Australian Politics Forum - The Insiders sack Piers Akerman

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #30 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #31 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the ABC producers, or from the taxpayer?

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #32 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #33 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #34 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:09am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

The money to Peckerman was authorised and credited into his bank account by the ABC company.
Dumbass Grin

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #35 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:12am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:09am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

The to Peckerman was authorised and credited into his bank account by the ABC company.
Dumbass Grin

And from where did that money originally come? Was it from the taxpayers, or was it not? It's a very straightforward question.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #36 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:17am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:12am:

And from where did that money originally come? Was it from the taxpayers, or was it not? It's a very straightforward question.

That does not give any right to any tax payer to determine the hiring and firing of personnel at the ABC.

Otherwise someone give me the direct line to Gina, I want to complain about her hiring practices. Given more tax payer money goes to mining than the ABC, I think as a tax payer I have a say in how she runs her business. Dumbass Grin

If you believe this fantastic sacking of a moron somehow breaches the abc charter then run along and make the complaint. But I promise you that in this case everyone, absolutely EVERYONE, will laugh at you uncontrollably. They'll share in the joy we receive in this forum each and every day.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96640

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #37 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:18am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

Matty, it's us. We're the taxpayers. We pay the wages. We're the employers.

I trust we've put the matter to rest.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #38 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:20am

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:18am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

Matty, it's us. We're the taxpayers. We pay the wages. We're the employers.

I trust we've put the matter to rest.

Karnal, you can be Managing Director

Matty can be Finance Director.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96640

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #39 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:25am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:20am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:18am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:07am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:06am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:59am:

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:09am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:05am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:45pm:

If you spend half of your time bad mouthing the employer what do you expect.

He isn't employed by the ABC, he is employed by News Ltd. Beyond that, it would be interesting for you to consider the GM of ABC's position under Abbott as PM (effectively his boss)...

Insiders is a News Ltd program ?

Who payed him when he was on the Insiders - the taxpayer, or the producers of the show?

The ABC.

Der. Not that difficult to understand. For people with brains.

From where did the money come? From the aBC producers, or from the taxpayer?

You clearly don't understand. Sad. Sad

PS: Producers aren't the ones who give money to tv stations. Dumbass.

Just answer the question.

Matty, it's us. We're the taxpayers. We pay the wages. We're the employers.

I trust we've put the matter to rest.

Karnal, you can be Managing Director

Matty can be Finance Director.

Thanks, Alevine. I'd like to put Longy in as executive producer.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #40 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:26am Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:25am: Thanks, Alevine. I'd like to put Longy in as executive producer. What a great choice! And can we hire Misty to clean the studios?
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96640

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #41 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:44am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:26am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:25am:

Thanks, Alevine. I'd like to put Longy in as executive producer.

What a great choice!

And can we hire Misty to clean the studios?

I can see no reason why not - good choice. Can Matty double as specialist?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #42 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:48am

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:26am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:25am:

Thanks, Alevine. I'd like to put Longy in as executive producer.

What a great choice!

And can we hire Misty to clean the studios?

I can see no reason why not - good choice. Can Matty double as specialist?

I feel Matty should be the head anchor, as well as take over hosting both Qanda and Insiders. Also, Matty should be in charge of MediaWatch.

In fact, let Matty be the new face of the ABC? And cods as the weather girl.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

bogarde73 Gold Member Offline Anti-Global & Contra Mundum Posts: 18443 Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #43 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:49am David Stratton tweeted: The ABC is reporting the navy tortured Schapelle Corby. Very funny
Back to top	Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism. IP Logged

St George of the Garden

Gold Member

Offline

http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #44 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 9:55am

matty wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 8:06am:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 9:34pm:

matty wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 9:22pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 9:17pm:

It is good the fat blowhard is gone and it seems he brought it on himself.

He is no journo, just a commentator, like Andrew Dolt, peddling nonsense like his made–up “Heiner Affair.”

Just when you think that the left can't stoop any lower, they go and do it. They want to cover up union corruption, and now you want to cover up child abuse.

Heiner wasn’t looking into child abuse.

Yes it was.

Matty, you need to stop drinking the coolaid. Heiner was employed to investigate staff–management realtionships at the Oxley Youth Centre. That is all.

When the chief archivist destroyed his report she stated there was “nothing of a sexual nature in it.”

The aboriginal girl who was raped has asked the fat slob to stop mentioning the events.

Stop drinking the red koolaid. Akerman has lied about the “Heiner Affair” ever since. Neither Lib nor Labor want to do anything about an imaginary event.

You won’t believe me, which is a pity: pursuing a cheap lie like Akerman’s “Heiner Affair” is pursuing a will o’ the whisp, will lead you astray, waste your time and eventually when you realise there is nothing to it you will feel used. Try being just a bit sceptical about what you are told.

Back to top

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!

Friends of the National Broadband Network

IP Logged