Australian Politics Forum - underage marriage in Sydney

Sparky

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #30 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:27pm

True Colours wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:04pm:

If the male in this case was a 13 year-old boyfriend having sex with his 12 year-old girlfriend, hardly anybody in Australia would have cared at all.

I have been told by Christian Aussie mothers that they buy contraceptives for their 13 year-old daughters because they expect them to be acing sex at that age.

Because they are both children nobody is really to blame because they are not mature enough mentally to make a proper decision. So it's not really their fault. A grown man should know better.

Back to top

IP Logged

viewpoint

Gold Member

Offline

A joke is a very serious
thing. [Winston]

Posts: 2209
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #31 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:38pm

Doesn't matter where they're from, if they break this country's laws they should pay the penalty......prison, deportation or whatever.....

The problem here is we allow immigrants to impose their own culture on Australia. We also allow perverts born and bred here to get away with ridiculously soft sentencing which does nothing at all to deter other shytebags from committing similar offences.....

Back to top

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
- Sir Winston Churchill

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38429 Gender:	Re: underage marriage in Sydney Reply #32 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male. Chew on that.
Back to top	IP Logged

Sparky Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1338 Gender:	Re: underage marriage in Sydney Reply #33 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:51pm Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm: Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male. Chew on that. In 2014 they don't.
Back to top	IP Logged

viewpoint Gold Member Offline A joke is a very serious thing. [Winston] Posts: 2209 Gender:	Re: underage marriage in Sydney Reply #34 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:51pm Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm: Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male. Chew on that. What year are we living in? Ah yes, what country are we living in? Chew on that.
Back to top	Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Sir Winston Churchill IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38429
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #35 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:03pm

Sparky wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:23pm:

True Colours wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:07pm:

Yours truly wrote on Feb 8^th, 2014 at 8:22pm:

you are still quoting TC in your sig, thus praising him
-he supports underage sexual activities

Incorrect. I only ask that the law be based on science. Let's have a scientific definition of 'underage'.

Science - good for some thing, not good for others?

Because you keep writing 18 I assume you mean marriage. It's 16 for sex. Sex is based on scientific studies which centre on the psychological ability to make personal decisions and biological reasons. For example a female can conceive at 12 or 13 but the possibility of physical damage during childbirth is very possible. That is a few of the reasons why in our society it's illegal for grown scumbag perverts to have sex with little girls.

Soooo, what say ye about 'society' in the USA where until 1899, it was legal to marry a 12 year old female.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sparky

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #36 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:11pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:03pm:

Sparky wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:23pm:

True Colours wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:07pm:

Yours truly wrote on Feb 8^th, 2014 at 8:22pm:

you are still quoting TC in your sig, thus praising him
-he supports underage sexual activities

Incorrect. I only ask that the law be based on science. Let's have a scientific definition of 'underage'.

Science - good for some thing, not good for others?

Because you keep writing 18 I assume you mean marriage. It's 16 for sex. Sex is based on scientific studies which centre on the psychological ability to make personal decisions and biological reasons. For example a female can conceive at 12 or 13 but the possibility of physical damage during childbirth is very possible. That is a few of the reasons why in our society it's illegal for grown scumbag perverts to have sex with little girls.

Soooo, what say ye about 'society' in the USA where until 1899, it was legal to marry a 12 year old female.

I don't care. I worry about here in the year 2014.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38429
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #37 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:36pm

Sparky wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:03pm:

Sparky wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:23pm:

True Colours wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:07pm:

Yours truly wrote on Feb 8^th, 2014 at 8:22pm:

you are still quoting TC in your sig, thus praising him
-he supports underage sexual activities

Incorrect. I only ask that the law be based on science. Let's have a scientific definition of 'underage'.

Science - good for some thing, not good for others?

Because you keep writing 18 I assume you mean marriage. It's 16 for sex. Sex is based on scientific studies which centre on the psychological ability to make personal decisions and biological reasons. For example a female can conceive at 12 or 13 but the possibility of physical damage during childbirth is very possible. That is a few of the reasons why in our society it's illegal for grown scumbag perverts to have sex with little girls.

