Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 ... 70
Send Topic Print
underage marriage in Sydney (Read 116043 times)
Datalife
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #870 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:43am
 
Quote:
Muslim cleric Afroz Ali, who is an imam in Western Sydney, says the problem is a global one.

"The issue of forced marriage is not necessarily limited to the Muslim community, it seems a more cultural thing. So say for example, you may get people from within the Middle Eastern community or even I've heard from the Greek community, and say for example within the Indian community, so there seems to be cultural issues which is then justified through Islamic, in this case, or religious selective quoting to justify what they're doing. But certainly, within the Muslim community, it is not an uncommon thing."

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/02/11/focus-child-marriage-australia


Quote:
Analysis of 2011 census data reveals more than 3000 underaged teens are married or in de facto marriages across the nation.

Victorian Immigrant and Refugee Women’s Coalition executive director Melba Marginson said it was difficult to know how prevalent forced and arranged marriages were in Australia. She said her organisation saw 150 women a week and was researching this within its own network.

She said programs were needed to target specific communities, such as the Hazara community, and to train those in schools to identify forced marriages. Her organisation also helped to provide leadership courses for immigrant women.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/battered-and-too-frightened-to-say-no-a-child-brides-story/story-e6frg6nf-1226848410746#
Back to top
 

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96642
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #871 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:44am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 9:30am:
Quote:
For one thing, it is statistically insignificant


So it only counts if Muslims do it...


Ah.

I would seem to count more here, however when they don’t do it.

Always, absolutely, remember?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #872 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 11:18am
 
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:33am:
Stratos wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:23am:
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:19am:
So why the bloody hell are they following Mohammed's example in Australia in every other way?


Care to give a few examples?



What are you? A comedian?

Islam IS about following Mohammed's example and teaching. That's ALL it is.

http://images.smh.com.au/2012/09/15/3637564/art-protest3-620x349.jpg


So I wonder what the many, many Australian Muslims who condemned the actions of the people in the photo were doing?

Also, this whole copy Muhammad thing is pathetic.  Ever read the five pillars of Islam?
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49452
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #873 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:15pm
 
Quote:
There is a "disproportion" of 38 cases out of a total population of nearly 500 thousands. Call it a hunch.


So you used the term "statistically insignificant" while having no clue at all what it actually means?

Quote:
You’re saying a total of 38 defacto marriages


Again Karnal, 38 is not the total.

Quote:
I’m wondering - wondering - if underage marriages turn up in legal underage marriage-with-parental-consent numbers.


So am I - just as they turn up in the census data. I am just wondering why you are seeking more evidence of the same type that you disregard.

Quote:
Your Muselman is just like every other group with or without a fundamental objection to child marriages, and I’ve listeda few.


It is not the absence of a fundamental objection to it. Muhammed did it himself, which is why many Muslims actually support it.

Quote:
This, as you know, is not how the law works. We don’t make convictions based on our perceived lack of a fundamental objection to something. The Grand Mufti expressing his strongest objections ethically, legally, but not religiously, does not prove a case against him.


No, but thanks for confirming my interpretation of his words.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96642
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #874 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:15pm:
Quote:
There is a "disproportion" of 38 cases out of a total population of nearly 500 thousands. Call it a hunch.


So you used the term "statistically insignificant" while having no clue at all what it actually means?

Quote:
You’re saying a total of 38 defacto marriages


Again Karnal, 38 is not the total.

Quote:
I’m wondering - wondering - if underage marriages turn up in legal underage marriage-with-parental-consent numbers.


So am I - just as they turn up in the census data. I am just wondering why you are seeking more evidence of the same type that you disregard..


I’m seeking any evidence at all. So far, you’ve presented none.

If you didn’t already know, underage defacto relationships are completely different to child marriages. There is no commitment in a girlfriend-boyfriend relationship, particularly at 15 - 16.

Marriages between 16 to 18 with parental consent are a totally different category. And again, if there is an explosion of underage marriages in Australia, wouldn’t this be reflected in the category of legal marriages with parental consent?

If the Muselman is selling his daughter overseas for marriage in Australia, wouldn’t this show in the legal (16 - 18) marriage category also?

I’m not asking for an affirmative, I’m merely describing the criteria we’re discussing.

Again, underage marriage is illegal in Australia, so you will find no registered marriages under 16.

You also won’t find any immigrants coming in on the back of an underage bride, as it’s illegal.

You are, as always, placing too much emphasis on the actions of a 1400 year old prophet. People ALWAYS marry for social and economic reasons.

I’ll bet the overseas student in the only case we’ve got married for the visa - an ill-judged move. Her father, on the other hand, had other unknown motives. Financial? Religious? His daughter’s perceived interests?

It would be nice to see you stop flailing against Islam for once, and actually consider motives and interests.

You studied economics, no? Was that at  the prestigious University of Balogney?

That’s the old boy’s alma mater.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sparky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #875 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:59pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:52pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:15pm:
Quote:
There is a "disproportion" of 38 cases out of a total population of nearly 500 thousands. Call it a hunch.


So you used the term "statistically insignificant" while having no clue at all what it actually means?

Quote:
You’re saying a total of 38 defacto marriages


Again Karnal, 38 is not the total.

Quote:
I’m wondering - wondering - if underage marriages turn up in legal underage marriage-with-parental-consent numbers.


So am I - just as they turn up in the census data. I am just wondering why you are seeking more evidence of the same type that you disregard..


I’m seeking any evidence at all. So far, you’ve presented none.

If you didn’t already know, underage defacto relationships are completely different to child marriages. There is no commitment in a girlfriend-boyfriend relationship, particularly at 15 - 16.

Marriages between 16 to 18 with parental consent are a totally different category. And again, if there is an explosion of underage marriages in Australia, wouldn’t this be reflected in the category of legal marriages with parental consent?

If the Muselman is selling his daughter overseas for marriage in Australia, wouldn’t this show in the legal (16 - 18) marriage category also?

I’m not asking for an affirmative, I’m merely describing the criteria we’re discussing.

Again, underage marriage is illegal in Australia, so you will find no registered marriages under 16.

You also won’t find any immigrants coming in on the back of an underage bride, as it’s illegal.

You are, as always, placing too much emphasis on the actions of a 1400 year old prophet. People ALWAYS marry for social and economic reasons.

I’ll bet the overseas student in the only case we’ve got married for the visa - an ill-judged move. Her father, on the other hand, had other unknown motives. Financial? Religious? His daughter’s perceived interests?

It would be nice to see you stop flailing against Islam for once, and actually consider motives and interests.

You studied economics, no? Was that at  the prestigious University of Balogney?

That’s the old boy’s alma mater.
So what's you opinion Karnal? Do you think there may be a problem with underage secret marriages amongst Australia's Islamic community?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49452
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #876 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:05pm
 
Quote:
I’m seeking any evidence at all. So far, you’ve presented none.


That's OK. The Muslims here seem more than happy to present it themselves.

Quote:
If you didn’t already know, underage defacto relationships are completely different to child marriages. There is no commitment in a girlfriend-boyfriend relationship, particularly at 15 - 16.


Actually I am still not sure what the stats actually are, or the extent to which they capture illegal marriages.

Quote:
You are, as always, placing too much emphasis on the actions of a 1400 year old prophet. People ALWAYS marry for social and economic reasons.


That is what I have been saying Karnal. I would add love as a reason, though.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #877 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:13pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:05pm:
That's OK. The Muslims here seem more than happy to present it themselves.


And your evidence to support this is....
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #878 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:25pm
 
Karnal wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:40am:
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:33am:
Stratos wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:23am:
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:19am:
So why the bloody hell are they following Mohammed's example in Australia in every other way?


Care to give a few examples?



What are you? A comedian?

Islam IS about following Mohammed's example and teaching. That's ALL it is.

http://images.smh.com.au/2012/09/15/3637564/art-protest3-620x349.jpg


That’s the spirit, old boy.

