Swagman wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 10:13pm:
Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:51pm:
Swagman wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:39pm:
So if a bunch of Sumatran tigers were prowling the playground in your local town eating the occasional person you'd be outraged if they were culled?
Your analogy is flawed. Whose home is it?
For a more accurate analogy: Humans sometimes venture into crocodile-filled rivers. Occasionally someone is taken. Do we then start an indiscriminate culling of as many crocodiles as we can find? No, we do not.
Govt's don't allow man eating Crocodiles in suburban areas any more than they should ignore man eating sharks at suburban beaches.
Rubbish argument. We don't build our homes in the water.
Quote:Wild dogs are culled, feral pigs and horses are culled. Where there is a danger to the public from a wild animal they are culled.
Again, rubbish. These animals are not protected species. Great white sharks are.
Quote:Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
Sharks are apex predators. They kill that they may eat. Would you have all the sharks eating tofu?
Sharks can kill and eat as much as they want as long as it's not near suburban beaches.
That is a matter of opinion. Why not use shark nets or other barriers to keep them away?
Quote:Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
Only if those killers are human. Mercy - or the lack of it - is purely a human trait. Animals do not have such concepts as mercy.
Oh garbage. Dangerous animals are culled all the time.
And what animals are these, exactly?
Quote:Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
Then the public should keep clear of the sharks. The ocean is THEIR home, not ours.
You should apply that logic to the illegal boats
Non sequitur.
Quote:Bam wrote on Feb 13
th, 2014 at 9:46pm:
You're very much in the minority on this
So what? Challenging the collective is a good thing. We maybe ruled by a tyranny of the mob and gagged by political correctness but a little bit of individual opinion still survives.
So you would go around killing protected species just because you're too cheap to build exclusion barriers?