Stratos wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2014 at 11:03pm:


Islam is nothing but a pile of hogwash. There isn't even any proof that Mecca existed prior to the 4th century AD.
I QUOTED THE HADITH. You indicated I misrepresented it.

Stratos wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2014 at 11:03pm:

Who's the liar?

I had even left you a link, but you were so overcome by the spirit of antichrist - by the father of lies himself - that he caused you to lash out and lie about me lying, in false accusation.

Bukhari B58, #188 Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun: During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey

surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it

, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse.

I too, stoned it along with them.

Your lie exposed here isn't all that makes you a liar:

1Jo 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not

God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record

that God gave of his Son.

And simultaneously a false accuser, just as prophesied of such as yourself, in these days:

2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.    2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,    3  Without natural affection, trucebreakers,

false accusers

incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,    4  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

Stratos wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2014 at 11:42pm:


You are correct that I jumped to an unsound conclusion, since Amr bin Maimun may not have been quoting Muhammad, but rather recounting his own experience. Though my mistake doesn't make you any less of a liar according to the scriptures.

1John 5:10 He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son

What it does demonstrate is that Muhammadans continue to this day in monkey-see-monkey-do, not only in their stoning of adulterers, but even kissing the Quraish pagan's black stone idol, just as Muhammad did. They themselves will tell you that the only reason they do it is because Muhammad did.

Stratos wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2014 at 12:05am:


Are you suggesting that my mistake somehow makes you less of a liar according to the scriptures? Less of an antichrist? Less of a false accuser of Jesus Christ? Less of a follower of the father of lies? Less of a blasphemer of God and His scriptures?

Even with accusation against the Gospel writers, and even arguing against the crucifixion, just like a Muslim would:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388621936/136#136

Stratos wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2014 at 12:05am:


You were not lying on that point, to which I already admitted and repented, and I'll formerly apologize to you for my error and resulting accusation against you. However you didn't point out that it "wasn't about Muhammad", but highlighted that it was "During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance", which didn't help me see your point, since Muhammad was also around during the days before he invented his anti-religion and started his cult. There is no shortage of Islamic literature attesting to those days. Like the occultism in the family of Muhammad:
http://religionresearchinstitute.org/Mohammad/occultism.htm
And Muhammad's being so deeply involved in "Ahnaf" - which was a local sect of the 2nd century occult cult of the Sabians - that the locals often referred to Muhammad simply as "the Sabian".

However you are a chronic liar regarding the things of the Spirit of God. Accompanied by your closet Muslim styled unwavering defense of Satan's antichrist anti-religion.

Actions?

To be fair, Gandalf said actions of the majority - you cannot judge Muslims by what they think, say or do, unless the majority do it. Thus even when they stone people to death you cannot judge them for it because it is hard to get more than 50% to participate.

From the opening post:

freediver wrote on Jan 14^th, 2014 at 9:30am:


This is Gandalf refusing to judge Muslims for supporting the death penalty for apostasy and stoning adulterers to death because they have enough self control not to go round killing people. Given that most Nazis exercised the same level of personal restraint, I think the comparison is entirely reasonable.

Gandalf's first response in this thread:

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 14^th, 2014 at 11:12am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 8^th, 2014 at 8:54pm: