as such. I'm very disappointed in my fellow white people though, watching you stumbling and fumbling along. I just hope I live long enough to see your utter demise under some brutal totalitarian regime. Many like myself have been warning you for decades about it, but were consigned to the unpopular fringe. I just want to see you all reap what you have sown so I can say I told you so before blowing my brains out or jumping off a bridge.

Oh dear, did I hear you say something about blues eyes being exclusive to one racial group?  Quote:

Mathew wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 9:11pm:
You wanted to know why Asian people have slanting eyes and I showed that not only asians have slanting eyes. This proves my statement that genetic characterisitics are not exclkusive to any one racial group. What don't you understand?

ian wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 9:14pm:


But nobody claimed that genetic traits were exclusive to any particular racial group. This is not what defines a racial group. The rate at which these physical characteristics are prevalent within the racial groups is what defines broad geographic racial groups. After all, they have evolved to their environment over 40,000 years. Asiatic And European peoples even have admixture with the neanderthal, a different homo-sapien subspecies. Do you want links to this small "trivial" finding? hahaha Because that factor is hugely significant.

Nobody would say that people of Asian appearance from Asia are not distinguishable from Europeans, because some Sami mixed Scandinavians have epicanthic folds would you? haha, of course not, so arguing against race by claiming there is no exclusivity is a poor diversion.
Also the level of Epicanthic fold is not mentioned, so it could be even less defined even within the small minority of people.


[b]"Additionally, European ethnic groups that tend to have epicanthus relatively frequently are Scandinavians, Samis,[7] Poles, Germans, the Irish and British.[citation needed] They are
most prominent in women and children and tend to become less distinct with age."



[/b]
I mean how many Irish, Scottish or Germans do you know who have epicanthic folds? Thats such a laughably poor arguement against race that I find it hard to even continue arguing this.

Its a shame that leftists of this intellect and general logic are in control of our immigration policies. They'd be executed for ethnic cleansing and treason in any non-white nation.

I have no idea why lefties hate western secular culture, the culture that gay hating women oppressing cultures are busting to access, despite us being racist and all.

Mathew wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 9:23pm:
, yes they did. The claim was made that slant eyes and blue eyes were exclusive to particular groups. have you not been following the thread?
Quote:
Nice to see you back pedalling after your frantic googling to find that I am right.

Quote:
No one made that claim, seeing things again?
Quote:
irrelevant to my statements.


Quote:

irrelevant strawman. Your argument has been destroyed, you have presented zero evidence for the existence of different 'races". whte flag accepted.

Mathew wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 5:15pm:


Well, I can spell it properly, "re-colonisation" so therefore I can't be unaware of the concept but "colonisation" seems to have as it's basis that the "colonists" retain loyalty to their nation of origin.  There is no evidence of that in the immigrants whom settle here.   They take out Australian citizenship.  They swear an oath/affirmation of allegiance to Australia.
Quote:


I notice you don't even attempt to refute the points I made about the social construction of the concept of race and how racists utilise it.  I suppose you can't?

Sparky wrote on Dec 19^th, 2013 at 8:27pm:


Nope.  It's an old one, renewed.  The modern conception of "race", based upon physical differences is a relatively new belief which originated only in the last two centuries as Europeans established their empires and sought some reason to justify their rule over all those "lesser races".