Australian Politics Forum - Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96460	Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self. Reply #360 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:24pm You’re a drunk, Sparky, but you agree with everything I have to say on this issue.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sparky Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1338 Gender:	Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self. Reply #361 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:27pm Alright,what is it karnal?
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35065
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #362 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:32pm

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:18pm:

I agree, Aquascoot. These ABC types need media education in how to connect with the man in the street, with suburbia, and go to bathurst and sink piss with the boys. Yes, they need to go to the local bingo, or the local TAB and see how real australians think.

Unlike Piers, Bolt, Henderson, Albrechtson, Divine, etc, etc, etc.

They're in touch with the man in the street.

karnal, you have to admit. theres something wrong with the lefties.
the number of mega rich ruperts and ginas wouldn't get up to .00001 % of the population. If the libbos really are looking after these .00001% of the population as I keep hearing from the lefties then why did the other 99.9999% of the population vote Gillard/rudd out.
Why are the suburban battlers voting conservative?????
It has to be that the just don't like be lectured by whiney moral elites . It cant be that they prefer the POLICIES of the right. It has to be they just don't like those morally superior, poorly communicating leftard elites.
Admit it karnal, I'm right Wink

As you say yourself, the piss drinkers at Bathurst have nothing in common with piers and alan. Why are the leftards such poor communicators. Its unbe-f^^king-liveable.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96460	Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self. Reply #363 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:48pm Sparky wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:27pm: Alright,what is it karnal? I have no idea, but that’s not the issue here.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96460	Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self. Reply #364 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:54pm I admit it, dear. You’re right. I knew someone here was right. Australians overwhealmingly voted for MrAbbott .They must think he’s the bee’s knees. What a tall glass of water, what a he-man. Yes, Aquascoot, thank heavens the grown-ups are back.in charge.
Back to top	IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #365 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:15pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:15pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:04pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:55pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:17pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:12pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 3:57pm:

We've been discussing this for three years, but okay, I will bite. How so?

because you're extreme right?

Why? Because I am a Christian and I oppose homosexual marriage?

By the way, if you looked, you would see that I have never denied that I am right, and proudly so. Of course I am beyond centre-right, but that doesn't make me extreme-right.

Christmas is being stolen by those pesky muslims too, don't forget.

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

shows your extremism

derr

Opposing extremist Muslims, homosexual marriage and being a Christian doesn't make someone a right-wing extremist.

By the way, how do you identify? Far-left, centre-left or in between?

center-left.

And you don't just oppose extremist muslims, you oppose all who aren't christian. Extreme right.

I assumed that you'd say that. I think that you're more than centre-left. You are the reverse of me, in between centre-left and far-left.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #366 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:16pm

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:49pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:23pm:

Quote:

How do you know this? I've only ever heard the Gloria song at the very start and end of his show.

There you go, you see. Alan's entire show avoids bias - unlike the ridiculous so-called "our" ABC.

I don't know what you're on about, but I'd be interested to know what your thoughts were of the way that Gillard spoke to that lady in a Brisbane shopping centre?

I think JuLiar’s body language was passive-aggressive.

However, if you read a transcript of the interraction, I think it would make sense.

The woman was hostile. I don’t know the best way to handle hostile voters. I have no advice on this.

I simply manage the talent, I don’t put words in their mouths.

Regardless of whether or not the woman was hostile, Julia had no right to be rude.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #367 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:17pm

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:51pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Of course I am beyond centre-right, but that doesn't make me extreme-right

it doesn't matter what you think, it's how others see you. Cheesy

Like how myself and many others see Sale and Martin as left-wing?

Where does Leigh Sales ever offer up a view? I’ve only ever seen her ask questions.

Thoughts?

Sorry, typo. I meant Saleh.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #368 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:24pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:16pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:45am:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

Oh god.... why do I have to keep repeating myself for you... read some bloody posts will you!!!!!

The gay marriage lobby do not want a plebiscite or as they call it a referendum of the issue.

I've already stated this and explained why... go fetch for the rest. Roll Eyes

But why should we have one? Is this not a decision that can be made by our representatives?

NO!!!!!
No no no no no.....
This is a big social change, if ya didn't realise.
This IMO requires the vote of the Australian people, not a handful of wannabies and career politicians, that don't represent me but their own vested interests.

Why is it a big social change?

Howard changed it in 2004 without a plebiscite...was it a huge social change then? Grin

How did I know you'd come out with this idiocy. Not a major change?????? You are kidding or hugely demented or just plain stupid.
BTW Howard merely clarified the status quo. That which has been for millenia.

right so reclarify the status quo again. No big change. It wasn't a big thing before 2004. It's not going to be a big thing again. Simple.

Are you really that dense?
You want to change the accepted value of marriage, its nature, it's religious, traditional and societal significance, as it has been for millenia and it's no big change.

Cheesy

You are a joke.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139247
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #369 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:26pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:16pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:45am:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

Oh god.... why do I have to keep repeating myself for you... read some bloody posts will you!!!!!

The gay marriage lobby do not want a plebiscite or as they call it a referendum of the issue.

I've already stated this and explained why... go fetch for the rest. Roll Eyes

But why should we have one? Is this not a decision that can be made by our representatives?

NO!!!!!
No no no no no.....
This is a big social change, if ya didn't realise.
This IMO requires the vote of the Australian people, not a handful of wannabies and career politicians, that don't represent me but their own vested interests.

Why is it a big social change?

Howard changed it in 2004 without a plebiscite...was it a huge social change then? Grin

How did I know you'd come out with this idiocy. Not a major change?????? You are kidding or hugely demented or just plain stupid.
BTW Howard merely clarified the status quo. That which has been for millenia.

right so reclarify the status quo again. No big change. It wasn't a big thing before 2004. It's not going to be a big thing again. Simple.

Are you really that dense?
You want to change the accepted value of marriage, its nature, it's religious, traditional and societal significance, as it has been for millenia and it's no big change.

Cheesy

You are a joke.

If every single gay couple in the world became legally married overnight, how would the rest of our lives be affected?

Back to top

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #370 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:27pm

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 7:06pm:

Richard Moorcroft - leftard. Bill Peach - leftard. Molly Meldrum - leftard. All newsreaders - leftards.

The ABC’s been a hotbed of leftism for years.

Okay, Media Watch presenter, Paul Barry, just came out as a Liberal voter, but all the rest - leftards.

From his comment one can gather that at the last election he voted Liberal... just shows how badly he saw the Labor Green alliance... doesn't mean he ever voted that way before. BTW he voted for Malcolm who would fit the profile of a Labor Leader. Like I said... doesn't make him a tribal "Liberal voter"

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96460	Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self. Reply #371 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:35pm Good point, Grendel. Non-tribal Liberal voter, Paul Barry - leftard.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96460

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #372 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:39pm

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:17pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:51pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:56pm:

Of course I am beyond centre-right, but that doesn't make me extreme-right

it doesn't matter what you think, it's how others see you. Cheesy

Like how myself and many others see Sale and Martin as left-wing?

Where does Leigh Sales ever offer up a view? I’ve only ever seen her ask questions.

Thoughts?

Sorry, typo. I meant Saleh.

Yes, Matty, but she’s still a leftard, surely.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #373 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:39pm

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:16pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:29pm:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 1:24pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:45am:

Grendel wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

Oh god.... why do I have to keep repeating myself for you... read some bloody posts will you!!!!!

The gay marriage lobby do not want a plebiscite or as they call it a referendum of the issue.

I've already stated this and explained why... go fetch for the rest. Roll Eyes

But why should we have one? Is this not a decision that can be made by our representatives?

NO!!!!!
No no no no no.....
This is a big social change, if ya didn't realise.
This IMO requires the vote of the Australian people, not a handful of wannabies and career politicians, that don't represent me but their own vested interests.

Why is it a big social change?

Howard changed it in 2004 without a plebiscite...was it a huge social change then? Grin

How did I know you'd come out with this idiocy. Not a major change?????? You are kidding or hugely demented or just plain stupid.
BTW Howard merely clarified the status quo. That which has been for millenia.

right so reclarify the status quo again. No big change. It wasn't a big thing before 2004. It's not going to be a big thing again. Simple.

Are you really that dense?
You want to change the accepted value of marriage, its nature, it's religious, traditional and societal significance, as it has been for millenia and it's no big change.

Cheesy

You are a joke.

But it was fine from millennia until 2004. So why wouldn't it be fine now?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96460

Re: Q & A/ABC back to its usual biased self.
Reply #374 - Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:40pm

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 8:16pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 6:49pm:

matty wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 6^th, 2014 at 4:23pm:

Quote:

How do you know this? I've only ever heard the Gloria song at the very start and end of his show.

There you go, you see. Alan's entire show avoids bias - unlike the ridiculous so-called "our" ABC.

I don't know what you're on about, but I'd be interested to know what your thoughts were of the way that Gillard spoke to that lady in a Brisbane shopping centre?

I think JuLiar’s body language was passive-aggressive.

However, if you read a transcript of the interraction, I think it would make sense.

The woman was hostile. I don’t know the best way to handle hostile voters. I have no advice on this.

I simply manage the talent, I don’t put words in their mouths.

Regardless of whether or not the woman was hostile, Julia had no right to be rude.

Was she rude? What exactly did she say?

Back to top

IP Logged