Y’s left the thread, so you’re doing the Khristian thing and doing his job for him.

Sorry, FD, it’s not just stale, it’s recycled.. Better pass.



Islam IS about following Mohammed.

Not only that - but NO Musulman will go AGAINST Mohammed's example. The guy could do no wrong, as far as Musulmans are concerned. Finding his conduct objectionable (diddling a 9-12 year old just because she had her first period) is an insult as far as a Musulman is concerned.

You can can tapdance around with the stupidest grin you can muster but this central point, which you are trying desperately to ignore,  IS the central point. Musulman does as Mohammed does.

WHen the Musulman can make his own law - rather than be forced to live as minority under secular  - the Musulman will make sharia law. Under sharia law, bleeding is what matters because that's what mattered to Mohammed. No Musulman will ever condemn that because doing so is insulting to the prophet - and we know what happens to those who dare to insult Mohammed.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #879 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 4:32pm
 
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:25pm:
Not only that - but NO Musulman will go AGAINST Mohammed's example.


This must explain why so many Islamic prophets have been around since Muhammad's death
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96642
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #880 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 4:49pm
 
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:25pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:40am:
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:33am:
Stratos wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:23am:
Soren wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 10:19am:
So why the bloody hell are they following Mohammed's example in Australia in every other way?


Care to give a few examples?



What are you? A comedian?

Islam IS about following Mohammed's example and teaching. That's ALL it is.

http://images.smh.com.au/2012/09/15/3637564/art-protest3-620x349.jpg


That’s the spirit, old boy.

Y’s left the thread, so you’re doing the Khristian thing and doing his job for him.

Sorry, FD, it’s not just stale, it’s recycled.. Better pass.



Islam IS about following Mohammed.

Not only that - but NO Musulman will go AGAINST Mohammed's example. The guy could do no wrong, as far as Musulmans are concerned. Finding his conduct objectionable (diddling a 9-12 year old just because she had her first period) is an insult as far as a Musulman is concerned.

You can can tapdance around with the stupidest grin you can muster but this central point, which you are trying desperately to ignore,  IS the central point. Musulman does as Mohammed does.

WHen the Musulman can make his own law - rather than be forced to live as minority under secular  - the Musulman will make sharia law. Under sharia law, bleeding is what matters because that's what mattered to Mohammed. No Musulman will ever condemn that because doing so is insulting to the prophet - and we know what happens to those who dare to insult Mohammed.



Never ever, eh? NO Muselmen will go AGAINST Mohammed’s example, no?

That means each and every Muselman has eleven to thirteen wives and a littly on the side waiting to be consumated.

Which is most peculiar, old chap, because Sharia law only allows a maximum of four.

Do you want to post the statistics on polygamous marriage in Australia to back up your claim? 

Remember, NO Muselman will go AGAINST Muhammed’s example..

Absolutely, always, never ever.

You will ALWAYS post exactly the same argument no matter what facts are staring you in the face. That’s a University of Balogney education for you, an institution you were most fortunate to attend.

You didn’t see FD there by any chance, did you, old boy?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96642
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #881 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 5:33pm
 
Sparky wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:59pm:
Karnal wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:52pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 2:15pm:
Quote:
There is a "disproportion" of 38 cases out of a total population of nearly 500 thousands. Call it a hunch.


So you used the term "statistically insignificant" while having no clue at all what it actually means?

Quote:
You’re saying a total of 38 defacto marriages


Again Karnal, 38 is not the total.

Quote:
I’m wondering - wondering - if underage marriages turn up in legal underage marriage-with-parental-consent numbers.


So am I - just as they turn up in the census data. I am just wondering why you are seeking more evidence of the same type that you disregard..


I’m seeking any evidence at all. So far, you’ve presented none.

If you didn’t already know, underage defacto relationships are completely different to child marriages. There is no commitment in a girlfriend-boyfriend relationship, particularly at 15 - 16.

