skippy. wrote on Jan 8
th, 2014 at 5:45pm:
cods wrote on Jan 8
th, 2014 at 5:15pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 8
th, 2014 at 4:55pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 8
th, 2014 at 4:47pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jan 7
th, 2014 at 3:38pm:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 7
th, 2014 at 3:28pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 7
th, 2014 at 2:24pm:
Happy to dish it out over the unsubstantiated allegations of Abbott assaulting a woman 30-odd years ago in his early 20's, but can't handle it when it's Gillard in the hot seat over corruption when she was supposedly a competent lawyer. Cry me a river!
You mean the assault he said he didn't do, he said they lied about, then he said perhaps he did, and then we heard how great a husband he is? That assault?
It's odd isn't it??...Tony Abbott is supposedly a 'serial groper and intimdator/woman basher', but after all the press coverage and magazine articles/books, there hasn't been ONE single other woman come forward with a similar story. Yet when someone like Bill Clinton has a consensual (yes it was infidelity) affair, other cases and accusations appear out of the wood work.
But for Abbott, only 2 women (both of whom, strangely held opposing political views to Abbott), one of them backed up by a friend from the same student politcal organisation..
That is just argumentative speculation Mr Gizmo. Fact is, there are women who allege
Abbott assaulted them ~ one sexually, and the other physically in a most violent fashion. oopppps... didntyou mean ALLEGEDLY???????defamation coming up maestro..
unless you have PROOF beyond a shadow of doubt.. which mean not one word against another...but honest to goodness PROOF>..
just because you and skippy keep repeating it doesnt mean it happened.
Yes dear, have a grade three child explain to you that allegedly comes from the word allege.
Aussie was far too kind using the word allege to begin with, I believe the women, while you on the other hand believe a male that is accused multiple times of assaulting women in all sorts of ways.
you poor boy you must have missed the saga of aussie going through all my posts to prove I should hav e and didnt use the WORD ALLEGEDLY>>.so when you know what you are talking about join in..
I do not believe you will find a post... ask aussie.
. where I have said either are innocent..I am going by the FACTS the ones that are in the OPEN>. and have been through the COURTS>.
ABBOTT has not denied this court case... he has not denied he was charged...
IT IS A FACT IT WAS THROWN OUT OF COURT AND NO CHARGES WERE MADE..
gillard on the other hand has denied a lot...she has a lot to live up too..
you see sunshine.. ITs AUSSIE that thinks he is the bush lawyer on here..
NOT ME>. but if the pot insists on calling the kettle black..
then its only fair if he makes up the rules he at least pertains to be ruled by them himself
you dont agree that allege is necessary.. tell aussie not me..hes the one that wishes to split hairs