Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 ... 70
Send Topic Print
underage marriage in Sydney (Read 115992 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #810 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:26am
 
Soren wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 5:21am:
Karnal wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 9:08pm:


47 of the 50 Musel countries you speak of have the same age of consent laws as the Christian ones - who have almost the same underage marriage statistics as the Musel ones.


Not very rigorously enforced, if at all. Very importantly, the reflex towards sharia is gaining ground everywhere  rather than the colonial inheritance of European law (which sets age limits on grounds alien to Islamic tradition and specific religious examples set by Mohammed.
This is why the 'Arab Spring' brings out the drafting of all sorts of sharia-inspired laws to replace the despised European/Western ones they see as the cause of all their troubles.


And yet, the statistics you posted show a lesser prevalence of child marriage in the three Islamic states than Christian countries like Nicuragua and Hindu India, who trumps them all.

All your evidence points to the exact opposite of your argument. You keep indulging in abstract arguments about Muhammed’s example and imams in Islamic states, but this merely reinforces that Australia is a secular state wih enforced age of consent laws.

You can’t provide more than one example of where Muslims have disobeyed these laws due to their religion. Your "over-representative" 6% census figure even shows that Muslims are going against their religion by not getting married.

The Muslim community in Australia has denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms. They don’t support it, no one can provide evidence that they do, and there is even the example of an imam turning away the father in the case we’re discussing.

And who wouldn’t? It’s a criminal offence.

You can keep going over old ground, old boy, but your arguments are only proving their opposite. Even your examples of draft laws being rejected shows that "Arab Spring" countries themselves uphold their secular age of consent/marriage laws.

You provided good proof of three Muslim countries with no minimum age for marriage, and I applauded your evidence. You would hope that a debate like this would uncover the truth rather than two competing sets of lies. If you can show me evidence of a Muslim epidemic of child marriage in Sydney, I’ll accept it.

This debate is about just that, old boy - not 1400 year old customs, not Saudi Arabia, not legal propositions by religious groups in Arab countries. It’s about Muslims in Australia marrying child brides.

So far, we have one isolated case, which is now before the court. Again, do you have anything else, or shall we now conceed that there is no problem?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:55am by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #811 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 11:49am
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:26am:
This debate is about just that, old boy - not 1400 year old customs, not Saudi Arabia, not legal propositions by religious groups in Arab countries. It’s about Muslims in Australia marrying child brides.

So far, we have one isolated case, which is now before the court. Again, do you have anything else, or shall we now conceed that there is no problem?


Keep deflecting with your spineless apologetics, mussie lover. Even if there are no examples of Australian muslims justifying child marriage on islamic grounds, the fact remains that you *STILL* can't find any muslim condemning Prophet Muhammad as a filthy pedo, and thats all that matters here: pedo loving mussies and their spineless apologists. Amrite??
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49445
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #812 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm
 
Quote:
You can’t provide more than one example of where Muslims have disobeyed these laws due to their religion. Your "over-representative" 6% census figure even shows that Muslims are going against their religion by not getting married.


I was under the impression that cases like the one in the OP would get recorded as defacto, even though they had a religious ceremony.

Quote:
The Muslim community in Australia has denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms.


Except of course, for the ones who haven't.

Quote:
They don’t support it, no one can provide evidence that they do


There are examples of Muslims who support it right here in this thread. Of course, you did your best to cover your eyes every time it happened.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #813 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
I was under the impression that cases like the one in the OP would get recorded as defacto, even though they had a religious ceremony.


It's more a legal question.  Under the law, you literally cannot be married at that age, so it is on paper, simply a de-facto relationship.  legal marriage is technically impossible.

freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
Except of course, for the ones who haven't.


What are you referring to here?

freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
There are examples of Muslims who support it right here in this thread.


I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #814 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 1:00pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
Quote:
You can’t provide more than one example of where Muslims have disobeyed these laws due to their religion. Your "over-representative" 6% census figure even shows that Muslims are going against their religion by not getting married.


I was under the impression that cases like the one in the OP would get recorded as defacto, even though they had a religious ceremony.


Why would anyone report their own relationship as "defacto" when they had a wedding?

Quote:
There are examples of Muslims who support it right here in this thread. Of course, you did your best to cover your eyes every time it happened.


