Australian Politics Forum - The Insiders sack Piers Akerman

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 96659

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #75 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139651 Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #76 - Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:49pm matty wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 8:34pm: The Insiders program has thrown Piers Akerman off the show ... Have they? Splendid news! Good to see that the ABC are implementing quality control.
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35217
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #77 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Kat

Gold Member

Offline

Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #78 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:18am

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

Because the alternative, to put it mildly, SUCKS HARD!

As some are slowly waking up and seeing.

Back to top

IP Logged

John S Gold Member Offline Fascist Party = Liberal Party Posts: 3691 Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #79 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:19am matty, you are going on that you don't like the taxpayers are paying for the ABC because in your book the ABC is biased. Well I don't like Abbott as Prime Minister so why are we paying him then. Abbott is not my prime minister he is not governing for the whole of Australia like he said he would.
Back to top	'The worst Labor Government is always better then the best Liberal government for Australians workers' IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #80 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:50am

Holden, Toyota, Qantas and numerous other companies have shed jobs since the Abbott government came to office. Cost cutting is going on everywhere as Australia closes for business. And someone is sooking because a particular right-wing commentator is not immune to this cost cutting?

Reap what you sow, rightards. Reap what you sow.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35217
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #81 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:59am

Bam wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:50am:

Holden, Toyota, Qantas and numerous other companies have shed jobs since the Abbott government came to office. Cost cutting is going on everywhere as Australia closes for business. And someone is sooking because a particular right-wing commentator is not immune to this cost cutting?

Reap what you sow, rightards. Reap what you sow.

Again, the paradox. The fortunes of the right are enhanced by the ABC sacking the pompous twat. And the fortunes of the left are destroyed by the ABC attacking the navy and supporting country shoppers.

reap what you sew leftards, reap what you sew.
Come out to suburbia with the gazillion swinging voters and see if they like the ABC attacking the navy. Cheesy

.

Akerman , glad he's gone. Should boost the conservative vote by having pure condescending luvvies on the ABC Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 96659

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #82 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 8:41am

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

So true, dear. Alan is the voice of the people, and the leftards can go suck Mr Abbott’s slug.

Your posts are starting to rival Cods, Aquascoot.

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #83 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 8:47am matty wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 9:22pm: Just when you think that the left can't stoop any lower, they go and do it. They want to cover up union corruption, and now you want to cover up child abuse. The left want to cover up child abuse? I thought that was the Catholic church.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35217
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #84 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:00am

Karnal wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 8:41am:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

So true, dear. Alan is the voice of the people, and the leftards can go suck Mr Abbott’s slug.

Your posts are starting to rival Cods, Aquascoot.

now luvvie, yours are rivalling spots Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #85 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:02am

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

What a simple answer to your rant: Commentators from the right love to over-hype, scream, and spread fear. People react to this much better than they do to rational reporting, or commentating, with facts.

Plus, as much as we hate fast food, we love fast food. As much as we hate big business and banks, we love money. But when it comes to those subjects that you seem to hate...you know...the ENVIRONMENT. Well, let's face it: The majority of Australians don't see whales or the barrier reef. And the majority of Australians are not in the bush. And majority of Australians couldn't care less about how energy is generated. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't protect those things or come up with cleaner ways to generate energy. It's not a popularity race to gain the dumb vote. It's national interest. And sometimes, in fact I'd argue in MAJORITY OF CASES, the national interest results in negative support from the electorate at first. So, a good leader doesn't listen to the idiot who rants after having 10 beers at the local pub. Nor should they listen to the self absorbed who only care about how much something will cost them. Instead, a good leader listens to experts, and considers all available information. And based on this, they make a determination that they believe to be in the best interest of the country.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:15am by sir prince duke alevine »

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #86 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:08am

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:59am:

Bam wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:50am:

Holden, Toyota, Qantas and numerous other companies have shed jobs since the Abbott government came to office. Cost cutting is going on everywhere as Australia closes for business. And someone is sooking because a particular right-wing commentator is not immune to this cost cutting?

Reap what you sow, rightards. Reap what you sow.

Again, the paradox. The fortunes of the right are enhanced by the ABC sacking the pompous twat. And the fortunes of the left are destroyed by the ABC attacking the navy and supporting country shoppers.

reap what you sew leftards, reap what you sew.
Come out to suburbia with the gazillion swinging voters and see if they like the ABC attacking the navy. Cheesy

.

