polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 2
nd, 2014 at 4:59pm:
To put it real simply, a post-pubescent 9 year old in Muhammad's day was a lot more mature, and therefore more suitable for marriage, than a 9 year old in today's society.
There is no direct evidence that she was post-pubescent. The only evidence you trott out is that she must have been, otherwise Muhammed would be a pedophile. All the evidence we do have points to it being highly unlikely that she was post-pubescent - both the statistical evidence, and the words and actions of Muhammed himself.
How about a modern 12 year old? Do you really think they are immature compared to Muhammed's 9 year old love interest?
There is also no evidence at all that the circumstances and context surrounding Muhammed's marriage to a 6 year old girl when he was 50 is any different to this 26 year old guy marrying a 12 year old. If anything the modern example is less extreme. The age gap is far less, and the girl herself was apparently highly motivated. The father agreed to it, but did not organise it as in Muhammed's case.
You also never explained how exactly you train a little girl to be a morally appropriate child bride. Is it something to do with playing with dolls?
So, other than saying "but it's different", how does this case actually go against everything Islam teaches? Did he beat the girl? Did her force himself upon her? Did he kill her father, leaving her homeless and destitute and with no option but to prostitute herself to him?