Which ones? I can hardly cover my eyes if you show me, FD. Unless - you're deliberately trying to conceal them.

That's spineless apologetics right there, FD.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 12th, 2014 at 1:14pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #815 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 1:02pm
 
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:17pm:
I was under the impression that cases like the one in the OP would get recorded as defacto, even though they had a religious ceremony.


It's more a legal question.  Under the law, you literally cannot be married at that age, so it is on paper, simply a de-facto relationship.  legal marriage is technically impossible.


On paper, you're right. Census figures, however, record what people say.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #816 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 1:24pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 11:49am:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:26am:
This debate is about just that, old boy - not 1400 year old customs, not Saudi Arabia, not legal propositions by religious groups in Arab countries. It’s about Muslims in Australia marrying child brides.

So far, we have one isolated case, which is now before the court. Again, do you have anything else, or shall we now conceed that there is no problem?


Keep deflecting with your spineless apologetics, mussie lover. Even if there are no examples of Australian muslims justifying child marriage on islamic grounds, the fact remains that you *STILL* can't find any muslim condemning Prophet Muhammad as a filthy pedo, and thats all that matters here: pedo loving mussies and their spineless apologists. Amrite??


Gee, I never thought about it quite like that, G.

I thought this debate was about saving the children. Well, 6% of them, anyway.

What it's really about is Muslims refusing to become decent Christian or secular paedophiles.

Thanks for setting me straight.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #817 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:15pm
 
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.


Yes, I also remember FD taking the idea that girls can biologically bear children after the onset of menstration as being an argument in favour of Muslim paedophilia.

I blame Mother Nature.Typical.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sparky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #818 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:20pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.


Yes, I also remember FD taking the idea that girls can biologically bear children after the onset of menstration as being an argument in favour of Muslim paedophilia.

I blame Mother Nature.Typical.

Having a child too early can cause serious medical issues. I remember watching a doco once on these girls in Africa who leak urine because their urinary systems were damaged due to early pregnancies. And they were outcast because of it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #819 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 4:04pm
 
Sparky wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.


Yes, I also remember FD taking the idea that girls can biologically bear children after the onset of menstration as being an argument in favour of Muslim paedophilia.

I blame Mother Nature.Typical.

Having a child too early can cause serious medical issues. I remember watching a doco once on these girls in Africa who leak urine because their urinary systems were damaged due to early pregnancies. And they were outcast because of it.


No one's arguing in favour of children having babies here, Sparky.

Mind you, the Grand Mufti didn't specifiy child marriage being wrong for medical reasons, so maybe that's what FD is getting at.

Looks like the Muslims do support child marriage after all - on the grounds that it can cause serious medical issues.

That's the Muselman for you. He wants to cause pain and suffering wherever he goes.

Typical. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sparky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #820 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 4:47pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 4:04pm:
Sparky wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.


Yes, I also remember FD taking the idea that girls can biologically bear children after the onset of menstration as being an argument in favour of Muslim paedophilia.

I blame Mother Nature.Typical.

Having a child too early can cause serious medical issues. I remember watching a doco once on these girls in Africa who leak urine because their urinary systems were damaged due to early pregnancies. And they were outcast because of it.


No one's arguing in favour of children having babies here, Sparky.

Mind you, the Grand Mufti didn't specifiy child marriage being wrong for medical reasons, so maybe that's what FD is getting at.

Looks like the Muslims do support child marriage after all - on the grounds that it can cause serious medical issues.

That's the Muselman for you. He wants to cause pain and suffering wherever he goes.

Typical. 
So can't we talk about sections of Islam taking child brides because it offends your sensibilities Karnal. Islam should be picked on because it well and truly is a mess.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49445
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #821 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 6:41pm
 
Quote:
What are you referring to here?

TC, just as an example. I'm pretty sure he is a Muslim. Earlier in this thread he was trying to explain that science justifies sex with children.

Quote:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone


In other words, if there's grass on the wicket, it's time to play cricket. This is pretty much the standard Islamic take on it.

Quote:
but I don't remember anyone supporting it


You would spin that into something else?

Quote:
Why would anyone report their own relationship as "defacto" when they had a wedding?


