Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Our relationship with the Environment (Read 3133 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137136
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #15 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.






Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #16 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:23pm
 
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:04pm:



I'm not very inventive when it comes to mindless name calling... er testicles deprived of physical sensation (will that do?)


Join the club Muso. When an inarticulate poster bombards me with obscenities instead of addressing the content of my post - I draw a total blank trying to come up with something equally as unpleasant to say back to them. Some of us just haven't got it in us.  Smiley

muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin


Like Aussie - I don't understand the science and try to stay out of the GW debates, but your pictures of the extreme changes to a tree is something I can recognise in my own garden, although not to the same degree. The seasons are coming later and don't seem as intense as they used to be aside from this summer which has seemed a lot hotter than perhaps the last 5 summers, but certainly not the hottest summer we've had in the last couple of decades.

The plants are flowering later and although this is a little thing, when the bees arrived around Christmas - there were no flowers in bloom and I found dozens of dying bees.

Perhaps there was a simple explanation, but the tiny closed buds the bees were trying to pollinate were at least 6 weeks behind in development so they couldn't access the nectar. Birds are nesting later also - so I can see the changes, but perhaps this is a natural occurrence every hundred or even a thousand years.

We don't have records going back far enough to confirm this though.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38624
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #17 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm
 
...

Same scene....different Season?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137136
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #18 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #19 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:44pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.




OK laughing boy. As usual, you miss the entire point. Now you tell us about the seasons on Mars to back up your little ruse.

Do they have summers and Winters just the same as on Earth? - caused by that tilt in its axis. Are you comparing apples with apples?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.



It is obviously too confusing for you. You think that a single snapshot in one year compared to a single snapshot in another year somehow tells us something about climate.

The tree picture also shows two snapshots. It doesn't tells us anything about climate either. It wouldn't matter if it was taken on the same calendar day. The climate is not exactly the same from year to year. It wouldn't matter if the pictures were separated by 200 years. Two snapshots tell us nothing.

I don't actually expect you to understand that of course.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:54pm by muso »  

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #20 - Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:45pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



- and the Mars pictures?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137136
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #21 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:07am
 
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.




OK laughing boy. As usual, you miss the entire point. Now you tell us about the seasons on Mars to back up your little ruse.

Do they have summers and Winters just the same as on Earth? - caused by that tilt in its axis. Are you comparing apples with apples?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.



It is obviously too confusing for you. You think that a single snapshot in one year compared to a single snapshot in another year somehow tells us something about climate.

The tree picture also shows two snapshots. It doesn't tells us anything about climate either. It wouldn't matter if it was taken on the same calendar day. The climate is not exactly the same from year to year. It wouldn't matter if the pictures were separated by 200 years. Two snapshots tell us nothing.

I don't actually expect you to understand that of course.



All you had to say was "sorry greg, I know AGW is a lame theory".

Your tree picture showed you up for the fool that you are.

There's no going back now.

Better luck next time.

Cheers.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #22 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:08am
 
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:45pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



- and the Mars pictures?


Seem to be the same season, the left photo was taken July 31st 1969 and the right photo August 27th 2003 (as near as I can find out in 5 minutes anyway)
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137136
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #23 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:10am
 
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.




OK laughing boy. As usual, you miss the entire point. Now you tell us about the seasons on Mars to back up your little ruse.

Do they have summers and Winters just the same as on Earth? - caused by that tilt in its axis. Are you comparing apples with apples?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.



It is obviously too confusing for you. You think that a single snapshot in one year compared to a single snapshot in another year somehow tells us something about climate.

The tree picture also shows two snapshots. It doesn't tells us anything about climate either. It wouldn't matter if it was taken on the same calendar day. The climate is not exactly the same from year to year. It wouldn't matter if the pictures were separated by 200 years. Two snapshots tell us nothing.

I don't actually expect you to understand that of course.



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #24 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 4:19am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:10am:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.




OK laughing boy. As usual, you miss the entire point. Now you tell us about the seasons on Mars to back up your little ruse.

