Stratos wrote on Jan 3
rd, 2014 at 8:36am:
I've shown you twice, and you are refusing to answer questions again.
Or do you only deal in exact wordings now?
It isn't about exact wording. It is about your creating a preposterous claim, and then falsely attributing it to me as if I had made the claim, as a result of your dysfunction.
Stratos wrote on Jan 2
nd, 2014 at 11:56pm:
OK, so lets think critically. Lets look at the evidence that wearing hats leads to Jihad, which is what you are currently claiming.
It is about this lie you told. And no, I will not allow you to distract our conversation with another subject, until I finish helping you see what you did. Since other forum members complain about your antics as well, I felt it was about time that someone took you out to the woodshed and gave you a good sound paddling.
First, would a person with sound cognitive function, and a capacity for critical thought,
believe that ANYBODY would CLAIM that ".....that wearing hats leads to Jihad....."?
To a rational person the answer would obviously be no, and thus
they would know before they lied, that it would be a bold faced lie, to declare that another person actually made that claim.
This even after you had been exposed to post after post in this forum, in which
the CLAIM that I have actually made is that Muhammad through the Quran and Hadith is responsible for the imperialistic conquest of Islamic Jihad that is binding on Muhammad's true followers, and
I supported my claims with the Quran and Hadith. My claims are further confirmed by 1400 years of Islamic history, including Muhammad's First Jihad conquering of nearly the whole of the Arabia during his lifetime, and his followers conquest of nearly the whole known world all the way up into France and Austria. My claims are also confirmed by over 22,000 deadly Islamic terror attacks around the world just since 9-11, and the fact that Sunni Muslim terrorists committed “about 70 percent” of the 12,533 terrorist murders in 2011, according to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). My claims are further confirmed straight from the mouths of a vast number, if not a majority, of Islamic Imams and Muftis all around the world today.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/jihad_islamic_terrorism.htm
Coupled with the fact that Muslims are responsible for the vast majority of the 100,000 to 180,000 Christians martyred around the world every year.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/muslim_persecution_of_christians.htm
Along with the misery of 1400 years of Islamic slavery and dhimmitude that continues unto this day.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/islamic_slavery_dhimmitude.htm
Yet after all that, you took a small part of a post and removed it from context, created a preposterous claim that was completely contrary to the context of the post,
and then lied about it being my claim. Your preposterous claim assigned to me being: ".....that wearing hats leads to Jihad, which is what you are currently claiming."
Now a rational person - even if they had not been engaged in many prior post exchanges with me as you have - even solely on the basis of that single post would conclude that I actually claim, that Saudi clerics are responsible spreading Islamic Jihad around the world, as Muhammad commanded. Simply Google - Dispatches: Undercover Mosque
You suffer the dysfunction of
denial of simple objective reality. But you even went far beyond that to lie about me.
Now let's consider the post again, but as a person with a normal cognitive function would:
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388621936/9#9
The first paragraph indicates that a majority of Muslims are in favor of Islamic sharia law as the law of the land (wherever they live).
The second paragraph regards Muslims that return from the cradle of Islam "fundamentalized",
that now GET Islam, and understand it is their duty to engage in imperialistic conquest and subjugation of others to Islam.
The third recognized that Saudis are responsible for financing the majority of Islamic centers and mosques in the U.S., and by extension, the world.
The fifth paragraph quoted: "According to Muslim estimates, up to 80 percent of mosques in the U.S. are owned, operated and led by Wahhabis."
Now back in the fourth paragraph it indicated that when Saudis eventually visit the mosques that western dupes construct for them they "fundamentalize" the congregation. The fact that the women went from 90% not wearing head coverings to 90% wearing head coverings was one outward manifestations of the rapidly fundamentalized congregation.
So, would a rational person with normal cognitive function and a capacity for critical thought conclude that
I
was making the claim
that:
1. It is Islam itself, the Quran and Hadith, Islam's Imams and Muftis and true Muslims that do as Muhammad did and commanded his people to do are responsible for Islamic Jihad, as confirmed by 1400 years of history and the murder, mayhem and misery spread around the world by Islam today?
Or that based on
the evidence I claim that:
2. "Lets look at the evidence that
wearing hats leads to Jihad, which is what you are currently claiming."
Which do you think a person with normal cognitive function, and even the most minute capacity for critical thought, would suggest that I actually claim?
Forum
Pages: 
ASIO actions against islamic security concerns (Read 36140 times)