OK then, how many illegal child marriages did the census pick up?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #822 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 6:49pm
 
Sparky wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 4:47pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 4:04pm:
Sparky wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:20pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 3:15pm:
Stratos wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
I remember true colours saying something about age of consent being more complex than a static age for everyone, but I don't remember anyone supporting it, and definitely no one defending the actions of the people involved in this case.


Yes, I also remember FD taking the idea that girls can biologically bear children after the onset of menstration as being an argument in favour of Muslim paedophilia.

I blame Mother Nature.Typical.

Having a child too early can cause serious medical issues. I remember watching a doco once on these girls in Africa who leak urine because their urinary systems were damaged due to early pregnancies. And they were outcast because of it.


No one's arguing in favour of children having babies here, Sparky.

Mind you, the Grand Mufti didn't specifiy child marriage being wrong for medical reasons, so maybe that's what FD is getting at.

Looks like the Muslims do support child marriage after all - on the grounds that it can cause serious medical issues.

That's the Muselman for you. He wants to cause pain and suffering wherever he goes.

Typical. 
So can't we talk about sections of Islam taking child brides because it offends your sensibilities Karnal. Islam should be picked on because it well and truly is a mess.


Islam should be picked on by telling porkie pies about Australian Muslims "taking" child brides?

You’re right, Sparky - I really shouldn’t be so sensitive. How self indulgent of me. Islam is well and truly a mess, so let’s all pretend.

I’m sure the old boy will concur. He’s a Freudian.

"Where there was ego, there shall id be."

It is a jolly world, no?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 12th, 2014 at 6:57pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #823 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 8:31pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:26am:
Soren wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 5:21am:
Karnal wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 9:08pm:


47 of the 50 Musel countries you speak of have the same age of consent laws as the Christian ones - who have almost the same underage marriage statistics as the Musel ones.


Not very rigorously enforced, if at all. Very importantly, the reflex towards sharia is gaining ground everywhere  rather than the colonial inheritance of European law (which sets age limits on grounds alien to Islamic tradition and specific religious examples set by Mohammed.
This is why the 'Arab Spring' brings out the drafting of all sorts of sharia-inspired laws to replace the despised European/Western ones they see as the cause of all their troubles.


And yet, the statistics you posted show a lesser prevalence of child marriage in the three Islamic states than Christian countries like Nicuragua and Hindu India, who trumps them all.

All your evidence points to the exact opposite of your argument. You keep indulging in abstract arguments about Muhammed’s example and imams in Islamic states, but this merely reinforces that Australia is a secular state wih enforced age of consent laws.

You can’t provide more than one example of where Muslims have disobeyed these laws due to their religion. Your "over-representative" 6% census figure even shows that Muslims are going against their religion by not getting married.

The Muslim community in Australia has denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms. They don’t support it, no one can provide evidence that they do, and there is even the example of an imam turning away the father in the case we’re discussing.

And who wouldn’t? It’s a criminal offence.

You can keep going over old ground, old boy, but your arguments are only proving their opposite. Even your examples of draft laws being rejected shows that "Arab Spring" countries themselves uphold their secular age of consent/marriage laws.

You provided good proof of three Muslim countries with no minimum age for marriage, and I applauded your evidence. You would hope that a debate like this would uncover the truth rather than two competing sets of lies. If you can show me evidence of a Muslim epidemic of child marriage in Sydney, I’ll accept it.

This debate is about just that, old boy - not 1400 year old customs, not Saudi Arabia, not legal propositions by religious groups in Arab countries. It’s about Muslims in Australia marrying child brides.

So far, we have one isolated case, which is now before the court. Again, do you have anything else, or shall we now conceed that there is no problem?



Mohammed's example must be addressed.

Muslim can 'denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms' without addressing the very basis of child marriage in Islam  - Mohammed.


This is a very typical and expected Muslim response to any question of responsibility. They will cery loudly declare that they do more to improve things but will always, always find that it's the Jews, the secularists, the other Muslims sects, the women, the splitters, etc who are actually responsible for the state they are in. There is no Muslims affliction for which a Muslim will not blame someone else. Why?