Do they have summers and Winters just the same as on Earth? - caused by that tilt in its axis. Are you comparing apples with apples?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.





It is obviously too confusing for you. You think that a single snapshot in one year compared to a single snapshot in another year somehow tells us something about climate.

The tree picture also shows two snapshots. It doesn't tells us anything about climate either. It wouldn't matter if it was taken on the same calendar day. The climate is not exactly the same from year to year. It wouldn't matter if the pictures were separated by 200 years. Two snapshots tell us nothing.

I don't actually expect you to understand that of course.



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.


What do you mean mr Greggy?

Please elaborate upon your sentence!
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #25 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 7:47am
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 4:19am:
What do you mean mr Greggy?

Please elaborate upon your sentence!


Ask Death_Rides_a_Horse. He's more coherent.

Chimp - This is the climate according to Greggary:

It's the sun! The sun caused it.

... but what about carbon pollution?

Well, there wouldn't be any life if it wasn't for the sun. Human beings are life. Human beings cause carbon pollution, so It's the sun!!!! (chortle)

... and the sun is .... just a hypothesis. Everything is a hypothesis. Greggory is a hypothesis.


Reductio ad Gregorium. 
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #26 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 7:54am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:08am:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:45pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



- and the Mars pictures?


Seem to be the same season, the left photo was taken July 31st 1969 and the right photo August 27th 2003 (as near as I can find out in 5 minutes anyway)


What season would that be?
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
muso
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 13151
Gladstone, Queensland
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #27 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 7:57am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:07am:
All you had to say was "sorry greg, I know AGW is a lame theory".

Your tree picture showed you up for the fool that you are.

There's no going back now.

Better luck next time.

Cheers.



The point is that you know virtually nothing about Mars.  Mars and Earth are like chalk and cheese.
Back to top
 

...
1523 people like this. The remaining 7,134,765,234 do not 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #28 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 9:52am
 
muso wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 7:54am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:08am:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:45pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



- and the Mars pictures?


Seem to be the same season, the left photo was taken July 31st 1969 and the right photo August 27th 2003 (as near as I can find out in 5 minutes anyway)


What season would that be?


Not a clue, don't know what the seasons on Mars are called or when they take place.
But given that one is July and the other August, the summer/winter excuse you used with the tree photo doesn't work on the Mars photos.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137136
Gender: male
Re: Our relationship with the Environment
Reply #29 - Jan 27th, 2014 at 10:15am
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 4:19am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 27th, 2014 at 12:10am:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 6:27pm:
muso wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 4:27pm:


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

The following picture shows a tree taken in 2003 and 2007 (right).  I guess that you'd state (in your capacity as honest greggary - an unbiased observer of course) that this proves global cooling  Grin Grin Grin

You are so funny.



Let's examine this a little closer, shall we?

I posted a picture of an entire planet, with a time lapse of 34 years.

You posted a picture of a ... tree, with a time lapse of 4 years.

Are you starting to see why AGW cult members can't be taken seriously, muso?

This is the sort of sloppy posting I'd expect from #.  I expected much better from you.

Anyway, enjoy the drinks.

You are so funny.

Cheers.




OK laughing boy. As usual, you miss the entire point. Now you tell us about the seasons on Mars to back up your little ruse.

Do they have summers and Winters just the same as on Earth? - caused by that tilt in its axis. Are you comparing apples with apples?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 9:16pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 26th, 2014 at 8:50pm:



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.

Such is life.





It is obviously too confusing for you. You think that a single snapshot in one year compared to a single snapshot in another year somehow tells us something about climate.

The tree picture also shows two snapshots. It doesn't tells us anything about climate either. It wouldn't matter if it was taken on the same calendar day. The climate is not exactly the same from year to year. It wouldn't matter if the pictures were separated by 200 years. Two snapshots tell us nothing.

I don't actually expect you to understand that of course.



Seasons.  Weather.  Climate.  Truth.  Lies.

It's all too confusing for those in the AGW cult.


What do you mean mr Greggy?

Please elaborate upon your sentence!



Case in point.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print