polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 7
th, 2014 at 10:18pm:
Pete Waldo wrote on Feb 7
th, 2014 at 7:13am:
So what kind of "(violent) defense of the new religion" do you suppose they would have been out to wage, against the Roman army that was coming to get Jesus, when Jesus considered 2 swords to be enough?
Obviously not (and by the way, Jesus was arrested by the jewish temple guards - not the Romans).
The Jews lived at the pleasure of the Romans,
under the Roman Empire (until they were slaughtered by the Romans in 70 AD and again in 132 AD). That's why they appealed to Pilate.
John 19:6 When the chief priests therefore and officers saw him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take ye him, and crucify him: for I find no fault in him. 7 The Jews answered him,
We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God.Jesus was executed for being the Son of God. Thus Muhammad's followers crucify Jesus all over again, day in and day out.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/islam_is_antichrist.htmRegarding those that came there were indeed officers of the Jews but:
KJV John 18:12 Then
the band and
the captain and officers of the Jews took Jesus, and bound him,
band Strong's G4686 - speira
1. a military cohort
the tenth part of legion
about 600 men i.e. legionaries
if auxiliaries either 500 or 1000
a maniple, or the thirtieth part of a legion
2. any band, company, or detachment, of soldiers
captain - Strong's G5506 - chiliarchos
1. a chiliarch, the commander of a thousand soldiers
2. the commander of a Roman cohort (a military tribunal)
3. any military commander
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 7
th, 2014 at 10:18pm:
Jesus was meant to be arrested, it was God's plan, so there's obviously no sense in resisting that.
That's right. It also refutes your accusation that the intent of the verses you prooftexted were toward a "(violent) defense of the new religion" of Christianity with only two swords.
So until you present further evidence to support your accusation it will remain a false one. That's why I initially referred to it simply as an accusation, hoping you would eventually see your way clear, to label it appropriately yourself.
Were the disciples sent out to spread the Gospel with swords the way Muhammad's followers were? They didn't even have money, let alone a spare coat.
Mat 10:9 Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, 10 Nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves: for the workman is worthy of his meat.
Everywhere they went they were invited to meals and lodging. However they of course weren't unarmed, or without armor:
Eph 6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the
breastplate of righteousness; 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; 16 Above all, taking the
shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and
the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:How many of Jesus' followers died in a sword fight? Did Jesus' disciples die inadvertently while in the act of murdering others, the way Muhammad's followers did during their imperialistic aggression of the First Jihad, or were the Apostles and disciples of Jesus simply murdered in cold blood purely because of what they believed, just the way Christians continue to be murdered all around the world today by Muhammadans?
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/muslim_persecution_of_christians.htm