Because changing Muslim/Islamic practice, dogma, outlook is halal. If Islam changes, Islam dies. Something eternal cannot suddenly modernise itself. They know it, and so they will hang in there with the 7th century Mohammedan example of consummating a marriage with a 9 year old because if they give THAT away, what ground is there to hang on to ANY of the rest of their backward and anachronistic rules?

For Islam, change is death. That is why they resist it. Mohammed is not for revision.  This is why no Muslim will ever say that it was wrong for Mohammed to marry a 9 year old and his example should not be followed.

Islam has painted itself into an impossible corner. There is no way out from there.  This is why they react violently even to childish cartoons.







Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96634
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #824 - Mar 12th, 2014 at 8:42pm
 
Soren wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 8:31pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 9:26am:
Soren wrote on Mar 12th, 2014 at 5:21am:
Karnal wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 9:08pm:


47 of the 50 Musel countries you speak of have the same age of consent laws as the Christian ones - who have almost the same underage marriage statistics as the Musel ones.


Not very rigorously enforced, if at all. Very importantly, the reflex towards sharia is gaining ground everywhere  rather than the colonial inheritance of European law (which sets age limits on grounds alien to Islamic tradition and specific religious examples set by Mohammed.
This is why the 'Arab Spring' brings out the drafting of all sorts of sharia-inspired laws to replace the despised European/Western ones they see as the cause of all their troubles.


And yet, the statistics you posted show a lesser prevalence of child marriage in the three Islamic states than Christian countries like Nicuragua and Hindu India, who trumps them all.

All your evidence points to the exact opposite of your argument. You keep indulging in abstract arguments about Muhammed’s example and imams in Islamic states, but this merely reinforces that Australia is a secular state wih enforced age of consent laws.

You can’t provide more than one example of where Muslims have disobeyed these laws due to their religion. Your "over-representative" 6% census figure even shows that Muslims are going against their religion by not getting married.

The Muslim community in Australia has denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms. They don’t support it, no one can provide evidence that they do, and there is even the example of an imam turning away the father in the case we’re discussing.

And who wouldn’t? It’s a criminal offence.

You can keep going over old ground, old boy, but your arguments are only proving their opposite. Even your examples of draft laws being rejected shows that "Arab Spring" countries themselves uphold their secular age of consent/marriage laws.

You provided good proof of three Muslim countries with no minimum age for marriage, and I applauded your evidence. You would hope that a debate like this would uncover the truth rather than two competing sets of lies. If you can show me evidence of a Muslim epidemic of child marriage in Sydney, I’ll accept it.

This debate is about just that, old boy - not 1400 year old customs, not Saudi Arabia, not legal propositions by religious groups in Arab countries. It’s about Muslims in Australia marrying child brides.

So far, we have one isolated case, which is now before the court. Again, do you have anything else, or shall we now conceed that there is no problem?



Mohammed's example must be addressed.

Muslim can 'denounced the practice of child marriage in the strongest possible terms' without addressing the very basis of child marriage in Islam  - Mohammed.


This is a very typical and expected Muslim response to any question of responsibility. They will cery loudly declare that they do more to improve things but will always, always find that it's the Jews, the secularists, the other Muslims sects, the women, the splitters, etc who are actually responsible for the state they are in. There is no Muslims affliction for which a Muslim will not blame someone else. Why?

Because changing Muslim/Islamic practice, dogma, outlook is halal. If Islam changes, Islam dies. Something eternal cannot suddenly modernise itself. They know it, and so they will hang in there with the 7th century Mohammedan example of consummating a marriage with a 9 year old because if they give THAT away, what ground is there to hang on to ANY of the rest of their backward and anachronistic rules?

For Islam, change is death. That is why they resist it. Mohammed is not for revision.  This is why no Muslim will ever say that it was wrong for Mohammed to marry a 9 year old and his example should not be followed.

Islam has painted itself into an impossible corner. There is no way out from there.  This is why they react violently even to childish cartoons.




Why do you bother posting such platitudes in a thread on Muslim child marriage in Sydney? This is the same never-ever post you put in every thread. You might as well do a Yadda and quote yourself.

This is the last time I ask: do you have any actual evidence of more than one child marriage in Australia?

If you don’t, or if you utter more old boy motherhood statements or stage another temper tantrum, we’ll close the case.

Agreed?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 ... 70
Send Topic Print