Marriages between 16 to 18 with parental consent are a totally different category. And again, if there is an explosion of underage marriages in Australia, wouldn’t this be reflected in the category of legal marriages with parental consent?

If the Muselman is selling his daughter overseas for marriage in Australia, wouldn’t this show in the legal (16 - 18) marriage category also?

I’m not asking for an affirmative, I’m merely describing the criteria we’re discussing.

Again, underage marriage is illegal in Australia, so you will find no registered marriages under 16.

You also won’t find any immigrants coming in on the back of an underage bride, as it’s illegal.

You are, as always, placing too much emphasis on the actions of a 1400 year old prophet. People ALWAYS marry for social and economic reasons.

I’ll bet the overseas student in the only case we’ve got married for the visa - an ill-judged move. Her father, on the other hand, had other unknown motives. Financial? Religious? His daughter’s perceived interests?

It would be nice to see you stop flailing against Islam for once, and actually consider motives and interests.

You studied economics, no? Was that at  the prestigious University of Balogney?

That’s the old boy’s alma mater.
So what's you opinion Karnal? Do you think there may be a problem with underage secret marriages amongst Australia's Islamic community?


You haven’t read many of my posts on this issue, have you, dear?

With absolutely no evidence, no. I don’t. I also don’t envisage a problem anytime soon, given one short reason:

It’s illegal.

Whatever Grand Muftis say or don’t say is ultimately irrelevant. People rarely listen to religious leaders. Muslims are no different. How many protested in Sydney when their religious and community leaders advised them to stay at home? How many turned up in gangs after the Cronulla riots despite community leaders (and their parents) begging them not to take revenge?

From what I can tell, imams do things like preside over weddings, funerals, Eid celebrations and barbecues. They give advice on religious issues and domestic life, but Muslims in Australia live in two worlds, which they weigh up when making decisions.

Imams do sometimes meet in councils, Sharia style, to consider and issue recommendations on divorce and child custody. If Muslims don’t like the "rulings", they take it to the Family Court. When it comes to the crunch, most Muslims, it seems, would rather face secular to Sharia law.

While mechanisms like the above do exist, imams in Australia have as much influence over their flocks as Catholic priests or Anglican ministers. This, at least, is what Muslims have told me. Most Muslims only attend mosques for festivals like Eid - if at all.

Islam is not a hierarchical, military style organization. Devout Muslims believe in applying the principles they learn in practice. Ultimately, it’s their call - not the Mufti’s.

As for following the example of their prophet like robots, it’s not going to happen. Arabs, whether they’re Muslims or Christians, are generally passionate, individualistic people. Iranians - even more so. In my experience, they don’t take too well to following orders.

Churches and mosques perform a community function, not a legal one. Most Arabs, like other Australians, don’t attend church or mosque at all. Iranians in general are far more secular - many got out of Iran for this very reason.

Anyway, I’m not a Muslim. The one Muslim we know says he knows of no Muslim child marriages at all. What say you, G?

Is this correct?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 15th, 2014 at 6:07pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49452
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #882 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 7:20pm
 
Stratos wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:13pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:05pm:
That's OK. The Muslims here seem more than happy to present it themselves.


And your evidence to support this is....


Well for starters there is Gandalf with the opening post. Then there was TC telling everyone that it is OK to have sex with children because science approves of it. Then there are all the previous Muslims we have had here. I think it was a Muslim who presented the census results, thinking it aided their case. Karnal has been helping out too, interrogating people, demanding evidence, telling us what evidence to find, and collecting the examples. I think he even provided some of it himself. All of this to prove that it doesn't happen, a goal they have continually fallen short of, and even undermined with their own efforts. That's why they spent the whole thread demanding everyone else do the proving.

Quote:
Not only that - but NO Musulman will go AGAINST Mohammed's example. The guy could do no wrong, as far as Musulmans are concerned. Finding his conduct objectionable (diddling a 9-12 year old just because she had her first period) is an insult as far as a Musulman is concerned.