Akerman , glad he's gone. Should boost the conservative vote by having pure condescending luvvies on the ABC Wink

ABC attacked the navy?

See, now you're being stupid. Please stop right there.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

St George of the Garden Gold Member Offline http://tinyurl.com/n 3o8m2x Posts: 9809 Gender:	Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias. Reply #87 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:10am Insiders is usually full or rightwing dolts like Nicky Savva anyway. The absence of Piers will make insiders slightly better tho still a complete wast of time.
Back to top	I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso! IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 96659

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #88 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:16am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:02am:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

What a simple answer to your rant: Commentators from the right love to over-hype, scream, and spread fear. People react to this much better than they do to rational reporting, or commentating, with facts.

Plus, as much as we hate fast food, we love fast food. As much as we hate big business and banks, we love money. But when it comes to those subjects that you seem to hate...you know...the ENVIRONMENT. Well, let's face it: The majority of Australians don't see whales or the barrier reef. And the majority of Australians are not in the bush. And majority of Australians couldn't care less about how energy is generated. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't protect those things or come up with cleaner ways to generate energy. It's not a popularity race to gain the dumb vote. It's national interest. And sometimes, in fact I'd argue in MAJORITY OF CASES, the national interest results in negative support from the electorate at first. So, a good leader doesn't listen to the idiot who rants after having 10 beers at the local pub. Nor should they listen to the self absorbed who only care about how much something will cost them. Instead, a good leader listens to experts, and considers all available information. And based on this, they make a determination that they believe to be in the best interest of the country.

That's a bit unfair, Alevine. Alan sells lots of advertising - he's clearly the best man here.

Alan or the CSIRO? The CSIRO or Alan?

Sorry, leftards, Alan wins every time.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: The Insiders sack Piers Akerman - more ABC bias.
Reply #89 - Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:19am

Karnal wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:16am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 9:02am:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 7:08am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 4:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 3:24pm:

i think the majority do share my view.
alan earns a lot more than david marr.

Good point, Aquascoot. If we can only get David Marr to stop bashing the banks, start spruiking Qantas, and do a few 30 second spots for the marvellous Lavenders, we'll finally have equality.

The success of alan (financially and with ratings) and the failure of the lefties (financially and with ratings) speaks volumes.
by ratings , one could substitute public support.

Now why is that. Why are the rightard commentators able to sell stuff that people disapprove of (banks, fast food, big business)
whilst leftard commentators and activists cant sell stuff we should love (the environment, the barrier reef, whales, clean energy).

you have to say that these F^^KING DUMB LEFTARD MEDIA CLOWNS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS GROUPS
(people like david marr, sarah hansen young, eva cox, tim flannery, the panel of Q and A, Get Up. Occupy wall street, The socialist alliance ) have HIJACKED the prime real estate and completely butchered it. They have botched the sale of these ideas beyond belief.
Every time these whiney sooks and fools open their mouths they set back their cause another country mile.

You really got to hand it to the leftard journalists. They are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo out of touch.
Letting people like murdoch and jones whip their asses over and over . They are the best friends the right have, thanks to their incredible arrogance and condescending attitude to the man in the street. I like a lot of their causes but why would you throw your hat in with a bunch of amateur losers like them
Wink

What a simple answer to your rant: Commentators from the right love to over-hype, scream, and spread fear. People react to this much better than they do to rational reporting, or commentating, with facts.

Plus, as much as we hate fast food, we love fast food. As much as we hate big business and banks, we love money. But when it comes to those subjects that you seem to hate...you know...the ENVIRONMENT. Well, let's face it: The majority of Australians don't see whales or the barrier reef. And the majority of Australians are not in the bush. And majority of Australians couldn't care less about how energy is generated. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't protect those things or come up with cleaner ways to generate energy. It's not a popularity race to gain the dumb vote. It's national interest. And sometimes, in fact I'd argue in MAJORITY OF CASES, the national interest results in negative support from the electorate at first. So, a good leader doesn't listen to the idiot who rants after having 10 beers at the local pub. Nor should they listen to the self absorbed who only care about how much something will cost them. Instead, a good leader listens to experts, and considers all available information. And based on this, they make a determination that they believe to be in the best interest of the country.

That's a bit unfair, Alevine. Alan sells lots of advertising - he's clearly the best man here.

Alan or the CSIRO? The CSIRO or Alan?

Sorry, leftards, Alan wins every time.

With Alan around, I don't even know why we have the CSIRO! What a waste of money. Another lefty thing imposed on us!

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged