Grendel wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 11:21am:
Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 8:30am:
Grendel wrote on Feb 12
th, 2014 at 8:30pm:
Bam wrote on Feb 12
th, 2014 at 8:01pm:
I also note that the rightards have not bothered to refute most of the items on this list. I note this tacit acceptance of this long list of broken promises.
Well I told you why I'm not going to do it. It was so stupid I couldn't even be bothered reading it all. Why would you waste time refuting idiocy and lies?
Handwaving is not a refutation.
Well I'm not waving my hand and I'm frankly sick of your inferences particularly when I'm more than courteous to you on most occasions.
If you cannot see the reasons I find them stupid not to mention biased then why would I bother?
How about the ridicule etc at the start of the article with the images? Do you honestly think this is going to be an unbiased article. Since when has this group been unbiased or even credible journalists? How about the lie "Pretty clear. No tow ropes".... talk about flippant idiocy.
This...
“Can I just scotch this idea that the Coalition’s policy is or ever has been tow-backs …
There is a world of difference between turning boats around in Australian waters and the Australian Navy towing them back to Indonesia.”Does not mean No Tow Ropes... of course as a matter of normal procedure and safety there will be TOW ROPES.
It means boats will be turned around... but won't be getting towed back to Indonesian ports.
but won't be getting towed back to Indonesian ports.One of the most interesting but incorrect interpretations of a clear statement I have ever seen.
really? next time try the whole quote.
That assessment would earn you a fail in 2nd grade of primary school.
Not me but you perhaps dna.
Had they been taking them back to port in Indonesia
how soon we forget the past.
they would have simply taken them on board there would have been no need to supply a few hundred thousand dollars of boats and a slow tow back.
What happened the last time they were on a boat that took them back to port?
None of the facts support your assessment, they all support tow backs having occurred.
It is clear what Abbott said... it is clear your bias prevents you from admitting it. Just more proof why I didn't bother to start with. To tow a boat back to Indonesia you actually have to make landfall. To tow a boat back may allow you to be withing sight of Indonesia. To tow a boat may be any distance to anywhere. Abbott clearly stated...
"There is a world of difference between turning boats around in Australian waters and the Australian Navy towing them back to Indonesia.” Sorry you failed English DNA.