Soren wrote on Mar 11
th, 2014 at 8:41pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 11
th, 2014 at 7:51pm:
Soren wrote on Mar 11
th, 2014 at 7:47pm:
Sooooo - show me a Muslim, imam or not, who actually condemned Mohammed's example of having sex with a 9 ear old wife.
Sooo - show me another child bride in Sydney - no, Australia.
And show me the stats on old boy paedophile priests, based on the example of their carpenter prophet.
Then we can come together and break stool, no?
Agreed.
In secular and Christian jurisdictions it is a crime. There is no possible excuse based on Christian doctrine or secular reasoning. There is no Christian or secular defence for marrying 9-13 year old girls simply because she has menstruated.
Under sharia law, on the other hand, there is a very strong religious justification for it, based on the example Mohammed set. Under sharia you could not make a law that contradicts Mohammed's example - see Saudi Arabia, Yemen, places where the Talibs are in charge.
Therefore there is no Muslim who actually condemns Mohammed's example of having sex with a 9 year old wife, as long as she has bled. This is what Gandalf himself was tapdancing around.
They will not be able to say that Mohammed's example was wrong.
Sooo - that’s your example?
Jolly good, old dear. Your posts are starting to rival Y’s in length. That’s something.
47 of the 50 Musel countries you speak of have the same age of consent laws as the Christian ones - who have almost the same underage marriage statistics as the Musel ones.
If you want to ape Yadda, go back and add a few unrelated Bible quotes.
Give us a case, old boy, or get off the pot. There are patients waiting, you know.
FD’s just hopping to let one out, aren’t you, FD?