John Smith wrote on Jan 10
th, 2014 at 10:17am:
BigOl64 wrote on Jan 10
th, 2014 at 10:03am:
woody2014 wrote on Jan 10
th, 2014 at 9:59am:
BLOODY HELL the guy was burnt BLACK HOW WOULD ONE KNOW
Because his scar is pink as old burn scars tend to be, even for black people.
If it was recent burn, it would indeed be black and scabby looking, which it wasn't.
Thanks for supporting the fact these are nothing more than lying little scumbags
that would depend on how badly burned he was, and the time lapsed between the incident and the video (something I notice you've failed to answer) .. they claim they were held against the hot engine ...
depending on how hot the engine was, and how long they were held there the scar could indeed be pink after a few days
So a minor heat burn, and major burn could look the same depending on the time frame, same as a burn inflicted by a non-navy person could be the same as a burn inflicted by a navy person; in fact it could be just one biig lie, rather than any sort of substantiated accusation.
If you look at all the accusations and you are not bigoted against those who serve in the ADF you would quickly work who the lying scumbags are; but since that is not the case, you are continuing this cretinous line of questioning.
Talk to me again when you have some decent evidence that navy personnel burned these reffos and hit them with shoes; yep that's right our navy tortures reffos by hitting them with shoes. I suggest you have a think about the veracity of that.
If you you can't reciognise a steaming pile of dogsh1t, you prolly shouldn't be here, you might hydadits.
f#ck off bigol .... this isn't an attack on your boyfriend ..
I asked a question. i have drawn no conclusions, I just questioned your reasoning (or lack off). Don't get upset just because you look like a d1ck.
Forum
Pages: 