There is no actual evidence she reached puberty, except of course that Muhammed was not a pedophile, which we know because she had reached puberty.

Quote:
WHen the Musulman can make his own law - rather than be forced to live as minority under secular  - the Musulman will make sharia law. Under sharia law, bleeding is what matters because that's what mattered to Mohammed.


Muhammed never said a single thing about age of consent.

Quote:
Whatever Grand Muftis say or don’t say is ultimately irrelevant. People rarely listen to religious leaders. Muslims are no different. How many protested in Sydney when their religious and community leaders advised them to stay at home? How many turned up in gangs after the Cronulla riots despite community leaders (and their parents) begging them not to take revenge?


And yet you have been trotting out the Mufti's words as evidence through the whole thread.

Quote:
Islam is not a hierarchical, military style organization.


That's exactly what it is. Muhammed was a military leader. Right up until the Caliphate was dismantled, it was a military empire.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96642
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #883 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:10pm
 
You come across as more of a brainwashed zealot with every post you make, FD. It’s as if you’re suffering from.a degenerative brain aneurism, which distorts thoughts into an ever-dissolving morass.

Evidence is now a bad thing, eh? I guess you’re right. We don’t need evidence here. We need fantasies, nightmares - of the kind only Y and the old boy and increasingly deranged zealots can have. You know, post-apocolyptic dystopias and permanent war. The sort of dreams the Taliban must have.

It’s strange what you’ve become. You’re turning into the very antithesis of what you once learned, believed and held up as guiding principles. We’ve read your 2007 posts.

They made perfect sense to me.

But what interests me is how little you actually know about the phenomenon you’ve made it your life’s work to uncover. How could Islam possibly be a military-style organization? They can’t even get it together in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and Syria. There are so many competing militias, councils, counter-militias and counter-councils, they never get it together. Islam itself is divided into two lineages.

You’re so dogmatically stuck to your position that you’ve forgotten exactly what it is you’re for - or against. You called for a Muslim criticizing child marriage, and you got the Grand Mufti. When the Grand Mufti didn’t use your choice of words, you got Kayser Trad, who used exactly the words you wanted. But that wasn’t good enough either. No evidence?

How dare anyone dare to suggest such a thing? So unfair. No actual child marriages?

Now, come on, that’s going too far.

Your stance is completely unreasonable, FD, and by this I mean against all reason - against the very idea of reason. I love it how I always get the Muselman-lover tag, but do you know?

Your stance is actually more fundamentalist and inflexible than any 8th century Arab text. The Koran, as merciless, bloodthirsty and humourless as it gets, has moments of lucidity.

Your own posts in this thread have been anything but lucid, which I do think is strange - on almost any other topic, you have some interesting insights.

Here, however, you’ve had the full lobotomy. Why? I have no idea. No one’s done it to you.

You seem to have got there all by yourself.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:25pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49452
At my desk.
Re: underage marriage in Sydney
Reply #884 - Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:20pm
 
Quote:
But what interests me is how little you actually know about the phenomenon you’ve made it your life’s work to uncover. How could Islam possibly be a military-style organization? They can’t even get it together in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kashmir and Syria.


Yes they can. Other people stop them. Most of the time it is other Muslims. Sometimes non-Muslims have to get in their way. I said it was a military style organisation. I did not say how effective it is.

Quote:
You’re so dogmatically stuck to your position that you’ve forgotten exactly what it is you’re for - or against. You’ve thrown all critical thought out the window for a fight. You’ve stuck those.in the enemy camp who simply raised your lack of evidence.


My lack of evidence? Why do I have to provide it?

Quote:
You’ve even put Gandalf in there for starting the thread - and then turning round.


I put Gandalf in there because he provided evidence, and I was asked for evidence to back up my claim that Muslims had provided evidence. Are you saying it is a bad thing for me to provide that evidence?

Quote:
Your stance is completely unreasonable, FD


And yet you still don't even know what it is.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 ... 70
Send Topic Print