Soooo, what say ye about 'society' in the USA where until 1899, it was legal to marry a 12 year old female.

I don't care. I worry about here in the year 2014.

Yeas, we cannot be talking about a 'Christian' Country allowing dirty old men to marry kids, can we. That'd be just awful, wouldn't it.

Carry on.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38429 Gender:	Re: underage marriage in Sydney Reply #38 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:44pm Ye'd never get this sort of despicable thing happening in Christian Europe either. They'd never have allowed anything like what these dirty old musselmen get up to, would they?
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #39 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:49pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male.

Chew on that.

So that is your argument in favour of peadophilia and child rape?

We should allow peados to rape children in 2014 because the US allowed it to happen over 100 years ago.

You should be a judge, you would do well in allowing child rapists to walk free with that logic. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38429
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #40 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:53pm

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:49pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male.

Chew on that.

So that is your argument in favour of peadophilia and child rape?

We should allow peados to rape children in 2014 because the US allowed it to happen over 100 years ago.

You should be a judge, you would do well in allowing child rapists to walk free with that logic. Angry

Now, now, ~ don't you try verballing me, Rambo. I never proposed any of those concepts.

Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #41 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 3:03pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:53pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:49pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male.

Chew on that.

So that is your argument in favour of peadophilia and child rape?

We should allow peados to rape children in 2014 because the US allowed it to happen over 100 years ago.

You should be a judge, you would do well in allowing child rapists to walk free with that logic. Angry

Now, now, ~ don't you try verballing me, Rambo. I never proposed any of those concepts.

Cheesy

So this red herring you are using, about something that happend in another country over 100 years ago was not intended to divert from the situation at hand, child rapists in this country in 2014?

Because it sure looks that way.

Maybe you should start another thread so you can discuss this totally irellevant sub topic to your hearts content and strop trying to divert away from this one

Back to top

IP Logged

viewpoint Gold Member Offline A joke is a very serious thing. [Winston] Posts: 2209 Gender:	Re: underage marriage in Sydney Reply #42 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 3:08pm Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:44pm: Ye'd never get this sort of despicable thing happening in Christian Europe either. They'd never have allowed anything like what these dirty old musselmen get up to, would they? Ozzie, have you and Harriet had a barbie this afternoon........been hammering the grog have you?
Back to top	Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Sir Winston Churchill IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38429
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #43 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 3:19pm

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 3:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:53pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:49pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 1:48pm:

Until 1899, in the USA, it was legal to marry a female 12 years of age, irrespective of the age of the male.

Chew on that.

So that is your argument in favour of peadophilia and child rape?

We should allow peados to rape children in 2014 because the US allowed it to happen over 100 years ago.

You should be a judge, you would do well in allowing child rapists to walk free with that logic. Angry

Now, now, ~ don't you try verballing me, Rambo. I never proposed any of those concepts.

Cheesy

So this red herring you are using, about something that happend in another country over 100 years ago was not intended to divert from the situation at hand, child rapists in this country in 2014?

Because it sure looks that way.

Maybe you should start another thread so you can discuss this totally irellevant sub topic to your hearts content and strop trying to divert away from this one

Well, ya see.....it was Christianity which condoned this, not a 'Country,' and unless I'm mistaken, this Thread is all about the implication that Islam is a shocker because it allowed dirty old musselmen to marry kids. Did I get that right?

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #44 - Feb 9^th, 2014 at 3:26pm

Sparky wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 12:19pm:

The Vietnamese had no education and they aren't doing massive amounts of crime.

First off, Vietnamese came in as officially recognised refugees - and received all the government welfare packages that comes with that. The Lebanese got nothing - even though their situation was no less severe. Both groups were fleeing war and persecution.

Secondly, did the whole 90s decade pass you by? Before it became trendy to bag muslims, it was all about Cabramatta and Vietnamese drug gangs. We even got our first political assassination when a state MP tried to stand up against them.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged